1 / 21

Open government in Michigan

Open government in Michigan. Open Meetings Act Freedom of Information Act. Open meetings. Michigan Open Meetings Act Enacted in 1976. Why 1976?

hunter
Download Presentation

Open government in Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open government in Michigan Open Meetings Act Freedom of Information Act

  2. Open meetings • Michigan Open Meetings Act • Enacted in 1976. Why 1976? • Requires:- Public meetings of public bodies.- Public notification of meetings.- Opportunity for the public to speak.- All decisions and deliberations must be made in public.

  3. Public bodies under OMA • Any state or local legislative or governing body empowered to exercise governmental authority or perform a governmental function. • Applies only to legislative bodies. Does not apply to executive branch or courts.

  4. A meeting, defined • A convening of a public body- Where a quorum is present. What is a quorum?- For the purpose of deliberating toward a decision.- Or making a decision.- On a matter of public policy.

  5. Notification • Public bodies must- Annually post a list of the dates, times and places of regular meetings.- Post notice of special meetings at least 18 hours in advance.- Provide mail notification to citizens on request (press is free).

  6. Closed meetings • Meetings may be closed by a simple majority vote:- To consider evaluation, firing, suspension or dismissal of officials or employees, on the request of the official or employee.- To consider expelling or suspending a student on request of student or guardian.- To discuss union negotiating strategy.

  7. More on closed meetings • Can be closed by a two-thirds vote:- To consult with attorney about pending litigation (attorney/client privilege).- To review employment applications, on request of the applicant. Interviews and hiring decision must be made in public.- University presidential hires have been exempted from these requirements.

  8. This land is your land • Public bodies may close their proceedings to consider purchase or lease of real estate. Why? • Public bodies may not close their proceedings to sell or lease public real estate.

  9. Enforcement • Judge can void decisions made in illegally closed meetings. • First offense for intentional violation – fine of up to $1,000. • Second offense – fine of up to $2,000, up to a year in jail. • Lawsuits must be brought within 60 days of when meeting minutes are available.

  10. What’s going on? • If there’s a closed session on the meeting agenda, with no indication of why, go ask. • Explanation of why they closing is taking place should fall under one of the exceptions. • In general, governments that represent larger municipalities or deal with the media more are more experienced in these situations. Smaller governments may violate, unknowingly (or knowingly).

  11. MI Freedom of Information Act • Enacted in 1976. • Regulates requirements for disclosure of public records by public bodies. • Some perceive this as a law primarily used by journalists, but it is not. What profession uses the rights under this law the most?

  12. Public body under FOIA • Defined more broadly than OMA • Includes- Executive branch, state or local, except for governor and lieutenant governor.- Legislative branch, state or local.- Any other body created by and primarily funded by state or local authority.

  13. Public record • “A writing prepared, owned, used, in the possession of, or retained by a public body in the performance of an official function, from the time it is created.” • Applies to records that are handwritten, typed, printed, photocopied, photographed, “and every other means of recording.” • That includes electronic typing and recording, for example emails on a public official’s publicly funded computer.

  14. Exempt records • There are 20 specific exemptions. Here are some general categories:- Personal information, “the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of an individual’s privacy.”- Non-factual advisory communications within public bodies. For example, a staff member’s memo that states an opinion on something.

  15. Exempt records, the second • Investigative records that would- Interfere with police work- Deprive a defendant of right to fair trial- Disclose investigative techniques or the identity of confidential sources- Endanger law enforcement personnel

  16. Some more exempt records • Most student records. • Trade secrets. • Information subject to attorney-client or other privilege. • A nice legislative catch-all term: “Records exempted by other statutes.”

  17. Redaction • If a record is not itself exempt, but contains exempt material, the exempt material must be made illegible (redacted) and the record must be released. • Public bodies are supposed to try to keep exempt material separate from non-exempt material.

  18. Using the act • Identify the records you want in writing. Be specific. • Government body is required to deliver written response within five (15) business days.- Accept- Deny (with explanation of rationale)- Accept in part, deny in part (with rationale)

  19. Using the act and enforcement • Reasonable fees can be charged. • Right of appeal. • Enforcement - Penalties are milder than under OMA.- Document requester can use civil courts- Actual or compensatory damages plus $500 punitive damages.

  20. In general • Many times we find government officials pushing these to the max or keeping things secret beyond what the law says they can. • They may simply not know the law or their responsibilities under the law. • Lawsuits may be necessary to compel them to comply with the law.

  21. Questions?

More Related