1 / 60

Dynamical Mean Field Theory DMFT and electronic structure calculations

Dynamical Mean Field Theory DMFT and electronic structure calculations. Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University. ICTP Trieste August 2003. Outline.

ivy
Download Presentation

Dynamical Mean Field Theory DMFT and electronic structure calculations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dynamical Mean Field Theory DMFT and electronic structure calculations Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University ICTP Trieste August 2003

  2. Outline • Pedagogical Introduction to DMFT for correlated electron systems, parallel with DFT GW .[R. Chitra , P Sun, S. Savrasov and GK] • How good is the local approximation ? a) a brief look at some recent experiments. b) compare with exact results in one dimension. c) look at corrections. What new effects do cluster corrections bring on top of single site DMFT ? Some answers on a model of kappa organics (O. Parcollet G. Biroli and GK) • Some system specific calculations for materials near the Mott transition: La1-x Srx TiO3 , , Pu……… THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  3. Weakly correlated electrons:band theory. • Simple conceptual picture of the ground state, excitation spectra, transport properties of many systems (simple metals, semiconductors,….). • A methods for performing quantitative calculations. (Density functional theory, in various approximations and GW). THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  4. Start with TOE THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  5. DFT: effective action construction THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  6. DFT: Kohn Sham formulation = THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  7. Exchange and correlation energy • Exact formal expressions can be given in terms of a coupling constant integration.[Harris-Jones, adiabatic connection] • DFT is useful because practical accurate expressions for Exc, exist. • LDA, GGA, hybrids, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  8. Kohn Sham reference system THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  9. Kohn Sham Greens function is an good point to compute spectra in perturbation theory in screenedCoulomb interaction GW,G0W0 Practical implementations, introduce a finite basis set. Division into valence (active ) degrees of freedom and core. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  10. DFT+GW program has been less succesful in correlated situations. • Strong interactions localize the particles. Atoms with open shells are not easily connected to band theory. • The spectrum in this case, contain Hubbard bands which are NOT simply perturbatively connected to the Kohn Sham orbitals. • Need an alternative reference point for doing perturbation theory! • Need to treat bands and atomic excitations on the same footing. • DMFT! THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  11. Strongly correlated systems are usually treated with model Hamiltonians THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS Conceptually one wants to restrict the number of degrees of freedom by eliminating high energy degrees of freedom. In practice other methods (eg constrained LDA are used)

