AI challenges in Entertainment and Player Expression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ai challenges in entertainment and player expression n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
AI challenges in Entertainment and Player Expression PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
AI challenges in Entertainment and Player Expression

play fullscreen
1 / 43
AI challenges in Entertainment and Player Expression
Download Presentation
Download Presentation

AI challenges in Entertainment and Player Expression

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. AI challenges inEntertainment and Player Expression Doug Church AIIDE 1 June 2005

  2. Who Am I • Programmer by Schooling • Designer/Programmer by Training/Practice • Interested in Technology enabling Design Worked on (i.e. coded, designed) a bunch of old PC games, recently have been doing high-level goal setting/evaluation of (i.e. not real work) a variety of console games AIIDE '05

  3. This Talk Initially hoping to do an end-of-week recap kind of thing, discussing trends I saw over the course of the conference and relating them to current industry situations But turned out I was speaking first AIIDE '05

  4. So... Instead, I’ll talk about • AI related game design challenges I find most interesting as we head to next generation • My perception of how the state of the industry impacts AI work going forward This is a game design talk more than an AI talk Primary focus on single player games There are no pretty demos or pictures... sorry AIIDE '05

  5. Topics and Takeaways • Changing landscape in games space • How biz model messes with AI evolution • Rise of entertainment content • What experiences are we providing • Opportunities/approaches for meaningful forward steps in the industry, risks AIIDE '05

  6. Context Much is changing in the industry

  7. Changes in Market • Growing gap between top-sellers and the rest • Growing budgets and team size • Clear hook, 30 second experience pitch • Promise of direct distribution/ability to hit smaller markets with indie titles remains on the horizon, unfulfilled, but still discussed • Indie market would mean a very different talk AIIDE '05

  8. Changes in Development • Content the real issue (budget, time, quality) • Most games now content led not tech led • Data driven everything in order to get done • Get programmer out of way, tight feedback loop • Team scale impacting process, creativity • Getting everyone on same page • Creatively collaborate at large scale • Less discipline-based, more task-oriented AIIDE '05

  9. Changes in Gaming • For many years games were linear sequences of challenges • challenge itself as play-value/entertainment • “world” abstracted and simplified • Current trends • high world fidelity, and growing • open-ended worlds, player choice/customization • entertainment aspects/pacing, characters AIIDE '05

  10. Changes in Fidelity • Graphics: huge leaps in 20 years • Scale and density of environments increasing • Physics fidelity obviously much better • Even design has several new “common styles” of play (trading/collectibles, open-world mission stacks, etc...) • Conversation systems? not so much... AIIDE '05

  11. Changing Players • Online (XBox Live, etc) providing more multi-human gaming opportunities • MMO’s growing in popularity, providing large environments for “meaningful” player action • Single-player games containing more movie-inspired moments, more watching AIIDE '05

  12. The Mainstream Industry Getting Games Made

  13. The Industry Now • Consolidation: Fewer games, bigger budgets • Harder to get projects started, approved • Risk management central to business • Large public companies revenue driven, need big sales numbers regardless of dev cost • Licensing IP from other media, or sequel-ing established IPs, major part of forward plan AIIDE '05

  14. Evaluating Games • Player Fantasy: what experience is being delivered for the player • Key Pillars: game feature hooks for players to get excited about and promise play value • Uniqueness: competitive landscape • Reality Check: can it be done? on time? • market windows, competitive product timelines, budget analysis, dev team experience, etc... AIIDE '05

  15. Relevance to AI • Improved cover finding is very nice • Guys who don’t get stuck on corners are nice • Non-magical following of a racing line is nice ... none of these makes much of a 30 second TV ad, or a quick sound byte for Newsweek ... and if the character only lives for a minute, how much fidelity can we even perceive AIIDE '05

  16. Market Reality • Tons of interesting and hard work goes into making modern game AI’s able to work at all • but it is expected by the market, and really is mentioned most when it fails, not succeeds • Even in specialist press, we’ve basically bragged our way out of meaningful claims • “realistic characters respond to your actions” has been said for 10+ years about games • and often scripted stuff has more impact/is remembered more by players AIIDE '05

  17. The Result • AI code can be hard to build, and innovating and improving it is seen as risky • So potentially valuable/interesting features often cut as scope/risk reduction • Press/users outcry for better AI usually trivial • i.e. pathing and grenade dodging kind of things • hard work, sure, but not some new innovation • Hard to make case for future looking AI investment given risk profile and low ROI AIIDE '05

  18. That Said • Consumers do get excited when something combines new AI with new play idea/concept • Black and White, The Sims, first RTS games • Many of these had struggles to approve/release • Can we encourage/enable more of that? AIIDE '05

  19. What is needed to Pitch it? • Attach AI feature to compelling player fantasy • Identify and show a unique player experience/mechanic the AI feature enables • Some other pain point of development (cost, time) that the AI technique will improve • Evidence it wont require leaping off some 10-year research project cliff into total unknown AIIDE '05

  20. Technology Status What challenges? What can we do?

  21. AI Tech Situation • As fidelity of worlds (graphic environment detail, lighting, terrain complexity) grows, challenge of just keeping up ratchets up • pathing on a 2d tilemap with 90 degree walls easy • pathing on an arbitrary polygon mesh, not as easy • switching between idle and combat sprites easy • managing 100+ bone blended model, not as easy • and so on... • Just keeping old features working is hard AIIDE '05

  22. Some example AI Tech • Pathfinding • Map Analysis (cover, opportunity, shortcut) • Group coordination and management • Actions (climb rope, fire gun, plus world use) • Expression (what do i say, what anims...) • Senses • Traits and Characterizations AIIDE '05

