 Download Download Presentation Portfolio Construction

# Portfolio Construction

Download Presentation ## Portfolio Construction

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
##### Presentation Transcript

1. Portfolio Construction 01/26/09

2. Portfolio Construction • Where does portfolio construction fit in the portfolio management process? • What are the foundations of Markowitz’s Mean-Variance Approach (Modern Portfolio Theory)? Two-asset to multiple asset portfolios. • How do we construct optimal portfolios using Mean Variance Optimization? Microsoft Excel Solver.

3. Portfolio Construction • How do we incorporate IPS requirements to determine asset class weights? • What are the assumptions and limitations of the mean-variance approach? • How do we reconcile portfolio construction in practice with Markowitz’s theory?

4. Portfolio Construction within the larger context of asset allocation • IPS provides us with the risk tolerance and return expected by the client • Capital Market Expectations provide us with an understanding of what the returns for each asset class will be

5. Portfolio Construction within the larger context of asset allocation C1: Capital Market Conditions I1: Investor’s Assets, Risk Attitudes C2: Prediction Procedure I2: Investor’s Risk Tolerance Function I3: Investor’s Risk Tolerance C3: Expected Ret, Risks, Correlations M1: Optimizer M2: Investor’s Asset Mix M3: Returns

6. Portfolio Construction within the larger context of asset allocation • Optimization, in general, is constructing the best portfolio for the client based on the client characteristics and CMEs. • When all the steps are performed with careful analysis, the process may be called integrated asset allocation.

7. Mean Variance Optimization • The Mean-Variance Approach, developed by Markowitz in the 1950s, still serves as the foundation for quantitative approaches to strategic asset allocation. • Mean Variance Optimization (MVO) identifies the portfolios that provide the greatest return for a given level of risk OR that provide the least risk for a given return.

8. Mean Variance Optimization • TO develop an understanding of MVO, we will derive the relationship between risk and return of a portfolio by looking at a series of three portfolios: • One risky asset and one risk-free asset • Two risky assets • Two risky assets and one risk-free asset • We will then generalize our findings to portfolios of a larger number of assets.

9. MVO: One risky and one risk-free asset • For a portfolio of two assets, one risky (r) and one risk-free (f), the expected portfolio return is defined as: • Since, by definition, the risk-free asset has zero volatility (standard deviation), the portfolio standard deviation is:

10. MVO: One risky and one risk-free asset • With the portfolio return and standard deviation equations, we can derive the Capital Allocation Line (CAL): • Notice that the slope of this line represent the Sharpe ratio for asset r. It represents the reward-to-risk ratio for asset r.

11. MVO: One risky and one risk-free asset • With one risky and one risk-free asset, an investor can select a portfolio along this CAL based on his risk / return preference.

12. MVO: Two risky assets • With two risky assets (1 and 2), as long as the correlation between the two assets is less than 1, creating a portfolio with the two assets will allow the investor to obtain a greater reward-to-risk ratio than either of the two assets provide.

13. MVO: Two risky assets • Portfolio expected return and standard deviation can be calculated as follows:

14. MVO: Two risky assets • Remember that the correlation coefficient can be calculated as: Where and n = number of historical returns used in the calculations.

15. MVO: Two risky assets • These values (as well as asset returns and standard deviations) can be easily calculated on a financial calculator or Excel.

16. MVO: Two risky assets • By altering weights in the two assets, we can construct a minimum-variance frontier (MVF). • The turning point on this MVF represents the global minimum variance (GMV) portfolio. This portfolio has the smallest variance (risk) of all possible combinations of the two assets. • The upper half of the graph represents the efficient frontier.

17. MVO: Two risky assets • The weights for the GMV portfolio is determined by the following equations:

18. MVO: Two risky and one risk-free asset • We know that with one risky asset and the risk-free asset, the portfolio possibilities lie on the CAL. • With two risky assets, the portfolio possibilities lie on the MVF. • Since the slope of the CAL represents the reward-to-risk ratio, an investor will always want to choose the CAL with the greatest slope.

19. MVO: Two risky and one risk-free asset • The optimal risky portfolio is where a CAL is tangent to the efficient frontier. • This portfolio provides the best reward-to-risk ratio for the investor. • The tangency portfolio risky asset weights can be calculated as:

20. MVO: All risky assets (market) and one risk-free asset • We can generalize our previous results by considering all risky assets and one risk-free asset. The tangency (optimal risky) portfolio is the market portfolio. All investors will hold a combination of the risk-free asset and this market portfolio. • In this context, the CAL is referred to as the Capital Market Line (CML).

21. Investor Risk Tolerance and CML • To attain a higher expected return than is available at the market portfolio (in exchange for accepting higher risk), an investor can borrow at the risk free-rate. • Other minimum variance portfolios (on the efficient frontier) are not considered.

22. Portfolio Possibilities Combining the Risk-Free Asset and Risky Portfolios on the Efficient Frontier CML Borrowing Lending M RFR

23. Assumptions / Limitations of Markowitz Portfolio Theory • Investors take a single-period perspective in determining their asset allocation. • Drawback: Investors seldom have a single-period perspective. In a multiple-period horizon, even Treasury bills exhibit variability in returns • Possible Solutions: • Include the “risk-free asset” as a risky asset class. • If investors have a liquidity need, construct an efficient frontier and asset allocation on the funds remaining after the liquidity need is satisfied.

24. Assumptions / Limitations of Markowitz Portfolio Theory • Investors base decisions solely on expected return and risk. These expectations are derived from historical returns. • Drawback: Optimal asset allocations are highly sensitive to small changes in the inputs, especially expected returns. Portfolios may not be well diversified. • Potential solutions: • Conduct sensitivity tests to understand the effect on asset allocation to changes in expected returns.

25. Assumptions / Limitations of Markowitz Portfolio Theory • Investors can borrow and lend at the risk-free rate. • Drawback: Borrowing rates are always higher than lending rates. Certain investors are restricted from purchasing securities on margin. • Potential solutions: • Differential borrowing and lending rates can be easily incorporated into MVO analysis. However, leverage may be practically irrelevant for many investors (liquidity, regulatory restrictions).

26. Practical Application of MVO • MVO can be used to determine optimal portfolio weights with a certain subset of all investable assets. • An efficient frontier can be constructed with inputs (expected return, standard deviation and correlations) for the selected assets.

27. Practical Application of MVO • MVO can be either unconstrained, in which case we do not place any constraints on the asset weights, or it can be constrained.

28. Practical Application of MVO • Unconstrained Optimization • The simplest optimization places no constraints on asset-class weights except that they add up to 1. • With unconstrained optimization, the asset weights of any minimum variance portfolio is a linear combination of any other two minimum variance portfolios.

29. Practical Application of MVO • Constrained Optimization • The more useful optimization for strategic asset allocation is constrained optimization. • The main constraint is usually a restriction on short sales.

30. Practical Application of MVO • Constrained Optimization • We can determine asset weights using the corner portfolio theorem. This theorem states that the asset weights of any minimum variance portfolio is a linear combination of any two adjacent corner portfolios. • Corner portfolios define a segment of the efficient frontier.

31. Practical Application of MVO • Excel Solver is a powerful tool that can be used to determine optimal portfolio weights for a set of assets. • To use the tool, we need expected returns and standard deviations for our assets as well as a set of constraints that are appropriate for the portfolio.

32. Readings • RB 7 • RB 8 (pgs. 229-239) • RM 3 (5, 6.1.1 – 6.1.4)