1 / 12

The future of the evolution of legality, History of Eugenics, years of sterilization in the 1900's, Disability computer

<br>tThe future of societal integrations, the evolution of legality, the faults of leaders, mention of medical and sociological advancement, and abortion due to medical disability. <br>

Download Presentation

The future of the evolution of legality, History of Eugenics, years of sterilization in the 1900's, Disability computer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jacob R. Stotler March 21, 2018 The future of societal integrations, the evolution of legality, the faults of leaders, mention of medical and sociological advancement, and social movements of the disabled people in modern society. A synergized conclusion of momentum. A REALIZATION IN PERSPECTIVE A REALIZATION IN PERSPECTIVE Historically, disabled people (in America an estimated 43,000,000 Americans) have faced numerous, or almost common distresses throughout the years of colonization (Americans with disabilities Act of 1990, 1). The inclusive statement of the actual distress involved could be said to be innumerable and devastating. The explored measures of social inconveniences affecting the disabled, range from apathetic authoritarian leadership, of governing hierarchies, deleterious and obstructive opinions and recommendations from germane doctors and medical providers, to the commencement of laws especially targeting disabled citizens. The intercommunion of disabled people has evolved with, and alongside the outlooks of societal politics. The defining terms of this paper are written to express hopeful aspects of these issues under the scrutiny and scope of the evolution of Law / technology. While in reality, objective applications of society have been growing onwards, more towards the accommodation of disabled people, including such areas as the medical field, medical sciences and technologies.

  2. Regarding the history of the social world of the disabled, the future has options, even including the most morbid histories of relational obscenities. The incorporation of evolving knowledge, technology, conceptualization and diversification, worldwide, provides a more faultless infrastructure to best accommodate all societies. Especially so, on the subjects of disability and the rights of disabled people. While society integrates more propitious medical practices, breakthrough areas of treatment, and the most accommodating architecture thus far in history. With time comes technology, with thought comes action, and heroically: “with great power comes great responsibility” (Lee, 11). SOCIAL REARING, PSUEDO SOCIAL REARING, PSUEDO- -SCIENCE & SCIENCE & MACROSOCIOLOGY OF THE DISABLED MACROSOCIOLOGY OF THE DISABLED. . A participating psychiatrist and medical doctor that during the years of 1850-1909 attempted to convince the legitimate societies that criminals had ever identical traits, regarding numerous characteristics. One of the books written by Cesare Lombroso, punctuated remarks and claims that most criminals shared ever extant physical features and looks. The writings and the drawings inclusive of this claim sharpened the idea that some mentally disabled people “monguls” as he called them, were nearly inseparable to association with crime and criminality (Lombroso, 39-96). While Lombroso continued to scrutinize people of different races, sizes and extremities as being insignia of crime and criminology, the art and words portrayed in his book disfavorably exploited people with down syndrome, physical and intellectual disabilities, and otherwise, to a new stigma. Lombroso claimed that these kinds of people were natural born criminals. Criminals were said to be seen as to be “retarded”/ “homo deliquens” (instead of

  3. Homo Sapiens) had written Cesare Lombroso (as a historic discovery in criminology). (Lombroso, 39-96) While there were many other well known people to discriminate against people with disabilities some of these include: doctors that recklessly prescribed “institutionalization” for any disabled people, Dr. Samuel Cartwright that claimed medically, that Afro Americans were becoming disabled, or ill with a “pseudo science” based diagnosis, that register now under discrimination, bias archetypical accusations, and complete “professional” racism. Dr. Cartwright authored ill accusations attempting to use his doctoral status as a means to coerce belief in his theories (and race). (Baynton, 4) (Brown, 1). While other lesser known people too, have been identified as to have “targeted” people with disabilities with the crime and iniquitousness of rape and sexual violation. The fact is; not only are people the statues of the powers that be, but ideas are influential over the systems in which they govern, no matter the stator of the persons that speak them. What seem to be even small ideas, have the potential to influence a majority of the social structure established, directly or indirectly, when communicating about such precarious issues as the fate and administration of the disabled. THROUGH THE 19th th CENTURY ERAS AMERICAN LAW AMERICAN LAW: : OPPOSITIONAL TO DEFENSE OPPOSITIONAL TO DEFENSE THROUGH THE 19 CENTURY ERAS Regardless of pseudo-science attacks, and near horrendous recommendations from doctors (treatments verging malpractice) in the earlier 1900’sto the 1970’s, doctors and numerous other respected professionals warded people with disabilities into isolated

