1 / 14

AEB 6184 – Concavity, Capital, and Panel Simulation

AEB 6184 – Concavity, Capital, and Panel Simulation. Elluminate – 7. Concavity. Among the conditions for the production function are positive marginal product and concavity (positive derivatives and negative definite or negative semi-definite hessian matrix)

Download Presentation

AEB 6184 – Concavity, Capital, and Panel Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AEB 6184 – Concavity, Capital, and Panel Simulation Elluminate – 7

  2. Concavity • Among the conditions for the production function are positive marginal product and concavity (positive derivatives and negative definite or negative semi-definite hessian matrix) • As a starting point, I generate a sample of 150 observations using a quadratic production function.

  3. Ordinary Least Squares Results

  4. Eigenvalues • The idea is to resample the dataset, keeping the observations which are concave. • The alternative is to directly impose the constraint that the eigenvalues are less than zero.

  5. Production Function and the Theory of Capital • The student of economic theory has been taught to write where L is the quantity of labor, C is a quantity of capital, and O is the rate of output of commodities. • He is instructed to assume all workers alike, and to measure L in man-hours of labour; • He is told something about the index-number problem involved in choosing a unit of output; and • Then is hurried on to the next question, in hope that he will forget to ask in what units Cis measured. • Before ever he does ask, he has become a professor, and so sloppy habits of thought are handed on from one generation to another.

  6. The question is certainly not an easy one to answer. • Capital in existence at any moment may be treated simply as “part of the environment in which labor works.” (Keynes – General Theory). • We then have a production function in terms of labour alone. • This is the right procedure for the short period within which supply of concrete capital goods does not alter, but outside the short period it is a very weak line to take, for it means that we cannot distinguish a change in the stock of capital (which can be made over the long run by accumulation) from a change in the weather (an act of God).

  7. When we know the future expected rate of output associated with a certain capital good, and expect future prices and costs, then, if we are given a rate of interest, we can value the capital good as a discounted stream of future profit which it will earn. • But to do so, we have to begin by taking the rate of interest as given, whereas the main purpose of the production function is to show how wages and the rate of interest (regarded as the wages of capital) are determined.

  8. Development of Panel Data • The idea or transition is that the amount of capital stock may determine individual components about the production function. • For example, assume that we have three inputs. • The first two are variable inputs (labor and materials). • The third is capital. • Taking a second-order Taylor series expansion

  9. Next, allow the first two inputs to be variable while holding the third input fixed

  10. Playing just a little fast and loose with the notation, we collapse the point of approximation into the constant of the quadratic function and then allow differences in the level of capital as a shift variable

  11. Joan Robinson’s Point – Capital Levels could affect the marginal physical product of the other inputs

  12. Changes in Isoquants • Selection problem by farm typology?

  13. Differences in farm typology

  14. Rejoinder on Simulation of the firm under panel data (fixing the capital input).

More Related