1 / 20

Enhancement of hadronic resonances in RHI collisions

Enhancement of hadronic resonances in RHI collisions. Inga Kuznetsova and Johann Rafelski. We explain the relatively high yield of charged Σ ± (1385) reported by STAR

ivo
Download Presentation

Enhancement of hadronic resonances in RHI collisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhancement of hadronic resonances in RHI collisions Inga Kuznetsova and Johann Rafelski • We explain the relatively high yield of charged Σ±(1385) reported by STAR • We show if we have initial hadrons multiplicity above equilibrium the fractional yield of resonances A*/A (A*→Aπ) can be considerably higher than expected in SHM model of QGP hadronization. • We study how non-equilibrium initial conditions after QGP hadronization influence the yield of resonances. Department of Physics, University of Arizona Work supported by a grant from: the U.S. Department of Energy DE-FG02-04ER4131

  2. Time evolution equation for NΔ, NΣ Δ(1232) ↔ Nπ, width Γ≈120 MeV (from PDG); Σ(1385)↔Λπ ,width Γ ≈ 35 MeV (from PDG). Reactions are relatively fast. We assume that others reactions don’t have influence on Δ (Σ) multiplicity. and are Lorentz invariant rates

  3. Phases of RHI collision • QGP phase; • Chemical freeze-out (QGP hadronization); • We consider hadronic gas phase between chemical freeze-out (QGP hadronization) and kinetic freeze-out; the hadrons yields can be changed because of their interactions; M. Bleicher and J.Aichelin, Phys. Lett. B, 530 (2002) 81 M. Bleicher and H.Stoecker,J.Phys.G, 30, S111 (2004) • Kinetic freeze-out: reactions between hadrons stop; • Hadrons expand freely (without interactions).

  4. Motivations • How resonance yield depends on the difference between chemical freeze-out temperature (QGP hadronization temperature) and kinetic freeze-out temperature? • How this yield depends on degree of initial non-equilibrium? • Explain yields ratios observed in experiment .

  5. Distribution functions for in the rest frame of heat bath Multiplicity of resonance: where xi=mi /T; K2(x) is Bessel function; giis particle i degeneracy; Υiis particle fugacity, i = N, Δ, Σ, Λ;

  6. Equations for Lorentz invariant rates

  7. Bose enhancement factor: Fermi blocking factor: using energy conservation and time reversal symmetry: we obtained:

  8. We obtained: I. Kuznetsova, T. Kodama and J. Rafelski, ``Chemical Equilibration Involving Decaying Particles at Finite Temperature '' in preparation. • Equilibrium condition: • is global chemical equilibrium. • If in initial state then Δ production is dominant. • If in initial state then Δ decay is dominant.

  9. We don’t know decay rate, we know decay width or decay time in vacuum τΔvac =1/Γ. We can write time evolution equation as where is decay time in medium For Boltzmann distributions: We assume that no medium effects, τΔ≈τΔvac

  10. Model assumptions • Δ(1232) ↔ N π is fast. Other reactions do not influence Δ yield or • The same for Σ(1385)↔Λπ • Large multiplicity of pions does not change in reactions • Most entropy is in pions and entropy is conserved during expansion of hadrons as

  11. Equation for ΥΔ(Σ) τis time in fluid element comoving frame.

  12. Expansion of hadronic phase • Growth of transverse dimension: • Taking we obtain: is expansion velocity At hadronization time τh:

  13. Solution for ΥΔ Using particles number conservation: Δ + N = N0tot we obtain equation : where The solution of equation is:

  14. Non-equilibrium QGP hadronization • γq is light quark fugacity after hadronization • Entropy conservation fixes γq (≠1). • Strangeness conservation fixes γs (≠1). • γq is between 1.6 for T=140 MeV and 1 for T=180 MeV; • Initially and Δ (Σ) production is dominant

  15. Temperature as a function of time τ

  16. The ratios NΔ/NΔ0, NN/NN0 as a function of T • NΔincreases during expansion after hadronization when γq>1 (ΥΔ< ΥNΥπ) until it reaches equilibrium. After that it decreases (delta decays) because of expansion. Opposite situation is with NN. If γq =1, there is no Δ enhancement, Δ only decays with expansion.

  17. NΔ/Ntot ratio as a function of T. • Ntot (observable) is total multiplicity of resonances which decay to N. • Dot-dashed line is if we have only QGP freeze-out. • Doted line (SHARE) is similar to dot-dashed line with more precise decays consideration. • There is strong dependence of resulting ratio on hadronization temperature.

  18. NΣ/Λtot ratio as a function of T Observable: Effect is smaller than for Δ because of smaller decay width Experiment: J.Adams et al. Phys.Rev. Lett. 97, 132301 (2006) S.Salur, J.Phys.G, 32, S469 (2006)

  19. Future study • Γ≈ 150 MeV; Γ≈50 MeV Γ≈170 MeV

  20. Conclusions • If we have initial hadrons multiplicity above equilibrium the fractional yield of resonances A*/A can be considerably higher than expected in SHM model of QGP hadronization. • Because of relatively strong temperature dependence, Δ/Ntot can be used as a tool to distinguish the different hadronization conditions as chemical non-equilibrium vs chemical equilibrium; • We have shown that the relatively high yield of charged Σ±(1385) reported by STAR is well explained by our considerations and hadronization at T=140 MeV is favored.

More Related