1 / 31

Families Disempowered by Addiction

Families Disempowered by Addiction. Jim Orford Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling and Addiction Research Group, The University of Birmingham Unhooked Thinking, Bath, May 2007. The most common and damaging misunderstanding about drug dependency is that it only concerns the person using the drugs.

ira-washington
Download Presentation

Families Disempowered by Addiction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Families Disempowered by Addiction Jim Orford Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling and Addiction Research Group, The University of Birmingham Unhooked Thinking, Bath, May 2007

  2. The most common and damaging misunderstanding about drug dependency is that it only concerns the person using the drugs. Fergal Keane, 2007

  3. ADDICTION AND THE FAMILY (ADF) GROUP • The University of Birmingham/Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust Substance Misuse Service Alex Copello Ikan Ibanga Majid Mahmood Sherillyn McNeil Jim Orford • The University of Bath Mental Health R&D Unit/Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Rhea Armistead Lorna Templeton Richard Velleman Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  4. Concerned and Affected Family Members (and Friends) • Partners, parents, children, siblings, grandparents, other relations, friends, colleagues • Of close relatives and others with alcohol and drug (and gambling) problems

  5. FAILURE TO INCLUDE FAMILY AND NETWORK • Theoretical failure Critical, pathologising models Ambiguous models Partial models • Practical failure To minimise harm to affected family and others To enlist family and network support for change Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  6. Persecution Disaster Family unemployment Relative’s chronic illness Relative’s mental illness Relative’s HIV/AIDS In war zone Partner’s combat stress Relative’s brain injury Relative’s dementia Bullying at work Work overload ANALOGOUS FORMS OF STRESSFUL LIFE CIRCUMSTANCES

  7. UNDERSTANDING THE FAMILY EXPERIENCE • STRESS • STRAIN • COPING • SUPPORT

  8. Depre- ssed Humbug Sleep Eating Un- certain Signs of strain Stressful living Finance Threat to home Worry re relative Neglect Neglect Social life Perfor- mance

  9. FAMILY MEMBERS’ WORRIES ABOUT THEIR RELATIVES • Worry about the relative’s physical health • Worry that the relative is neglecting himself or herself • Worry about the relative’s mental health • Worry that the relative’s education, work or sporting performance is failing • Worry about the relative’s financial affairs • Worry about the frequency, quantity or form of the relative’s addictive behaviour • Worry about the company the relative is keeping Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  10. COMMON THREATS TO HOME AND FAMILY • Finances depleted • Atmosphere harmed • Home invaded • Social life restricted • Worry about children • Police involved Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  11. Family Members’ Ways of Coping

  12. A Mother’s Network Diagram

  13. Main Modifiers of the Core Family Member Experience

  14. SOME THEORETICAL LINKS • Stressful life events and chronic life difficulties (Brown) • Conservation of resources theory (Hobfoll) • Empowerment theory (Rappaport) Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  15. … it ought to be both surprising and shocking that there has been so little in the way of co-ordinated response to families living with the drug problem of their son or daughter, brother or sister. Marina Barnard, Drug Addiction and Families, 2007, p. 51

  16. TREATMENTS INVOLVING FAMILY MEMBERS (FMs) A. Working with FMs to encourage their relatives’ engagement in treatment e.g. Family ‘intervention’; Community reinforcement and family training; Unilateral family therapy; Cooperative counselling; Pressures to change B. Joint involvement of FMs and their relatives in their relatives’ treatment e.g. Conjoint family group therapy; Behavioural couples therapy; Family therapy; Network therapy; Mutual help organisations C. Responding to the needs of family members in their own right e.g. Concurrent group treatment; Al-Anon, Families Anonymous; Supportive stress management counselling; Parent coping skills training Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  17. PRINCIPLES OF THE FAMILY AND SOCIAL NETWORK ADDICTION TREATMENT SYSTEM • Serves the aims of both family harm minimisation and treatment of the ‘misuse’ • Flexible regarding point of entry and continuation of treatment • Takes an unambiguously non-pathologising stance towards family and network members Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  18. The 5-STEPS MethodFor Family Members in Their Own Right • Listen non-judgementally • Provide information • Discuss ways of coping • Explore sources of support • Arrange further help if needed Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  19. TRANSFORMATIONS DESCRIBED BY FAMILY MEMBERS RECEIVING 5-STEPS IN PRIMARY CARE • Increased focus on own life and needs (gaining independence) • Increased assertiveness over the misuse (resisting and being assertive) • Taking a calmer approach towards the misusing relative (reduced emotional confronting) • Increased awareness of the relative’s misuse problem and its effects on family members (cognitive change) Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  20. ISSUES ARISING IN THE USE OF 5-STEPS IN PRIMARY CARE I. Professionals • Identification and recruitment difficult • Cases often too complex • Difficulties of practice roles and time available II. Family Members • Material needed earlier • Material not directive or powerful enough • May not impact the ‘misuse’ Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  21. Social Behaviour and Network Therapy:To Provide Support for Using Relatives • Always ‘think network’ • Draw a network diagram • Invite members of the network • Strengthen the network • Discuss themes of: communication, coping, information, joint activities • Work with any part of the network • Plan for the future Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  22. Benefits from SBNT include: • Improved understanding from ‘network members’ • Increased open communication • More support and helpful control for focal clients • Reduced exposure to social support for continued alcohol/drug misuse

  23. ISSUES ARISING IN THE USE OF SBNT WITH DRUG PROBLEMS Identifying any positive network support Deciding who makes for the most supportive network members: parents, siblings, friends, others? Improving communication about drug use in the network Dealing with confidentiality Birmingham Alcohol, Drugs, Gambling & Addiction Research Group

  24. A Wife Worried about her Alcohol Misusing Husband

  25. A Father Worried about his Drug Misusing Son

  26. Four Options in Primary Care

  27. Generalised Network Diagram

  28. BARRIERS TO WORKING WITH FAMILIES • Individualistic philosophy Theories Policies Training • Contracts • Record-keeping systems • Advocacy

  29. A policy move away from framing the harms of problem drug use in individual terms towards their greater contextualisation within families would obviously carry with it many resource and organisational implications. Barnard, 2007, p.153

More Related