1 / 49

CS 5368: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2010

CS 5368: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2010. Lecture 17: Machine Learning II 11/23/2010. Mohan Sridharan Slides adapted from Dan Klein. Recap: General Naïve Bayes. A general naïve Bayes model: Y: label to be predicted. F 1 , …, F n : features of each instance. Y. F 1. F 2. F n.

ila-reeves
Download Presentation

CS 5368: Artificial Intelligence Fall 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CS 5368: Artificial IntelligenceFall 2010 Lecture 17: Machine Learning II 11/23/2010 Mohan Sridharan Slides adapted from Dan Klein

  2. Recap: General Naïve Bayes • A general naïve Bayesmodel: • Y: label to be predicted. • F1, …, Fn: features of each instance. Y F1 F2 Fn

  3. Example Naïve Bayes Models • Bag-of-words for text: • One feature for every word position in the document. • All features share the same conditional distributions. • Maximum likelihood estimates: word frequencies by label. • Pixels for images: • One feature for every pixel, indicating whether it is on (black). • Each pixel has a different conditional distribution. • Maximum likelihood estimates: how often a pixel is on by label. Y Y W1 W2 Wn F0,0 F0,1 Fn,n

  4. Real NB: Smoothing • Odds ratios without smoothing: south-west : inf nation : inf morally : inf nicely : inf extent : inf ... screens : inf minute : inf guaranteed : inf $205.00 : inf delivery : inf ...

  5. Real NB: Smoothing • Odds ratios after smoothing: helvetica : 11.4 seems : 10.8 group : 10.2 ago : 8.4 areas : 8.3 ... verdana : 28.8 Credit : 28.4 ORDER : 27.2 <FONT> : 26.9 money : 26.5 ... Do these make more sense?

  6. Feature Extractors • Features: anything you can compute about the input. • A feature extractor maps inputs to feature vectors: • Many classifiers take feature vectors as inputs. • Feature vectors usually very sparse, use sparse encodings (i.e. only represent non-zero keys). Dear Sir. First, I must solicit your confidence in this transaction, this is by virture of its nature as being utterly confidencial and top secret. … W=dear : 1 W=sir : 1 W=this : 2 ... W=wish : 0 ... MISSPELLED : 2 YOUR_NAME : 1 ALL_CAPS : 0 NUM_URLS : 0 ...

  7. Generative vs. Discriminative • Generative classifiers: • E.g. naïve Bayes. • A causal model with evidence variables. • Query model for causes given evidence. • Discriminative classifiers: • No causal model, no Bayes rule, often no probabilities at all! • Try to predict the label Y directly from X. • Robust, accurate with varied features. • Loosely: mistake driven rather than model driven!

  8. Some (Simplified) Biology • Very loose inspiration: human neurons 

  9. Linear Classifiers • Inputs are feature values. • Each feature has a weight. • Sum is the activation: • If the activation is: • Positive, output +1. • Negative, output -1. w1  f1 w2 >0? f2 w3 f3

  10. Example: Spam • Imagine 4 features (spam is “positive” class): • Free (number of occurrences of “free”). • Money (occurrences of “money”). • BIAS (intercept, always has value 1). BIAS : 1 free : 1 money : 1 ... BIAS : -3 free : 4 money : 2 ... “free money”

  11. Binary Decision Rule • In the space of feature vectors: • Examples are points. • Any weight vector is a hyperplane. • One side corresponds to Y=+1. • Other corresponds to Y=-1. money 2 +1 = SPAM 1 BIAS : -3 free : 4 money : 2 ... free 0 -1 = HAM 0 1

  12. Binary Perceptron Update • Start with zero weights. • For each training instance: • Classify with current weights: • If correct (i.e., y=y*), no change! • If wrong: adjust the weight vector by adding or subtracting the feature vector. Subtract if y* is -1.