  4. confinement / institutions with minimal educational programming (Brown, 1). Yet Laws too, were being made. The first involuntary sterilization law was set into place in Indiana, USA in 1907 that legalized the complete involuntary sterilization of “confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles, and rapists” (Indiana Eugenics, 1) During these periods idiots and imbeciles were known as a units of retardation / people with disabilities, “imbeciles more competent than idiots” (Gold, 1). Indiana involuntary sterilized ~2,300 people during the eras of 1907-1974, by the time the law was eradicated (Indiana Eugenics, 1). Laws were being elaborated even to the extent of the enforcement and integration of “ugly laws”, in the US during the late 1800’s to the 1970’s. “Ugly laws” targeted people to prevent society from being forced to cope, with simply seeing people that could be construed as “disgusting, unsightly and deformed” (Schweick, 1). While laws conterminous with Eugenics were made and nearly reflected genocide, sterilization, deportation and elimination of certain kinds of people. The new eras, the new leaders, and the new foundations of society bring advancing technologies roaring to assist the clarity of rights and prospected quality of life for disabled people. In converse to the Eugenics movement are overtures of the future and laws, such as “The appropriation act of 2015” of Virginia state that was revised in 2015. This law was signed by the Governor McAuliffe of Virginia; it states generally: “language of compensation for sterilization victims or authorized representatives”, regarding the Eugenics movements of Virginia State, USA in the 1900’s (Virginia State, 1).

  5. During the eras leaving the 1800’s, American laws became more and more inclusive to sustain, to diversify, to accommodate and to stabilize a more robust infrastructure for the lives of the disabled, to live as equal as possible, including other intercommunions of society / minority groups. In the past 50 years there have been numerous acts of American lawmakers and American politics to protect the rights, and vitality of people affected by disabilities in numerous forms. Those laws are relevant to the governing definitions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, and The Fair housing act of 1991 among other subsections of accountable American laws. (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 1). These laws protect not only the rights of disabled people to find higher tier jobs, but also include legal conservation: from discrimination, and lack of access to housing units and substructures. Furthermore, attacks on disabled people, can be taken or reported as hate crimes; there is and indubitable inlay of protection written within American history now (U.S. CODE, 1). The recent past in the author- man-ship in American law, the law has been formulated of nearly inherent promises that the disabled people will more so, be protected in the future by law, rather than targeted by Social buttresses and systemizations to accomplish functions of Eugenics. SPROUTS OF LIGHT: SPROUTS OF LIGHT: QUALITY OF LIFE OF DISABLED PEOPLE QUALITY OF LIFE OF DISABLED PEOPLE A disability is defined in terms as a restrictive medical disorder that delineates an individual a “physical, mental, cognitive, or developmental condition that impairs or limits ability / a medical disorder” (Merriam-Webster, 1).

  6. The years of modern age technology have proclaimed within many different areas in society, in election for better quality lives for all, including the disabled. While nearly all states in the U.S. have adopted a relationship with Internationally recognized disability departments, and/or state funded pro-disability entities such as the International Disability Rights team, a federal organization in support of disabled people. The FBI is also a supportive covenant, in regards to newly pronounced obligatory investigations of hate crimes against people with disabilities (Department of State, 1) (FBI, 2018). The medical field offers options for predetermination and identification of such disabilities as down syndrome from the first trimester of modern day American pregnancy. While it is said that 90% of women who are divulged to the fact that they may be carrying a baby with down syndrome abort the pregnancy (Berger, 38). While when a child is born with a disability there are many more opportunities now for a healthier and more fine tuned integration into society, compared to that of the mechanisms of the past. Even in Wyoming, a state population of ~586,000, there are over 5 million results from major search engines, searching for a group home for the disabled in Wyoming (U.S. Census Bureau, 1) The disabled are now capable of applying and receiving social security (financial) benefits (Social Security Administration, 1). With the many other tributaries of protection and support, the disabled also have gained many other supports such as pro-disability departments of the interior. Many states exclusively fund at least one department for the disabled and protection of the disabled. This all not to mention that Universities now offer the same kind of support in a more microsocial dynamic for disability assistance interior of Universities and colleges. Lastly, it is

  7. noteworthy to distinguish that disability studies, and classes devoted to the generations of people affected by disabilities are in session. There seems to be no covetous corner of society regarding the rights of the disabled approaching the years of the 2020’s. While schools formerly known for their magisterial law schools and medical classes now offer enhancements in intelligence within disability studies, and disability specialties, disability rights and the histories of disability studies. CONCENTRATE CONCENTRATED TECHNOLOGY: THE ABLITIES D TECHNOLOGY: THE ABLITIES In closing, the ability for disabled people along with other intercommunions of American people, and otherwise, to overlook some of the harsh degradations or insults of the political past regarding their natural endowments, are strengths of these people. The idea or baseline that will vie the leading times of the future from disabled people’s perspective, is that of technology. Technology has done some of the hardest work for society regarding disability. While technology is inclusive of the medical field, the political movements of American Society, and the society of locale communities, technology ranges, and more precisely accommodates for future breakthrough, in nearly every aspect of life in modern day. Technology such as identifying down syndrome early, and the “basic” functions of search engines, and other means of early identification, prevention and identification of sustenance, disability enhanced computer Apps will all be vital tracks to follow by scrutiny into the future. Where battles have taken place for the disabled people to be blessed with some of the societal attributes that they are now, technology has taken noticeable leaps (all over the world). The truth and future of the lives of the disabled will depend on and be enhanced by the work

