1 / 14

The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement

The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. An Enhanced Institutional Framework for Political Dialogue and Dispute Settlement between Ukraine and the EU Peter.VanElsuwege@UGent.be. Outline. A multi-level institutional framework Political dialogue Dispute settlement procedures.

ingo
Download Presentation

The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement An Enhanced Institutional Framework for Political Dialogue and Dispute Settlement between Ukraine and the EU Peter.VanElsuwege@UGent.be

  2. Outline • A multi-level institutional framework • Political dialogue • Dispute settlement procedures

  3. Multi-level Institutional framework (I) • EU-Ukraine summits (Art. 460) • Annual meetings at highest political level to provide overall guidance and discuss issues of mutual interest • Confirmation of existing practice

  4. Multi-level Institutional framework (II) • Association Council (Art. 461) • Regular meetings at ministerial level to supervise and monitor the application and implementation of the agreement + discussing any major issues and issues of mutual concern • Power to adopt legally binding decisions! (Art. 463 (1)) • Forum for exchange of information on EU and Ukrainian legislative acts – cf. legislative approximation! (Art. 463 (2)) • Updating or amending annexes – cf. dynamic evolution of EU law (Art. 463 (3))

  5. Multi-level Institutional framework (III) • Association Committee (Art. 464) • Regular meetings at senior civil service level to assist the Association Council • Power to adopt binding decisions, if delegated by the Association Council • Special role for the Trade Committee and specialised sub-committees (e.g. on SPS, geographical indications, on trade and sustainable development etc.)

  6. Multi-level Institutional framework (IV) • Parliamentary Association Committee (Art. 467) • Regular meetings at parliamentary level to exchange views and make recommendations to the Association Council • Civil Society Platform (Art. 469) • Regular meetings at civil society level to exchange views and make recommendations to the Association Council • Civil society cooperation as integral part of EU-Ukraine relations (Arts. 443-445) • Civil Society Forum on sustainable development (Art. 299) • Parties ‘shall encourage’ involvement of civil society in social and cultural dialogue (Arts 421 and 438)

  7. Political Dialogue • ‘gradual convergence on political and security measures with the aim of Ukraine’s ever deeper involvement into the European security area’ (Art. 4) • Including a number of specific aims, inter alia: • Strenghten cooperation and dialogue on international security and crisis management • Foster practical cooperation to achieve peace, security and stability in Europe • Promote principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of frontiers (‘good neighbourliness’) • Strenghten respect for democratic principles, rule of law and good governance, human rights and fundamental freedoms […] and to contribute to consolidating domestic political reforms

  8. Fora for political dialogue (Art. 5) • EU-Ukraine summits and Association Council (Foreign Affairs ministers) • At level of political directors, PSC, experts and high officials of military institutions • Making use of all diplomatic and military channels in third countries, UN, OSCE and international fora

  9. Clauses on political dialogue (I) • On domestic reform (Art. 6) • ‘common values’ (rule of law, human rights etc – Art. 14) • On foreign and security policy (Art. 7) • Conflict prevention, crisis management and military-technological cooperation (Art. 10) • On regional stability (Art. 8) • Peaceful settlement of regional conflicts, ‘good neighbourliness’

  10. Clauses on political dialogue (II) • On accession to the ICC (Art. 8) • Cf. Opinion Ukrainian Constitutional court of 11 July 2001 (N1-35/2001) • On non-proliferation of WMD (Art. 11) • On disarmament, arms controls and fight against illicit trafficing of arms (Art. 12) • On combating terrorism (Art. 13)

  11. Dispute settlement (I) • General provision (Art. 477) • Formal notification of other party and Association Council of disputes concerning interpretation, implementation or good faith application of the AA • Not for Trade issues! -> special mechanism (cf. infra) • Consultations within Association Council, Association Committee and its sub-committees • Binding decision of Association Council • Right to take ‘appropriate measures’ if no solution after 3 months (unless violation of ‘essential elements’) • ‘appropriate measures’ does not affect rights and obligations under the trade chapter (unless violation of essential elements)

  12. Dispute settlement (II) • On Trade and Trade-related matters • Inspired by WTO DSM • Focus on consultations (Art. 305) • If unsuccesfull: arbitration procedure (Art. 306) • Special conciliation procedure for urgent energy disputes (Art. 309) • Compliance procedure (Art. 311 ff) • Relation with WTO obligations (Art. 324) • DSP under AA without prejudice to any action in WTO framework • BUT: no parallel actions! • Mediation mechanism for measures dealing with the chapter on ‘national treatment and market access for goods’) (Art. 327)

  13. Dispute settlement (III) • On regulatory approximation (Art. 322) • Where a dispute arises concerning the interpretation of an act of the EU institutions, the arbitration panel shall not decide the question but request the CJEU to give a ruling on the question. This ruling shall be binding on the arbitration tribunal. • For disputes relating to the approximation obligations in the fields of technical barriers to trade, SPS, service, establishment, e-commerce and public procurement

  14. Conclusions • Significant upgrade of institutional framework • Possibility to adopt legally binding decisions and amend annexes creates more flexibility • Enhanced political dialogue • International, regional and domestic political context • Sophisticated dispute settlement mechanisms • Legally binding, focus on compliance and uniform application

More Related