1 / 51

Course Overview

Knowledge. The Brain. Course Overview. Acquisition (perception). Use. ch. 3: Vision . How are objects recognized?. -It looks easy but it’s not. ch.4: Attention. Object Recognition. Visual System Recognizes: Object Identities (man, woman, child, oar, lake) Spatial Layout of Scene

ilar
Download Presentation

Course Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Knowledge The Brain Course Overview Acquisition (perception) Use ch. 3: Vision. How are objects recognized? -It looks easy but it’s not ch.4: Attention.

  2. Object Recognition

  3. Visual System Recognizes: • Object Identities (man, woman, child, oar, lake) • Spatial Layout of Scene • Properties of Surfaces(color, texture, etc.) • Are these real psychological dimensions? (What about Small vs. big? Alive vs. Inanimate? Tool vs. Non-tool? soft vs. hard? ) • - Are these dimensions processed independently by the mind/brain? (after all, our subjective experience is that of an integrated scene)

  4. Specific Disorders suggest functionally independent types of visual analysis • 1. Visual Agnosia:(object identity) • loss of ability to recognize objects • preserved ability to navigate, reach • Bilateral damage to occipital/temporal • Prosopagnosia (specific to face recognition) • 2. Balint’s Syndrome:(spatial layout) • inability to navigate, reach • preserved ability to recognize objects • damage to parietal areas • 3. Cerebral Achromatopsia (color) • inability to discriminate colors • distinct from color blindness--Color blindness results from abnormalities in the photoreceptors of the eye. But cerebral achromatopsia results from damage to posterior visual areas in the brain

  5. fMRI studies have confirmed the anatomical Segregation of these functions • 1. Object recognition:(lateral occipital cortex) • face recognition (medio-temporal) • 2. spatial layout and spatial attention • parietal areas • 3. Color • medio-temporal

  6. What is difficult about object recognition?

  7. 1. The visual system must carry out “image segmentation”, but object boundaries are not easily determined

  8. 3. Objects may occlude each other or they may be superimposed on each other.

  9. 2. Objects may appear anywhere on retina in any size A A A A + A A A A A A A A A A A Perhaps the brain is able to represent these objects in a way that is “translationally invariant” and “size invariant”.

  10. E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 4. Same object category (‘e’) may have different shapes E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

  11. 4. Same object (‘this door’) may have different shapes Perceptual constancy: Shape

  12. The many shapes of Hillary…

  13. 5. Object may be abnormally oriented Words: Moderate Effects Letters & Digits: Small Effects

  14. How is object recognition accomplished? Simplest idea: “Template Model”: Store in brain a copy of what every possible input will look like. Match observed object to the proper image in memory

  15. Template Theory Perceptual Representation Memory Representations

  16. Problems with Template Theory: (1) Massive numbers of templates are required (remember all those E’s?). (2) Predicts no transfer to novel views of the same object (unlikely for different retinal positions) (3) Objects are often obstructed (remember the baby?)

  17. Feature Analysis Theory A fixed set of elementary properties are analyzed Independently and in parallel across visual field. Possible examples Free line endings: +45deg. -10deg. Line Orientations: Different Sizes: Curvature: Colors:

  18. A Simple Version of Feature Theory E Perceptual Representation Memory Representation 3 Horizontal lines 1 Vertical line 4 Right angles 3 Horizontal lines 1 Vertical line 4 Right angles F 2 Horizontal lines 1 Vertical line 3 Right angles

  19. Evidence that Features are really basic elements of visual processing • Physiological Evidence • Individual neurons respond preferentially to different kinds of simple visual features • simple cells--respond best to lines or angles of a specific orientation and retinal position • complex cells--fire maximally to lines or angles without respect to location. They often also have preference for stimuli moving in certain directions… • hypercomplex cells--fire maximally have even more complicated sets of requirements for maximal firing. (e.g. corners, notches….etc.)

  20. Adaptation Effects are indicators of • elementary visual features... • Your eyes are always moving, even when “fixated”(microsaccades) • An image completely still on the retina will slowly fade from view, because • individual feature detectors become habituated (fatigued) with prolonged, sustained stimulation. • Retinal stabilization procedure allows direct demonstration of this • phenomenon.

  21. More Evidence for Features... In a Visual Search Task: (1)Targets defined by a single feature are easy to detect(the red item; the square) (2) Targets defined by a combination of features are difficult to detect (the red square). Let’s try it out

  22. Call out “now!” when you see the horizontal line.

  23. TypicalResults for “Feature Search” “No” Reaction Time (msec) “Yes” 2 4 6 10 20 30 # of items in display These results suggests parallel analysis and detection of simple visual features.

  24. Conjunction Search • Combination of features (e.g., red AND horizontal) • Spatial arrangements of features (e.g. black above white) When targets are defined by:

  25. Call out “Now!” when you find the black square above the white square:

  26. Treisman’sResults for “Conjunction Search” “No” Reaction Time (msec) “Yes” 2 4 6 10 20 30 # of items in display When higher order analysis or integration of multiple features is required, search is much harder, and reaction time rises with number of distractors.

  27. Detecting absence of a feature Look for circle missing the free line ending among

  28. Detecting presence of a feature Look for circle with the free line ending among

  29. How do we make an object out of a pile of features?

  30. Word Recognition: A Case Study • Frequency Effects • Word Frequency: Frequent words are recognized more easily • Repetition Priming:Words seen recently are perceived more easily • Context Effects • Word Superiority: Individual letters are easiest to identify when they are part of a word (work vs. orwk) • Well-formedness: Individual letters are recognized more easily as part of “word-like” stimuli than in a random strings of letters (lipe vs. lpei).

  31. w o r d An item will appear

  32. k An letter will appear

  33. Guess = 1/5 correct WORD WORK WORM WORE WORN Guess = 1/26 correct Word superiority WORD _ _ _ _ D _

  34. K XXXX D WORD XXXX K XXXX D RWOD XXXX K XXXX D D XXXX This “forced-choice” procedure controls for the effects of guessing, and confirms the validity of the word superiority effect.

  35. K XXXX D WORD XXXX K XXXX D ZORD XXXX K XXXX D D XXXX

  36. Interactive Activation Model explains the word superiority effect • Letters in words benefit from bottom-up and top-down activation • But letters alone receive only bottom-up activation.

  37. WORD WORK K XXXX D WORD K D features K XXXX D K D D features

  38. Spared slides

  39. A simple “feature net” model of word recognition TORQUE vs. •baseline activation: in the absence of direct stimulation. This is sensitive to recency and frequency of stimulation. •activation level: how active is a particular detector at a given moment •response threshold: how much excitatory input does a detector require before it “fires” and sends excitatory input further downstream.

  40. CQRN CQRN

  41. Interactive Activation Model (IAM): (McClelland & Rumelhart) Previous models posed a bottom-up flow of information (from features to letters to words). IAM also poses a top-down flows of information In addition, detectors at the same level interact with each other. Another important aspect of this theory is the presence of inhibitory connections between detectors that are inconsistent with each other...

  42. RAP Interactive Activation Model

  43. Interactive Activation Model explains the word superiority effect • Letters in words benefit from bottom-up and top-down activation • But letters alone receive only bottom-up activation.

More Related