  13. Multiclass Decision Rule • If we have more than two classes: • Have a weight vector for each class: • Calculate an activation for each class: • Highest activation wins

  14. Example BIAS : 1 win : 1 game : 0 vote : 1 the : 1 ... “win the vote” BIAS : -2 win : 4 game : 4 vote : 0 the : 0 ... BIAS : 1 win : 2 game : 0 vote : 4 the : 0 ... BIAS : 2 win : 0 game : 2 vote : 0 the : 0 ...

  15. The Perceptron Update Rule • Start with zero weights. • Consider training instances one by one. • Classify with current weights: • If correct, no change! • If wrong: lower weight of wrong answer, raise weight of right answer.

  16. Example “win the vote” “win the election” “win the game” BIAS : win : game : vote : the : ... BIAS : win : game : vote : the : ... BIAS : win : game : vote : the : ...

  17. Examples: Perceptron • Separable case:

  18. Mistake-Driven Classification Training Data • For Naïve Bayes: • Parameters from data statistics. • Parameters: causal interpretation. • Training: one pass through the data. • For the perceptron: • Parameters from reactions to mistakes. • Parameters: discriminative interpretation. • Training: go through the data until held-out accuracy maxes out. Held-Out Data Test Data

  19. Properties of Perceptrons Separable • Separability: some parameters get the training set perfectly correct! • Convergence: if the training is separable, perceptron will eventually converge (binary case). • Mistake Bound: the maximum number of mistakes (binary case) related to the margin or degree of separability. Non-Separable

  20. Examples: Perceptron • Non-Separable case:

  21. Issues with Perceptrons • Overtraining: test / held-out accuracy usually rises, then falls! • Overtraining is not quite as bad as overfitting, but is similar. • Regularization: if the data is not separable, weights might thrash around. • Averaging weight vectors over time can help (averaged perceptron). • Mediocre generalization: finds a “barely” separating solution.

  22. Fixing the Perceptron • Idea: adjust the weight update to mitigate these effects. • MIRA*: choose an update size that fixes the current mistake… • … but, minimizes the change to w. • The +1 helps to generalize. * Margin Infused Relaxed Algorithm

  23. Minimum Correcting Update min not =0, or would not have made an error, so min will be where equality holds.

  24. Maximum Step Size • In practice, it is also bad to make updates that are too large: • Example may be labeled incorrectly. • You may not have enough features. • Solution: cap the maximum possible value of  with some constant C. • Corresponds to an optimization that assumes non-separable data. • Usually converges faster than perceptron. • Usually better, especially on noisy data.

  25. Linear Separators • Which of these linear separators is optimal?

  26. Support Vector Machines • Maximizing the margin: good according to intuition, theory, practice. • Only support vectors matter; other training examples are ignorable . • Support vector machines (SVMs) find the separator with max margin. • SVMs are MIRA where you optimize over all examples at once. MIRA SVM

  27. Classification: Comparison • Naïve Bayes: • Builds a model training data. • Gives prediction probabilities. • Strong assumptions about feature independence. • One pass through data (counting). • Perceptron / MIRA: • Makes less assumptions about data. • Mistake-driven learning. • Multiple passes through data (prediction) • Often more accurate. • What about Nearest Neighbors?

  28. A Tale of Two Approaches • Nearest neighbor-like approaches: • Can use fancy similarity functions. • Do not actually get to do explicit learning. • Perceptron-like approaches: • Explicit training to reduce empirical error. • Cannot use fancy similarity, only linear. • Can we create other similarity measures?

  29. Perceptron Weights • What is the final value of a weight wy of a perceptron? • Can it be any real vector? • No! It’s built by adding up inputs. • Can reconstruct weight vectors (the primal representation) from update counts (the dual representation):

  30. Dual Perceptron • How to classify a new example x? • If someone tells us the value of K for each pair of examples, never need to build the weight vectors!

  31. Dual Perceptron • Start with zero counts (alpha). • Pick up training instances one by one. • Try to classify xn, • If correct, no change! • If wrong: lower count of wrong class (for this instance), raise score of right class (for this instance).