  12. Two roads for ab-initio calculation of electronic structure of strongly correlated materials Crystal structure +Atomic positions Model Hamiltonian Correlation Functions Total Energies etc. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  13. DMFT Model Hamiltonian. + Exact functional of the local Greens function A THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  14. DMFT for model Hamiltonians. Kohn Sham formulation. Introduce auxiliary field Exact “local self energy” THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  15. About XC functional. • One can derive a coupling constant integration formulae (Harris Jones formula) for • Generate approximations. • The exact formalism generates the local Greens function and S ii is NOT the self energy. However one can use the approach as starting point for computing other quantities. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  16. Comments on functional construction • Atoms as a reference point. Expansion in t. • Locality does not necessarily mean a single point. Extension to clusters. • Jii --- Jii Ji i+d • Aii --- Ai i+d • S ii --- S i i+d • Exact functional G[Aii ,Ai i+d] • The lattice self energy and other non local quantities extending beyond the cluster are OUTSIDE the formalism and need to be inferred. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  17. Comments on funct. construction. • Construction of approximations in the cluster case requires care to maintain causality. • One good approximate construction is the cellular DMFT: a) take a supercell of the desired range,b) • c) obtain estimate of the lattice self energy by restoring translational symmetry. • Many other cluster approximations (eg. DCA, the use of lattice self energy in self consitency condition, restrictions of BK functional, etc. exist). Causality and classical limit of these methods has recently been clarified [ G Biroli O Parcollet and GK] THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  18. Lattice and cluster self energies THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  19. Mapping onto impurity models. • The local Greens function A, and the auxilliary quantity S, can be computed from the solution of an impurity model that describes the effects of the rest of the lattice on the on a selected central site. • One can arrive at the same concept via the cavity construction. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  20. DMFT Impurity cavity construction THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  21. Solving the DMFT equations • Wide variety of computational tools (QMC,ED….)Analytical Methods • Review: A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg Rev. Mod. Phys. 68,13 (1996)] THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  22. Two roads for ab-initio calculation of electronic structure of strongly correlated materials Crystal structure +Atomic positions Model Hamiltonian Correlation Functions Total Energies etc. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  23. Start with the TOE THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  24. Rewrite the TOE as an electron boson problem. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  25. Build effective action for the local greens functions of the fermion and Bose field • r=R+r • R unit cell vector • r position within the unit cell. Ir>=|R, r> • Couple sources to THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  26. Legendre transfor the sources, eliminating the field f, Build exact functional of the correlation functionsW(r R,r’ R) and G (r R,r’ R) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  27. “Kohn Sham “ decomposition. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  28. (E)DMFT pproximation to Sum over all LOCAL 2PI graphs (integrations are restricted over the unit cell ) built with W and G Map into impurity model to generate G and W Go beyond this approximation by returning to many body theory and adding the first non local correction. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  29. Test on extended Hubbard model V/U=.25, P Sun and GK THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  30. EDMFT functional. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  31. Returning to many body physics. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  32. Take the solution of the EDMFT equations as an approximation for the TRUE local self energy, and add the leading NON LOCAL corrections to the self energy G_NL W_NL, as a correction. • Do it self consistently and as a one shot iteration G0_NL W0_NL and compare the results. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  33. Average Z vs U (P. Sun 2003) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  34. Z1: K dependent part of QP residue. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  35. Functional of density and local Greens function. G. Kotliar and S. Savrasov (see S. Savrasov’s talk ) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  36. LDA+DMFT References • V. Anisimov, A. Poteryaev, M. Korotin, A. Anokhin and G. Kotliar, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 35, 7359-7367 (1997). • A Lichtenstein and M. Katsenelson Phys. Rev. B 57, 6884 (1988). • S. Savrasov and G.Kotliar, funcional formulation for full self consistent implementation. Savrasov Kotliar and Abrahams . Application to delta Pu Nature (2001) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  37. How good is the LOCAL approximation: Exhibit A THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  38. C-DMFT: test in one dimension. (Bolech, Kancharla GK cond-mat 2002) Gap vs U, Exact solution Lieb and Wu, Ovshinikov Nc=2 CDMFT vs Nc=1 THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  39. How good is the local approximation ? • Single site DMFT study of the Mott transition, based on a study of the Hubbard model on frustrated lattices made several interesting qualitative predictions. • New experiments and reexamination of old ones give credence to that the local picture is quite good. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  40. V2O3 under pressure or THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  41. Mott transition in layered organic conductors S Lefebvre et al. cond-mat/0004455, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5420 (2000) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  42. NiSe2-xSx THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  43. Qualitative single site DMFT predictions. • Spectra of the strongly correlated metallic regime contains both quasiparticle-like and Hubbard band-like features. • Mott transition is drive by transfer of spectral weight. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  44. Schematic DMFT phase diagram Hubbard model (partial frustration) [observation of temperature dependent transfer of spectral weight in optics] M. Rozenberg G. Kotliar H. Kajueter G Tahomas D. Rapkikne J Honig and P Metcalf Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 105 (1995) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  45. Insights from DMFT • The Mott transition is driven by transfer of spectral weight from low to high energy as we approach the localized phase • Control parameters: doping, temperature,pressure… THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  46. Evolution of the Spectral Function with Temperature Anomalous transfer of spectral weight connected to the proximity to the Ising Mott endpoint (Kotliar Lange nd Rozenberg Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5180 (2000) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  47. Schematic DMFT phase diagram Hubbard model (partial frustration). Evidence for QP peak in V2O3 from optics. M. Rozenberg G. Kotliar H. Kajueter G Thomas D. Rapkine J Honig and P Metcalf Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 105 (1995) THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  48. ARPES measurements on NiS2-xSexMatsuura et. Al Phys. Rev B 58 (1998) 3690. Doniaach and Watanabe Phys. Rev. B 57, 3829 (1998) . THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  49. QP in V2O3 was recently found Mo et.al THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

  50. Anomalous Resistivity and Mott transition Ni Se2-x Sx Crossover from Fermi liquid to bad metal to semiconductor to paramagnetic insulator. THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS

More Related