200 likes | 209 Views
KKC’s Assessment Academy Project Update. August 2012. Writing Across the Curriculum:. What we’ve done…. What we’ve learned…. Where we’re heading…. What we need…. Who we are…. Sangita Deb – Physical Science Eleanor Harrison – Writing Center Tasha Jarrett – Institutional Research
E N D
KKC’s Assessment Academy Project Update August 2012
Writing Across the Curriculum: What we’ve done… What we’ve learned… Where we’re heading… What we need…
Who we are… • Sangita Deb – Physical Science • Eleanor Harrison – Writing Center • Tasha Jarrett – Institutional Research • Khalid Uddin – Biology • Martha Vertreace-Doody – Communications • Giano Cromley – Communications
Last year, this project proposed to re-tool the existing WAC program by: • Improving the Sample Submissions Process • Improving the Scoring Process • Improving the Feedback Loop
What we’ve done… • Met as a committee to determine paper collection strategies • Held a workshop to train committee members on paper scoring • Collected 230 writing samples from 10 departments (preliminary numbers) • Scored writing samples using WAC rubric • Compiled data for distribution to faculty
What we’ve learned… Composition Scores: Style Scores: Sentence Structure Scores:
What we’ve learned… Usage Scores: Mechanics Scores:
What we’ve learned… the numbers • Composition is the strongest aspect of our students’ writing with 81% scoring a 4 or 3. • Usage is the weakest aspect of our students’ writing with 35% achieving only a 1 or 2. • Style is another aspect of writing which is difficult for our students with only 68% achieving a 4 or 3.
What we’ve learned… surprises • Sentence Structure was strong, with only 27% not achieving mastery. • Mechanics was also strong, with only 28% not demonstrating mastery. (More on this later.) • Everything else largely confirmed what most English professors probably could have told you.
Where we’re heading… • WAC Committee will meet this fall to discuss these results and formulate preliminary recommendations • These recommendations will be shared and refined with the English Department • Final recommendations will be distributed to entire KKC faculty through Department Chairs
Where we’re heading… • WAC Committee will discuss ways scoring rubric can be improved. For example: Is Mechanics relevant to our understanding of student writing? • WAC Committee will discuss ways to expand awareness of the project and to increase submissions. • Keep on keeping on…
What we need… • Continue to incorporate writing into your classroom • Make sure you submit papers if you are asked by the WAC committee or your department chair • Volunteer to serve on the WAC Committee
Prompt 1: A Lecture Summary • After you have finished a day’s lecture, ask the students to write a two-paragraph summary of what you just taught them. (You might be very surprised by what you find out while reading these.)
Prompt 2: A Learner’s Progress Report • At particular points in the semester, ask the students to write a brief report on how they think they’re doing in your class. Ask them to include any concepts they think are difficult and which concepts they think they have mastered.
Prompt 3: A Journal • Have your students keep a reflection journal during the semester.
Submission Requirements: • Samples should be at least 250 words long • Helps to have a packet of at least 12 papers • Writing should be related to the course material in some way • Ungraded and unmarked • Not plagiarized
What we need… • YOU! • Please consider joining the WAC Committee • Benefits include: • Glory • Fame • Riches
Contact Information: • Giano Cromley in Room Y-177 • gcromley@ccc.edu • 602-5180