1 / 30

Tracking the Revolution in Health Information Technology

Tracking the Revolution in Health Information Technology. COPAFS Quarterly Meeting June 4, 2010 Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. Research Psychologist. Technologic Change. “The pace of change (in communication options) over the next 5 years will dwarf the pace of change for the last 50 years”

ima-king
Download Presentation

Tracking the Revolution in Health Information Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tracking the Revolution in Health Information Technology COPAFS Quarterly Meeting June 4, 2010 Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. Research Psychologist

  2. Technologic Change “The pace of change (in communication options) over the next 5 years will dwarf the pace of change for the last 50 years” Lehrer News Hour October 19, 2006

  3. Information Access “CDC used to be in the wholesale business of providing information to state and local health departments. We are now in the retail business, providing health information directly to individuals.” -- Dr. J. Gerberding, 2003

  4. Visitors to NCI Web site: Mostly patients and their friends and family Over 50% Patient version of PDQ summaries accessed twice as often as Health Professional version (user logs) Health care providers About 13% Researchers About 9% Consumer Demand

  5. Changing Health

  6. Health Communication in the Era of Information Technology

  7. Genesis of HINTS: Experts Recommend National Surveillance Program • Changes in health information environment • Usage across channels and sources nationally • Combine channel usage with knowledge, attitudes, behaviors • Build an evidence base for planners, administrators, communicators, practitioners, and policy makers Cancer Risk Communication: What We Know and What We Need to Learn - NCI Monograph, No. 25, 1999.

  8. National probability sample of general adult (non-institutionalized) population (18+) Surveillance vehicle: health information Research vehicle: access to health information → health English and Spanish 2003, 2005, 2007-08 HINTS 4 in planning stages HINTS: Overview

  9. 2003 and 2005: Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview List-Assisted Random Digit Dial (RDD) 2007-08: Dual frame/dual mode Mail, telephone Oversampling of minorities Jackknife replicate weights for variance estimation HINTS: Methodology

  10. Incentives and Imbedded Experiments to Improve Response Rates 2003 2005 2007-08

  11. Surveillance Knowledge, Attitudes, Behavior Source: Hiatt & Rimer (1999)

  12. Impact of Investments in Cancer Communication Source: Hiatt & Rimer (1999)

  13. Analyses on Effects of New Communication Environment • Attributes • Demassified • Decentralized • Interactive • Adaptable • Connected Source: Hiatt & Rimer (1999)

  14. HINTS: Selected Results

  15. Source / Trust / E-mail Communication Hesse, Moser, Rutten (2010). New England Journal of Medicine, 36 (2); 859-860.

  16. HINTS 2005 HINTS Measures: New Media Spread HINTS 2003

  17. HINTS 2005 HINTS Measures: Online Health Information Seeking HINTS 2003

  18. Support for Data Users

  19. HINTS Electronic Codebook

  20. Instant Graphs

  21. HINTS 4: Using Science 2.0 Capabilities

  22. Science 2.0: Collaborative Web Technology • Based on principles of: • Architecture for participation • Data driven decisions • Wisdom of the masses • Examples:

  23. HINTS-GEM: Using Science 2.0 for Public Solicitation/Vetting of Survey Items

  24. HINTS-GEM Phase II: Proposing Alternatives and Seeking Comments Comments: May need to differentiate between receiving and sending Tweets.

  25. Phase III: Rating Final Versions of Constructs and Items

  26. Phase IV: View Final Versions of Constructs and Items with Ratings

  27. Grid Enabled Measures (GEM): Science 2.0 • Overall Goals: • To facilitate a virtual community of scientists using collaborative web technology to: • vet and promote the use of standardized measures– based on theoretically-meaningful constructs; • share the resulting harmonized data. https://www.gem-beta.org/

  28. Connecting to DHHS Programs

  29. Partners and Populations: Extending the Reach Delaware Puerto Rico Guam Argentina

  30. Thanks! moserr@mail.nih.gov

More Related