html5-img
1 / 11

Designing for online assessment

Designing for online assessment. Getting started Ingrid Nix and Ali Wyllie (Lecturers in Teaching and Learning) 2 May 2007. Outline. Building on experience Building a process for production Designing to motivate Providing feedback Learner pathways (including statistics)

Download Presentation

Designing for online assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Designing for online assessment Getting started Ingrid Nix and Ali Wyllie (Lecturers in Teaching and Learning) 2 May 2007

  2. Outline • Building on experience • Building a process for production • Designing to motivate • Providing feedback • Learner pathways (including statistics) • Looking ahead

  3. Building on experience • Previous experience in OU – science, maths, OUBS using different (computer based) systems • History of paper-based CMAs • OpenMark sophisticated functionality, while Moodle catch-up • S151 Maths (summative online use) • Previous experience in own work: • used to designing exercises incl. computer-based (drawing on EFL language teaching background) • familiarity with range of exercise types e.g. text input, matching, multiple choice, use of visuals to convey meaning, etc. • interest in instructional design, use of media, student experience • awareness of needs of HSC students: supported, incremental

  4. Building a process for production • Driver: assessing ICT skills throughout SW degree at levels 1 - 3 • Word templates/ proformas for each question type • provide framework of requirements [see handout], feedback structures • authored by academic, built by programmer (+ designer input) • learning curve for all team, constantly improving on previous Qs • build bank of questions e.g. use of substitutable datasets (weighting affects % to be renewed each year if summative, per course or randomised per student individually) • Pedantic criticism is good! • edited while in Word (preferably subject expert) critiquing logic • developmentally test to find anything ‘grey’ before students do • course-wide adjustments can be made before scores released • (NB. difficulty keeping qs. up-to-date where changes occur regularly e.g. ICT skills, government policies, etc.)

  5. Designing to motivate • Typology created (framework of qs types) [see handout] to give range of approaches and pathway from concepts (knowledge) to skills (application) • thematically linked clusters of questions • linked sequence of questions to lead through processes • creating a learnable continuum of qs types to self-select from (see LINA project) • Building confidence through: • engaging designs, usability • relevant context • feedback to encourage next attempt • what makes Qs easy or difficult: e.g. # of options, quantity of info

  6. Providing feedback • Examples of approaches: • Generic across a question • Customised per option selected • Different technical approaches (ticks and crosses, wrong answers leap out) • Formative: generous, role is to support and teach, encourage to revisit • Summative: provide prompts to remind of previous learning • Future consideration: Confidence based marking • 1 self-assessment before seeing options • 2 self-assessment after seeing options but before answering

  7. Examples of questions and Feedback • [Show real examples online]

  8. CMAs for ICT skills (Social Work)

  9. CMAs for anatomy (Nursing)

  10. Learner pathways • Formative CMAs: different student uses of questions • Same day session repeating question • Subsequent days return to redo until get full marks • Repeat despite full marks • Statistics • [see handout]

  11. Looking ahead • COLMSCT CETL amassing OU experience, developing expertise • Teaching Fellows: • LINA project (Learning through Interactivity in Assessment) • integrating media e.g. audios • continuum of questions enabling student to self-assess what level question to attempt • ‘confidence-based marking’ – exploring its benefits • MAZE project • iCMAs within i-skills

More Related