html5-img
1 / 13

Jenderal Soedirman University

THE IMPACTS OF AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENT IN INDONESIA: THE RICE SECTOR CASE. Jenderal Soedirman University. UNSOED. Brief Description of the Project :. Main focus: - Economic, social and environmental impacts of AoA

huy
Download Presentation

Jenderal Soedirman University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE IMPACTS OF AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENT IN INDONESIA: THE RICE SECTOR CASE Jenderal Soedirman University UNSOED

  2. Brief Description of the Project: • Main focus: - Economic, social and environmental impacts of AoA - Effects of interrelationship between AoA and Structural Dev’t Policies on Indonesia’s rice economy • Institution involved: Jenderal Sudirman University, BULOG, Wacana Mulia, Ministry of Agriculture • Key stakeholders: National Planning Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Farmer Groups, Local Governments, Traders

  3. BackgroundRICE is: • Main staple food • Consumed 130 kg/capita/year • Shared 21 % of HH budgets • Dominating rural employment ______________INDONESIA____________ • 1994  Net rice importer • 1998-2002: - Economic crisis in Indonesia - Radical trade liberalization

  4. METHODOLOGY • Stakeholder participation: - Stakeholders meeting: Minst. of Agriculture, Minst. of Industry & Trade, Minstr of Env’t, BULOG, UNSOED, Farmer Org, Land Research Institute, Wacana Mulia - International meeting in Geneva - SC meetings (Deputy Minst: Env’t, Planning, Agriculture, Foreign Aff, Trade & Industry, UNSOED) - Seminar • Analytical Method: - Economic Impacts  RRA, Interview, secondary data, I-O - Social Impacts  Interview, secondary data - Env’tal Impacts  Interview, secondary data, RCM & CVM

  5. MAIN IMPACTS IDENTIFIED BY IA • Economic Impact: - decrease in domestic real price of rice from Rp. 1,316 (1999) to Rp. 996 (2003) (-) - 261 respondents: 4% shift to other crops, 18% growing rice with reducing chemical fertilizers, 78% continue growing rice with lower income • Social Impact: - Local traditions & indigenous culture (-) - Poverty level (-) - Labor productivity decreased (-) - Urbanization (-) • Environmental Impacts: - Land conversion (-), water resource (-), Soil fertility (-)

  6. Main challenges: - Difficult to distinguish the impact of AoA & Stuctural Dev’t Policies - Difficult to understand, measure, & value the env’t services of the rice farming Improved capability in conducting similar/related project Opportunity to adopt env’tal service charge in agric land pricing MAIN LESSON LEARNED

  7. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS Government should : • increase total rice production & yield because it has significant impact on food security & poverty reduction • develop rice marketing infrastructures to reduce marketing costs  higher share of income to the farmers • promote small-scale, post harvest tech, & mngmt to reduce losses and increase famers’ income • support the development & application of IPM, soil & water conservation to promote sustainable agric dev’t • aware in issuing permits for land conversion  incl env’t function • Giving input subsidies to reduce production costs should be allowed by AoA since rice production is for domestic rice consumption.

  8. MAIN ACTIVITIES TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATION • Seminar & publication • Main actors involve: Dept. of Home Affairs, BPN, Dept. of Agric, Ministry of Env’t, • Activities taken not yet

  9. MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS • High attention and participation from stakeholders • More comprehensive information  awareness • Improved understanding & better communication inter-ministerial, inter-institutional, among stakeholders

  10. MAIN ACHIEVEMENT • Gov’t policy to reduce rice import, discuss ESP, encourage organic farming • Policy and stakeholders behaviour move toward more env. friendly • Improve capability of researchers in conducting similar projects on integrated assessment • Replication is none, but other projects (Green GRDP, NR based dev’t plan, valuation on mining project)

  11. CHALLENGES TO MOVE AHEAD • Political movement for democracy is on the first priority, env. on the last • Intergov. finance system ecourages resource depletion & env. degradation • Civil workers underpaid; leads to inefficiency

  12. ACTIONS NEEDED TO MOVE AHEAD • Continue discussion and dissemination of ideas • Government takes the lead for dissemination & policy dev’t (Min. of Env., BAPPENAS, Dept. H.A., Dept.Agr., BPN, Univ.)

  13. EXTERNAL SUPPORT • Funding studies for application of Env. Service Charges (what, how much, how to implement, institutions involved, stakeholders participation). • Encourage governments on the protection of environment and application of env. service charges through international forum.

More Related