200 likes | 409 Views
FARO EU Kick-off Meeting. Introduction to the project by Marta Pérez-Soba. Overview presentation. Project characteristics Project frame Aim Questions to be answered The Work Packages Challenges Time schedule. Project characteristics. FP6 STREP Scientific Support to Policies
E N D
FARO EU Kick-off Meeting Introduction to the project by Marta Pérez-Soba
Overview presentation • Project characteristics • Project frame • Aim • Questions to be answered • The Work Packages • Challenges • Time schedule
Project characteristics • FP6 STREP • Scientific Support to Policies • 11 partners (+ 3 sub-contractors) from 5 EU countries • Interdisciplinary team • January 2007 – December 2008 • 1 M€ • Scientific coordination: Alterra (NL)
1 Alterra 8 JRC 2 LEI 9 REDR 3 UoE 10 SRI 4 IAFE-NRI 11 WING 5 UNEW 12 MNP 6 UNIBUC-ECO 13 IGSO 14 Grupo Alba 7 WU Partners
Project frame • Policies related to Rural Development • Background: Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013 • User: EU policy makers (DG AGRI/DG REGIO) • Coverage: EU27 • Constraint: use existing pan European data
Aim: ‘The lighthouse’ To provide guidance for future rural development policies in Europe
Questions to be answered • What are major trends and driving forces affecting rural regions?
In Spain abandonment of agricultural practices from 1992 – 2002: 2 M ha agricultural land changed into forest, natural grasslands and no man’s land 1948 2001
Questions to be answered • What are major trends and driving forces affecting rural regions? • At which scales do they operate?
Scaling • Integrating socio-economic and bio-physical variables • Defining the appropriate spatial scale to combine all the variables considered in a meaningful way
Biophysical & socio-economic variables have a different spatial scale LANMAP2 NUTS-2 regions
Questions to be answered • What are major trends and driving forces affecting rural regions? • At which scales do they operate? • Which of these processes are amenable to change through RD policies and where? i.e. where EU support for rural development will create the most value added at EU level? • How rural policies might be adapted in the future to take account of these processes?
The Work Packages WP 1 Coordination and management ALTERRA WP 3 Institutions and the governance of rural development and the role of ICT NCL WP 2 Past trends and patterns LEI WP 6 Communication and dissemination ALTERRA WP 4 Foresight Analysis UCL WP 5 Integrated evaluation IPTS
Challenges • Describe the different ruralities in Europe
Southern Alps Lapland Scotland Andalucia
Challenges • Describe the different ruralities in Europe (the framework) • How governance and ICT influence RD (conference "Bridging the Broadband Gap: Benefits of broadband for rural areas and less developed regions": 14-15 May 2007) • Assess future uncertainty: conditional probabilistic futures (versus deterministic scenarios) • Integration of quantitative (model chain) and qualitative (SWOT) approaches • Case studies representative of the EU ruralities • Integrated evaluation of foresight results • Communicate science to policy makers
Project meeting 1 Project meeting 2 Final Project meeting Kick-off Project start Project end Workshops scenario Workshop validation modelling Workshop validation integrative analysis FARO EU time schedule (Meetings) 2008 2007 2009
Spatial Regional Framework Determine range of socio-economic indicators for NUTS regions Overlap NUTS regions with Environmental zones Carry out PCA by Env zones to identify best regional indicators Clusters according to variability Describe the average socio-economic and land cover characteristics Describe the average socio-economic and land cover characteristics Identify known inconsistencies Identify key issues for RD