  32. Kernelized Perceptron • If we had a black box (kernel) which told us the dot product of two examples x and y: • Could work entirely with the dual representation  • No need to ever take dot products (“kernel trick”)  • Like nearest neighbor – work with black-box similarities. • Downside: slow if many examples get non-zero alpha 

  33. Kernels: Who Cares? • So far: a very strange way of doing a very simple calculation! • “Kernel trick”: we can substitute any* similarity function in place of the dot product. • Lets us learn new kinds of hypothesis. * Fine print: if your kernel doesn’t satisfy certain technical requirements, lots of proofs break. E.g. convergence, mistake bounds. In practice, illegal kernels sometimes work (but not always).

  34. Non-Linear Separators • Data that is linearly separable (with some noise) works out great: • But what are we going to do if the dataset is just too hard? • How about… mapping data to a higher-dimensional space? x 0 x 0 x2 x 0

  35. Non-Linear Separators • General idea: the original feature space can always be mapped to some higher-dimensional feature space where the training set is separable: Φ: x→φ(x)

  36. Why Kernels? • Can you not just add these features on your own (e.g. add all pairs of features instead of using the quadratic kernel)? • Yes, in principle, just compute them. No need to modify any algorithms. • But, number of features can get large (or infinite)! • Some kernels not as usefully thought of in their expanded representation, e.g. RBF or data-defined kernels. • Kernels let us compute with these features implicitly: • Example: implicit dot product in quadratic kernel takes much less space and time per dot product. • Of course, there is the cost for using the pure dual algorithms: you need to compute the similarity to every training datum.

  37. Clustering • Clustering systems: • Unsupervised learning! • Detect patterns in unlabeled data • E.g. group emails or search results • E.g. find categories of customers • E.g. detect anomalous program executions • Useful when do not know what you are looking for. • Requires data, but no labels. • Often get gibberish 

  38. Clustering • Basic idea: group together similar instances. • Example: 2D point patterns. • What could “similar” mean? • One option: small (squared) Euclidean distance.

  39. K-Means • An iterative clustering algorithm: • Pick K random points as cluster centers (means). • Alternate: • Assign data instances to closest mean. • Assign each mean to the average of its assigned points. • Stop when no point-assignments change.

  40. K-Means Example

  41. K-Means as Optimization • Consider the total distance to the means: • Each iteration reduces phi. • Two stages each iteration: • Update assignments: fix means c, change assignments a. • Update means: fix assignments a, change means c. means points assignments

  42. Phase I: Update Assignments • For each point, re-assign to closest mean: • Can only decrease total distance phi!

  43. Phase II: Update Means • Move each mean to the average of its assigned points: • Also can only decrease total distance… (Why?) • Fun fact: the point y with minimum squared Euclidean distance to a set of points {x} is their mean.

  44. Initialization • K-means is non-deterministic! • Requires initial means. • It does matter what you pick! • What can go wrong? • Various schemes for preventing this kind of thing: variance-based split / merge, initialization heuristics.

  45. K-Means Questions • Will K-means converge? • To a global optimum? • Will it always find the true patterns in the data? • If the patterns are very very clear? • Will it find something interesting? • Do people ever use it? • How many clusters to pick?

  46. Agglomerative Clustering • Agglomerative clustering: • First merge very similar instances. • Incrementally build larger clusters out of smaller clusters. • Algorithm: • Maintain a set of clusters. • Initially, each instance in its own cluster. • Repeat: • Pick the two closest clusters. • Merge them into a new cluster. • Stop when there’s only one cluster left. • Produces not one clustering, but a family of clusterings represented by a dendrogram.

  47. Agglomerative Clustering • How should we define “closest” for clusters with multiple elements? • Many options: • Closest pair (single-link clustering). • Farthest pair (complete-link clustering). • Average of all pairs. • Ward’s method (min variance, like k-means). • Different choices create different clustering behaviors.

  48. Clustering Application Top-level categories: supervised classification Story groupings: unsupervised clustering

  49. More Information? • Machine Learning textbooks: • Christopher Bishop (PRML). • Tom Mitchell (ML). • Slides from ML course (available online).

More Related