1 / 24

Purpose of Study

Assessing The Impact of Cross-Cultural Interactions Between First-Year students in a Learning Community and International students Presenter Gita Maharaja, Ed.D Duquesne University 23 rd International Conference on the First-Year Experience Session 11. Purpose of Study.

ingrid
Download Presentation

Purpose of Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing The Impact of Cross-Cultural Interactions Between First-Year students in a Learning Community and International students Presenter Gita Maharaja, Ed.D Duquesne University 23rd International Conference on the First-Year Experience Session 11

  2. Purpose of Study • Investigate the impact of cross-cultural interactions between freshmen in a Learning Community and E.S.L. students on cross-cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and self-awareness over a semester-long period.

  3. Significance of the study • Increasing need to prepare our students to be sensitive to and aware of cultural differences in our interconnected and interrelated world • Serve as model for other educators and administrators seeking to increase the effectiveness of interactions among their native and international student

  4. Definitions Cross-Cultural Sensitivity:Ability to experience cultural differences Cultural Awareness : Ability to adjust to cross-cultural situations Self-Awareness: Ability to learn about oneself as a result of the cross-cultural interactions

  5. Literature Review: On-Campus Cross-Cultural Experience • Global perspective – cultural pluralism, world-mindedness, support of internationalism, cosmopolitan world outlook (Sharma and Jung, 1986) • More accepting of diversity, desire to travel abroad and greater responsibility for foreign visitors (Stohl, 1986) • Personal Development (Wilson, 1993) • Interpersonal Relationship (Wilson, 1993)

  6. Literature Review (cont.) • Cross-cultural Sensitivity is a skill that can be learned through cross-cultural training (Bennett, 1986, Cushner and Brislin, 1996) • Cultural Awareness and Self-Awareness can be developed through cross-cultural classroom experiences (Fantini, 1997, Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J. & Wiseman, R. 2003, Wilson, 1993)

  7. Goals of Cross-cultural Interactions On-Campus • Help U.S. students to develop a more comprehensive understanding of their own culture and the culture of others. • Assist international students in adapting and integrating into the American culture and the culture of their host institution

  8. Conceptual Framework • Concept of Cross-cultural Sensitivity based on intercultural experiences (Cushner, 1986) Five dimensions:-Cultural Integration - Behavioral - Intellectual Interaction - Attitude Towards Others - Empathy

  9. Conceptual Framework (cont.) • Cultural Awareness and Self-Awareness based on cross-cultural adaptability skills (Fantini, 1997, Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J. & Wiseman, R. 2003, Wilson, 1993) Four Dimensions: -Self-confidence - Tolerance - Cultural empathy - Independence

  10. Research Questions • Are there changes in students’ cross-cultural sensitivity through structured interactions occurring over a semester? • Are there changes in students’ cultural awareness through structured interactions occurring over a semester? • Are there changes in students’ self-awareness through structured interactions occurring over a semester?

  11. Research Design • Method: Quantitative Study with a convenience sample; pre- and post-test design • Population: Freshmen in a Learning Community (27), English as a Second Language students (23) and upper classmen(6) • Instrument: Inventory of Cross-Cultural Sensitivity (Cushner, 1986) and Cross-Cultural Awareness questionnaire (piloted)

  12. Cross-Cultural Interactions • On-line interactions via Wimba Voice tools • Conversation hours as part of regular course works • Face-to face interactions in and out of classroom • Intercultural activities with the community

  13. Cross-Cultural Activities • Structured with specific directions - BafaBafa - Story Reading - Guest speaker - Critical Incidents - Barnga • Written and Oral reflections of cross-cultural experiences

  14. Demographics Variable Total Percentage Gender Male 25 45 Female 31 31 Age Group 18-20 38 68 21-23 12 21 24+ 6 11 Classification E.S.L. Only 9 16 Freshman 36 64 Sophomore 1 2 Junior 2 4 Senior 5 9 Graduate 3 5

  15. Demographics (cont.) Variables Total Percentage Nationality American 33 59 Non-American 23 41 First Language English 33 59 Other 23 41 Overseas Traveling Never 8 14 1-4 weeks 20 36 5-16 weeks 13 23 17-52 weeks 4 7 1+Years 11 20 Major Liberal Arts 38 68 Business 8 14 Other 10 18

  16. Statistical Data Table I: Paired Samples t-Test Comparisons of Cultural Sensitivity at the beginning and end of the semester Scale Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Pre-test Post-test t(df=56) p ____________________________________________________ Cultural Integration 42.98(7.97) 46.29(8.07) -3.162 .003* Behavioral Scale 27.55(4.49) 29.14(4.32) -1.999 .051* Intellectual Interaction 33.01(4.59) 35.27(4.38) -2.857 .006* Attitude Towards Others 13.28(4.93) 10.80(4.47) 3.625 .001* Empathy 22.41(3.30) 22.73(3.92) -0.649 .519 _______________________________________________________________ Total Score 139.25(12.70) 144.23(12.90) -2.571 .013* *p<.05 (statistically significant difference)

  17. Statistical Data (cont.) Table I: Paired Samples t-Test Comparisons of Cultural and Self-Awareness at the beginning and end of the semester Scale Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Pre-test Post-test t(df=56) p ____________________________________ Self-Confidence 34.36(3.57) 35.45(2.88) 2.075 .043* Tolerance 14.05(1.99) 15.59(2.32) -4.280 .001* Independence 21.79(3.50) 23.62(3.58) -3.454 .001* Cultural Empathy 14.60(2.07) 15.70(1.57) -4.312 .001* _________________________________________________________________ Total Score 84.78(8.59) 90.36(7.50) -4.697 .001* *p<.05 (statistically significant difference)

  18. Data Analysis of Cultural Sensitivity • Statistically significant difference found in: - Cultural Integration - Behavioral Scale - Intellectual Interaction -Attitude Towards Others -Overall Cultural Sensitivity No Statistically significant change found in: - Empathy

  19. Data Analysis of Cultural and Self-Awareness • Statistically significant difference between pre- and post-results in : - Self-Confidence - Tolerance - Independence - Cultural Empathy - Overall Cultural and Self-Awareness

  20. Limitations • Purely quantitative approach • Carry-over effect of a pre- and post-test research design • Duration of the research (one semester) • Cross-Sectional Research – data collected reflected feelings at one point of time at beginning and end of semester

  21. Recommendations • Mixed Method: Quantitative and qualitative for in-depth data • Explore other impacts of cross-cultural interactions between freshmen and E.S.L. students (friendship, compassion, and others) • Longitudinal studies • Comparison to a control group

  22. Conclusion • Cross-cultural interactions did increase students’ cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and self-awareness. • Efforts to create and implement cross-cultural activities for both E.S.L. and U.S. students are beneficial.

  23. References • Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In: R.M. Paige (Ed.), Educational Exchange for the intercultural experience, 21-71. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press. • Cushner, K. (2003). Human Diversity in Action: Developing Multicultural competencies for the classroom (2nd Ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J. & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27: 421-433.

  24. References(Cont.) • Fantini, A.E. (1997). New ways in teaching culture. Bloomington, IL: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other languages (TESOL), Inc. • Sharma, M.P. & Jung, L.B. (1986). How cross-cultural participation affects the international attitudes of U.S. students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 377-387. • Stohl, C. (1986). The A.M.I.G.O. project. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 235-254.

More Related