120 likes | 135 Views
Meta-Analysis Basics. Concepts and History. What is Meta-analysis?. Summary of quantitative results of empirical studies – data analytic part of a systematic review – data analysis where studies are data
E N D
Meta-Analysis Basics Concepts and History
What is Meta-analysis? • Summary of quantitative results of empirical studies – data analytic part of a systematic review – data analysis where studies are data • Can be used like any other statistical technique (e.g., to test a theory or moderator rather than to summarize) • Effect size – quantitative association of IV with DV • Model – an equation used to represent data • M-A Considers a distribution of effect sizes • Sort of an empirical sampling distribution • Mean of the distribution • Variance of the distribution • Accounting for variance in the distribution
Common Objectives • Show (and interpret) the distribution • Find the mean • Find the variance • Explain the variance • Look for problems • Bias • Outliers • Sensitivity to decisions about data
Goals for You • By the end of the class, you should be able to complete your own publishable meta-analysis. • Some students have published papers that came from this class: Allen, T.D., French K.A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K.M. (2015). Meta-analysis of work-family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 90-100.
Literature Review • Narrative – traditional, but less common now • Meta-analytic • Some do not distinguish meta-analysis from quantitative review. But meta-analysis is really just a kind of statistical analysis like regression. Meta-analysis uses ES, but regression uses individual data as observations. Most statisticians consider meta-analysis just data analysis where the studies have different magnitudes of errors.
Appropriateness of M-A • Empirical vs. theoretical • Quantitative vs. qualitative • Study outcome (level 1) vs individual data (level 0) • Single IV and DV for ES (congeneric measures – corr b/t measures of same IV or same DV should approach 1.0) • Same or similar design (e.g., do not combine experiments and correlations)
Common Effect Sizes • Correlation coefficient: r • Odds ratio (converted to logit): ln(OR) • Standardized mean difference: d
Main Steps • Find studies (Effect Sizes) • Code ES (convert if necessary) • Code study characteristics (e.g., date of publication) • Calculate distribution of ES (garden variety meta-analysis) • Examine ‘moderators’ • Sensitivity analyses (data and model) • Draw conclusions • Share (present and publish)
M-A Pros & Cons • Structured, open to replication • Superior to global impression & vote counting • Quantitative relations between outcome & study characteristics • Handles large k • Time & effort • Expertise in analyses • Missing data & bias • Exchangeability (apples & oranges) • Methodological rigor (all studies vs. ‘good’ studies)
Example in R • This course is not about R, it is about meta-analysis • However, we will use R to do meta-analysis • R is free • R is fairly easy to use • R can save a cluster of related commands – repetition • The ‘metafor’ package in R is really good • Many different meta-analysis algorithms • Many different publication-quality graphs • Many diagnostics just for meta-analysis
Dataset McDaniel • Metafor package contains several datasets. McDaniel1994 is a collection of studies in which employee interview scores were correlated with job performance measures. • The effect size is the correlation, r. N is the sample size. • There are also moderators for kind of interview • type = j, s, p – job related, situational, psychological • Structure = u, s – unstructured, structured • Download from Canvas & run in R
Easy, isn’t it? • The example I just ran is your basic meta-analysis. Simple to do, but you must understand what it means and whether the analysis is a good representation of the data. • That is why you should complete this course.