190 likes | 311 Views
This article delves into Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs), an innovative technology that connects vehicles to enhance communication and safety. Exploring the fundamentals of VANETs, it covers key aspects like Medium Access Control (MAC), Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC), and applications such as traffic control, automatic speed limit enforcement, and accident notifications. Additionally, it examines various mobility models, including random waypoint and obstacle-based models, that simulate vehicular movement dynamics. The paper underscores the importance of VANETs in modern transportation infrastructure.
E N D
Amit SahaApril 13th, 2005 VANET: VEHICULAR AD HOC NETWORKS
What is a VANET ? • Ad hoc network composed of vehicles • Individual nodes different from traditional wireless nodes • No power constraint • Nodes mostly mobile • Complements existing infrastructure • Extends existing infrastructure
Medium Access Control • Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) • FCC regulated 5.9 GHz • 10 MHz channels • 1 control, 6 service • MAC similar to 802.11, i.e., CSMA/CA • OFDM used in PHY • Speeds up to 120 mph • Up to 1000 m transmission range
VANET 2004 • First conference of its kind • 9 papers, 7 posters • Safety applications (3) • Security (2) • Data dissemination (4)
Sensors in VANET Nodes • Size and power no longer issues
Applications • Traffic control • Automatic speed limit enforcement • Rerouting in traffic congestion • Safety • Notification of accident up ahead • Decentralized 911 service • Prioritized over non-safety applications • Extended communication • Infotainment
Snowplowing Project • Project by Berkeley PATH • Snowplowing in total whiteout • Vehicle equipped with sensors for • Measuring steering angle and vehicle motion • Field of magnetic markers on roadway • Obstacle detection (radar sensors)
Security Aspects • Somewhat similar to sensor networks • Sensors might report “incorrect” data • Undetected error • Detected error • Corrected error
Data Collection • No aggregation • No hierarchy • Simple model for data collection
Data Delivery • Opportunistic forwarding • Disconnection possible • Geographic forwarding • Trajectory based forwarding • A coordinate system is assumed • Nodes know position in this coordinate system • Route is a trajectory in this coordinate system
Conclusion • Similar to mobile ad hoc networks • Has sensors but usage is mostly different • Accident notification similar to ‘fire !!!’ in sensor networks • Not power or size constrained
Amit SahaApril 13th, 2005 MOBILITY MODELS
Different Mobility Models • Random waypoint model • City section model • Obstacle-based model
Random Waypoint Model • Convergence issues • Nodes tend to converge to center • Wrap around • Reflection • Average speed • Minimum speed has to be greater than zero • Many variations exist
City Section Model • Simulates movement of vehicles on streets • Gets very complicated to make realistic • Lane change • Traffic light modeling • Widely used versions are simplistic • Grid structure
Obstacle-based Model • Models obstacles • Restricts movement • Nodes do not reflect off surfaces • Restricts wireless propagation • Doors used to cross buildings • Movement on Voronoi Graph
Problems • Steady state unknown • Existence is not known as well • When is steady state reached in simulation • Infocom 2005 best paper, EPFL, Lausanne • Conditions required for steady state behavior • Several mobility models • Steady state initialization