1 / 32

Session 2: Procurement and E-Books

Session 2: Procurement and E-Books. David Ball. Summary. Consortia Procurement cycle E-books tender. Advantages of Consortia. Aggregation of spending power: Discounts Suppliers will invest to develop new services, e.g. shelf-ready books Savings:

Download Presentation

Session 2: Procurement and E-Books

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session 2:Procurement and E-Books David Ball

  2. Summary • Consortia • Procurement cycle • E-books tender

  3. Advantages of Consortia • Aggregation of spending power: • Discounts • Suppliers will invest to develop new services, e.g. shelf-ready books • Savings: • Competitive tendering process and contract management • Monitoring and improving quality: • Pool spend and knowledge about suppliers

  4. UK Library Purchasing Consortia • 7 regional consortia covering all UK HEIs • Procurement for Libraries – umbrella group; forum for determining appropriate level of procurement • Funded by subscription and staff resources of members • General university consortia – stationery, IT, laboratory supplies • Concentrated on hard copy: exploit competition between aggregators

  5. Southern Universities Purchasing Consortium (SUPC) • Largest of the regional consortia • 47 members – small to very large • All areas of university purchasing • Contracts worth over £100m p.a. (US$187m) • Framework agreements not central purchasing

  6. SUPC Library Group • Library contracts worth £33m p.a. (US$62m) • Books, including campus bookshops: • 4 suppliers • Discounts average 15% of list price • Pioneered fully shelf-ready books • Hard-copy journals – 2 suppliers • E-books

  7. Higher Education Agents • Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) • Non-commercial, funded by top-slice • NESLi2, JISC Collections • Eduserv/CHEST • Owned by HE sector, BUT funded by percentage of sales revenue • Collections of e-journals and databases • Both concentrate on e-resources: negotiate with publishers (monopolists)

  8. Differences from Turkey?

  9. Procurement Cycle • Identify the need • Prepare the specification • Tender to find suppliers • Award contract • Measure and monitor performance

  10. Identify the Need • Determine precisely what is required • On what basis – bought outright (hard copy), access (electronic), leased (LMS) • Consult users and librarians

  11. Prepare the Specification • Fundamental to any procurement • Informs suppliers of what is required, when, how, to what standards • Basis on which to evaluate and choose suppliers, and judge quality of service • Specify requirements, not detailed processes – allow for creativity by suppliers

  12. Find the Supplier • Tender evaluation • Measurable requirements from specification • Quality – accreditation, references, site visits • Ability to meet specification - functionality • Cost – comparable, whole life of contract • Weight each requirement according to importance • Award contract

  13. Measure and Monitor Performance • Essential to keep suppliers engaged • Contract management meetings – 2-4 per year • Performance measures from specification • Discounts • Supply times • Errors • Feedback from members

  14. Questions?

  15. E-Books • Existing heavy use of e-journals by undergraduates • Electronic medium the norm for students’ social and leisure pursuits • Electronic medium becoming primary in HE • Need for e-books

  16. E-Books: Problems and Obstacles • Lack of a clear open standard for operating systems; • Fears about the protection of content and the rights of the content owner in the context of giving users flexibility; • Lack of appropriate content in suitable quantities; • Pricing of titles, software and hardware; • Lack of integration into the general market for books. (Herther)

  17. E-Books: Current Developments • Google Book Project: • California, Complutense of Madrid, Harvard, Michigan, New York Public Library, Oxford, Stanford • Scan and digitise 16m volumes • MSN and BL – 100,000 volumes • Apple: • iPod book reader • Agreement on content with publisher

  18. E-books: Identifying the Need • Developing market place • Fluid business models • Mimic hard-copy business models • Trend towards bundling/Big Deal • Avoid what happened with e-journals – publishers determine business models; price tied to historical spend on hard-copy • Virtual learning environments

  19. Preparing the Specification 1 • Aim to provide agreements that: • Are innovative and flexible • Exploit the electronic medium fully • Focus on users’ needs not libraries’ • Encourage the addition of library-defined content • Agreements available to all UK HEIs, not just SUPC

  20. Preparing the Specification 2 • Two distinct requirements: • Requirement A – a hosted e-book service from which institutions can purchase or subscribe to individual titles • Requirement B – a hosted e-book service of content that is specified by the institutions

  21. Selection Criteria • Academic nature of content • Satisfactory authentication • Demonstrable benefits for consortium purchase • Customer and technical support • 4 suppliers selected out of 8: 3 general aggregators, 1 specialist

  22. List Price? • The 3 general aggregators offer pricing based on publisher’s list price • 1190 common titles from 4 publishers were compared • Many titles have no common list price in e-form • Average e-book price for the common titles varied from $99.9 to $102.2, a spread of 2.3%

  23. Prices: Hard Copy vs. E • One aggregator, offering outright purchase and only 1 simultaneous user, allowing for discounts and tax: • E-book: 155% of list price • Hard copy: 85% of list price • E-book is 82% more expensive • Book budget buys 45% less e-books than hard-copy books

  24. Price Comparison Year 1

  25. Price Comparison Year 3

  26. Relative Pricing • Purchase of 1500 titles: • Co. C 69% of Co. B • Co. A 63% of Co. B • Subscription over 3 years to 1500 titles: • Co. A 15% of Co. B • Over 10 years: • Co. A subscription 42% of Co. B purchase

  27. Bespoke Subject Collections • 2 aggregators expressed an interest • First subject – nursing; other subjects to be determined • Core list of 200 titles prepared by 4 universities, the Royal College of Nursing A maximum of 13% currently available • Aggregators have agreements with some of main publishers

  28. E-Textbooks? • Obvious advantages for libraries – no more multiple copies or short-loan collections; save on staff costs • However 80% of publishers’ textbook revenue is from students – not available

  29. Contract Award • Requirement A – ProQuest/Safari and Ebrary • Offer innovative models; value for money; flexibility • Exploit electronic medium in terms of granularity and multi-user access • Requirement B – Ebrary • Show flexibility and willingness to work openly • Investigate textbook models

  30. Lessons • Strong message to the market place • Flexible and innovative pricing models • Value for money • Reject the strait-jacket of hard-copy model • Exploit electronic medium • Libraries influence and select the content to be provided • E-textbooks move us closer to completely electronic provision

  31. Questions? dball@bournemouth.ac.uk

  32. References D. Ball. Managing Suppliers and Partners for the Academic Library, London, Facet Publishing, (2005). R. Everett. MLEs and VLEs explained, London, JISC, (2002). Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=mle_briefings_1. N.K. Herther. “The E-book Industry Today: a bumpy road becomes an evolutionary path to market maturity”, The Electronic Library, 23(1), pp. 45-53, (2005). D. Nicholas and P. Huntington, ‘Big deals: results and analysis from a pilot analysis of web log data: report for the Ingenta Institute’, in The consortium site licence: is it a sustainable model? Edited proceedings of a meeting held on 24th September 2002 at the Royal Society, London, Oxford: Ingenta, 2002 (Ingenta Institute, 2002), pp121-159, pp149, 151. C. Tenopir. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies, Washington, Council on Library and Information Resources, (2003). Available at: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf. dball@bournemouth.ac.uk

More Related