1 / 14

Responsiveness to Intervention: The Positives and the Possibilities

Responsiveness to Intervention: The Positives and the Possibilities. University of Oregon April, 2006. Context: The Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Initiative. OSEP-Sponsored Summits & Roundtable OSEP-Funded Research Project IDEIA 2004. OSEP-Sponsored Summits & Roundtable.

isi
Download Presentation

Responsiveness to Intervention: The Positives and the Possibilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Responsiveness to Intervention: The Positives and the Possibilities University of Oregon April, 2006

  2. Context: The Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Initiative • OSEP-Sponsored Summits & Roundtable • OSEP-Funded Research Project • IDEIA 2004

  3. OSEP-Sponsored Summits & Roundtable • Summits: • May,1999: Keys to Successful Learning • August, 2001: Building a Foundation for the Future • November, 2001: Learning Disabilities • Roundtable: • July, 2002: Specific Learning Disabilities: Finding Common Ground

  4. OSEP-Funded Research Project • National Research Center on Learning Disabilities (NRCLD) Model Site Research Project.

  5. IDEIA 2004 • “Changes in Initial Evaluations and Reevaluations”: • Statute: 614(b)(6) • Proposed Regulations: §§ 300.307 through 300.311

  6. Responsiveness to Intervention(RTI) • Positives • Possibilities • Conceptual Model

  7. Positives • Prevent academic problems, and • Appropriate identification of students with learning disabilities.

  8. Possibilities • High Quality Classroom Instruction • Research-Based Instruction • Classroom Performance • Universal Screening • Continuous Progress Monitoring • Research-Based Interventions • Progress Monitoring During Interventions • Fidelity Measures

  9. High Quality Classroom Instruction Research-Based Instruction

  10. Classroom PerformanceUniversal ScreeningContinuous Progress Monitoring

  11. Research-Based InterventionsProgress Monitoring During Interventions

  12. Fidelity Measures

  13. Conceptual Model RTI Tier 1 ~80% of students Adapted from Tigard-Tualatin School District, OR Sadler & Zinn (2005) RTI Tier 2 ~15% of students RTI Tier 3 ~5% of students

  14. Q & A • What does the RTI approach mean for special education? • What are the potential roles and responsibilities for the parent centers? • How can we use RTI for special education summer programs? • Are there any best practice models for high schools? • Is RTI only for literacy, or math too?

More Related