  23. Some example AI Tech • Pathfinding • Map Analysis (cover, opportunity, shortcut) • Group coordination and management • Actions (climb rope, fire gun, plus world use) • Expression (what do i say, what anims...) • Senses • Traits and Characterizations AIIDE '05

  24. Enabling Players • Unique DNA of gaming is interaction • Currently, we provide lots of micro-interactions (move, shoot, dodge) • Lack of support for larger scale player choice • Hence drive towards online (where other humans provide the reaction to the choices) • AI is the obvious tool to enable more player flexibility and expression AIIDE '05

  25. Who Cares? • Plenty of games are fine w/current level of expression (Tetris works pretty well, etc...) • And movie style games are plenty fun • But we are missing out on a huge range of possibilities, and ones that are uniquely us • More reactive worlds with more payoffs and meaning to choices will be more human AIIDE '05

  26. Entertainment Aspects • Big moment payoff in FPS these days rarely comes straight from the systems/AI core • scipted overrides with hand-placed triggers/events • AI core supports the set piece by moving actors about, reacting and sensing, but that is it • Similarly in many other types... AI controls the mundane character actions, and then in big events the character is put into auto-pilot • Pure systems behavior often seen as flat AIIDE '05

  27. Entertainment and Reality • Often as our AI’s/NPC setups get better, they become worse as game foils • hard to tell what is going on, why • opaque actions, no sense of agency • Need better demonstrations of NPC traits • emotes, drawing attention, some sort of feedback • AI needed to support director’s goals and feel, not impose reality • AI to help pacing, variety, etc... lots to try AIIDE '05

  28. AI in Games What are we using this for?

  29. AI Styles we use a lot • Opponent • Simulates another human player • i.e. enemy fighter in SC, general in an RTS, etc • Manage • Simulates independent agents to attempt to direct • i.e. RTS troops, Sims in the Sims, B&W creature AIIDE '05

  30. Why these styles • Opponent • Strategize against player abilities • Pick challenges (shoot a guy who is in cover, chase a guy, drive faster than guy) and build AI around that optimization goal • Manage • Build systems based AIs with limited but repeatable capabilities • Gameplay about player learning to use them AIIDE '05

  31. Styles and Expression • Opponent and Manage provide clear expression for player in micro-actions taken • Presented sequence of small goals, have freedom on how to get there using toolset • Often provide a very small-task oriented approach to completion • Much like a job or homework... checklists AIIDE '05

  32. Styles we do not use much • Negotiate • limited use in RTS environments • Converse • very very limited conversation tree models, primarily, almost universally prescripted branching • Choice and Consequence • Occasional forays into faction based/multiple valid path, but mostly still save and reload based play AIIDE '05

  33. Steps toward other styles • Mercenaries • very basic faction model, and somewhat opaque and low on consequence (at least for first several hours), but still has NPC reactions to player choice • Fable • very shallow NPCs, but they pay attention to player actions and shade their opinion/behavior • Nintendogs • Ok, just another pet sim, but it is non-combat character interaction, and a nice “step” on a path AIIDE '05

  34. Design Challenges • Growing AI complexity makes expression harder in some ways • what were they reacting to? did what i do matter? • is he my friend or did he just not see me or am i wearing a disguise or maybe... • Add a complex behavioral/sensory model and getting meaningful player feedback is tough • Another reason pure opponent model is nice AIIDE '05

  35. Design Needs • What tools address this, can designers use them, what feedback do they get? • Tension between automated response and precise controls, where is sweet spot? • AI’s need to be Robust, Contextually aware, and Controllable... not an easy balance • Esp. as world systems grow in complexity • Getting good at this for micro-tactical combat setups... but not much for levels above this AIIDE '05

  36. Going Forward What are we doing?

  37. Optimistic View • Keeping up, AI can manage characters in increasingly complex settings • Games to keep moving forward • Complex settings give options for expression • More scope for entertainment as we can create more compelling and full worlds AIIDE '05

  38. Pessimistic View • Existing trajectory continues to evolve a small set of games, ignoring many more • Great, we master low-level tactics • No player-driven character interactions, scripting the choice for memorable entertainment moments • Single player games become movies with tactical/combat/physics challenges to “turn the page” to the next scene • Single player as “training dummies” for online AIIDE '05

  39. Proactive Response • Reality somewhere in the middle • Can’t wait for more interesting AI integration and adoption to “just happen” • Need to address current industry needs (entertainment, risk management) w/o giving up on pushing other AI types • Note: Nothing wrong with better pathing/etc, but is that all we can do? AIIDE '05

  40. So we need to get ahead • Finally good at doing games in Year 2000 • 20 person teams, static worlds, a few characters • Ooops, a bit late, eh? • Where do we need to get ahead • Tools: get on par with graphics/world fidelity • middleware? more sharing of tech ideas? • Tools: better blend of AI systems behaviors and “script-like” entertainment elements... • Risk: need manageable steps, solid path AIIDE '05

  41. Some Pain Points to address • Dev Costs • w/o better AI tools won’t be able to build content, due to pain of path management and scripting • Necessity of more complex worlds • if-then structures will become unmanageable, get more flexible and robust solutions going now AIIDE '05

  42. Opportunities to go for • New styles • Hard to make them work, but when you do, and connect them to a market, you are very happy • “Real AI” – planning, learning • manageable but meaningful steps into games • Entertainment • flexibility to allow big moments to be attached to real choices would be very compelling • Take gaming big moments back from the movie people, make them interactive AIIDE '05

  43. The End