  8. and findings of science, law, medicine and technology regarding quality of life of the disabled, and quality of life of the able bodied, or able-minded. The conclusions of momentum in modern society remain to convey: people are historically progressing towards “freeing” disabled people of their long history of strife and erraticism within society. Intercommunions and newly originating minority groups, more than ever, are being cajoled to live “as equal as possible”, in a society that has fed on archetypal fashions, trends, and teachings for ages before this.

  9. Works Cited “Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.”Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 2009. Baynton, Douglas C. “Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History,” The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis, 4th ed., Taylor & Francis, 2013, pp. 17- 33. Berger, Ronald J. Introducing Disability Studies. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2013. Brown, D. The horrifying truth uncovered: Willowbrook State School. Page 1. Retrieved February 18, 2018 from http://www.rootedinrights.org/the-horrifying-truth-uncovered-willowbrook- state-school/ . U.S. Census Bureau. Wyoming. Wyoming Census. (2018). Accessed February 19, 2018 from http://census.gov . Department of State. International Disability Rights. (2018). Pg.1. Online access. Retrieved February 19, 2018 from https://www.state.gov/j/drl/sadr/ . FBI. Hate Crimes. (2018). Online. Retrieved February 19, 2018 from https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/hate-crimes . Merriam-Webster. Disability. (2018). Online. Accessed February 18, 2018 from http://m-w.com . Gold, Cambell. Morons, imbeciles, and idiots. (2011). CMG archives. Retrieved February 18, 2018 from http://www.campbellmgold.com/archive_esoteric/morons_imbeciles_idiots.pdf .

  10. Lee, Stan. Amazing Fantasy #15, August 1962. Page 11, Accessed February 18, 2018. Lombroso, Cesare. “Criminal man: Edition 1-5.” In Criminal man. 1876. (2006a). Edited and translated by Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter, 39–96. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. Accessed February 18, 2018. Lombroso, Cesare. “Criminal man: Edition 2.” In Criminal man, 1878. (2006b). Edited and translated by Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter, 97–160. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. Accessed February 18, 2018. Lombroso, Cesare. “Criminal man: Edition 3.” In Criminal man, 1884. (2006c). Edited and translated by Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter, 161–226. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. Accessed February 18, 2018. Lombroso, Cesare. “Criminal man: Edition 4.” InCriminal man, 1889. (2006d). Edited and translated by Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter, 227–298. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. Accessed February 18, 2018. Lombroso, Cesare.. “Criminal man: Edition 5.” In Criminal man, 1896-1897. (2006e). Edited and translated by Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter, 299–356. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. Accessed February 18, 2018. Schweik, S. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. (2009). New York and London: NYU Press. Social Security Administration. Supplemental security Income Home Page – 2017 Edition. (2017). Retrieved February 19, 2018 from http://www.ssa.gov/ssi/ .

  11. U.S. Code. Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Statute 249. Hate Crime Acts. Accessed February 19, 2018 from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/249 . Virginia State. Victims of Eugenics Sterilization Compensation Program. (2018). Accessed February 18, 2018 from http://dbhds.virginia.gov/developmental- services/victimsofeugenics .

  12. Finally, the revisions made were such that the title changed. The title was lengthened to accommodate for the revisions made, and also to clearly define where the paper brought argument and refulgence. The title now includes the idea that the paper contains momentum in argument, but only because of other works and references referenced in the article. Also, the paper went through countless drafting revisions such as changing out words and accommodating readers to target the reader in an intelligible sense rather than a creative overtone. There were numerous sentences that are re-worded strictly to maintain clear suggestibility and sculpt the paper to be read in a claritive sense rather than a figurative sense Paragraphs were also reformed. This was intended to structure the ideas in the paper as more organized and sundry, and to better accent and accommodate each other. The paper involves a lot of ideas and proactive ones at all. One of the other major revisions that took place (along with grammatical restructuring and more organized and fine tuned word placement, was that of the rewording or renaming the subheadings. The subheadings now read of historic markers, highlights to societal aspects of disabilities, and movements, but also explain that breakthroughs came as small lights of attention to these issues, rather than the previously written idea, that movements were already happening. Essentially the entire paper was revised word by word, and organizational framework to sub organizational structures.

More Related