1 / 26

PARC CWG

PARC CWG. Update. Presented to: SOCM/2. By: Tom Kraft tom.kraft@faa.gov Arnold Oldach aoldach@rockwellcollins.com. Date: 8-10 February 2012. Introduction. PARC – Performance based operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee FAA sponsored

hung
Download Presentation

PARC CWG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PARC CWG Update Presented to: SOCM/2 By: Tom Krafttom.kraft@faa.gov Arnold Oldachaoldach@rockwellcollins.com Date: 8-10 February 2012

  2. Introduction • PARC – Performance based operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee • FAA sponsored • Operates under the FAA Administrator’s authority by Code of Federal Regulation and FAA Orders • Reports to Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety • CWG – Communications Working Group • Operates under the PARC

  3. Introduction • Communications Working Group (CWG) • Premise – Performance-based framework • Project Plans – To provide executive summaries on the project (who, what, when, where, why and how) • evaluate communication technologies that are foreseen to be viable in meeting the needs of the aviation community • End product – PARC recommendations to FAA • Works with ICAO and the regions/other States to ensure global harmonization for seamless operations and interoperability

  4. PARC CWG priorities Based on practicality, timeline, benefit gain and level of interest, the PARC CWG priorities are: High priority – Performance-based concept for communications and surveillance High priority – FANS 1/A over Iridium SBD (FOI) High priority - SATCOM voice (Iridium and Inmarsat) Medium priority – FANS 1/A over HFDL (FOH) Medium priority – FANS 1/A over Inmarsat I4 Classic Aero (FOICA) Low priority – Other “non-project” specific work

  5. Other related work • GOLD implementation and amendment • 1st QTR 2013 – GOLD, 2nd Edition, target completion • See GOLD briefing for more • Linked to data link projects, e.g., FOI, FOH, FOICA • Inter-Regional SATCOM Voice Task Force (IRSVTF) • 1st QTR 2012 – Satellite Voice Guidance Material (SVGM), 1st Edition, target completion • Linked to SATVOICE project

  6. Other “non-project” specific work • Future/domestic data link, particularly in U.S. – SC­214/WG­78 next generation data link standards • New CPDLC message set underway (hot topic) • 12th Air Navigation Conference and OPLINKP • Supports global data link harmonization strategy for 12th Air Navigation Conference in November 2012 • ICAO Communication Roadmap and Global Air Navigation Plan is dependent on SC­214/WG­78 • What data link will be in aviation system block upgrade (ASBU) 0 in 2013, ASBU 1 in 2018, and beyond? • How will mixed-capable, e.g., FANS 1/A, ATN B1 (Link 2000+) and SC­214/WG­78, fleet be handled? • Phasing out and stopping partial builds

  7. PARC FOI & PBC recommendations PARC submitted letter to FAA in Sep 2010 “ RECOMMENDATION 1. [FANS 1/A over Iridium] (see previous slides) “ RECOMMENDATION 2. In the near and mid terms, plan for and implement a performance-based framework for RCP and surveillance performance specifications.”

  8. FAA responded in June 2011 “ The FAA accepts PARC’s recommendation to implement a performance-based framework for [RCP and RSP] specifications for oceanic and remote operations.” “The FAA will advocate global implementation … “… with the performance-based concept, any data link technology for ATS communications will need to conform to GOLD performance specifications as prescribed by airspace requirements documents.”

  9. RCP/RSP planning and implementation • North Atlantic – Implementation Feb 2015 • June 2011- Endorsed RCP/RSP implementation plan • Draft proposal for amendment to NAT Regional SUPPS (Doc 7030), agree by June 2013 • Asia-Pacific – Planning began in November 2010 • Sep 2011 – Ad hoc group formed to coordinate on planning • Feb 2012 - Seminar and SOCM/2 • On-going - ISPACG and IPACG planning for implementation • OPLINKP – Revisions to ICAO material, e.g., flight plan “P[n]” indicators

  10. RCP/RSP planning and implementation • Parts of concept are already being implemented • FAA currently monitoring performance at Oceanic Centers • Others, e.g., Australia, New Zealand, UK, Iceland, Canada, … • OPLINKP – October 2011 • Long term transition involving mixed-capable fleet • Performance-based framework needed • Extend into continental (domestic) environments • Advocate concept as part of NextGen, the ICAO Communication and Surveillance Roadmaps and the Global Air Navigation Plan

  11. GOLD performance monitoring Compliance action Data Link Continuous improvement Avionics supplier Aircraft manufacturer Satellite operator CSP Operator Network ATSP ANSP performance monitoring and analysis Regional Monitoring Agency Data Link http://www.ispacg-cra.com

  12. GOLD monitoring is not enough • Performance monitoring tells us if the system was “bad” yesterday • We need confidence the system will perform as expected today • Demonstrate stability of actual performance over time • Prescribe airspace requirements – qualify and approve components • Fix problems when they are found 6 Months ADS-C SATCOMNew York Oakland

  13. Continued operational safety • ANSPs need to continue GOLD performance analysis, regardless of sub-network media • FAA Flight Standards Service is planning to establish a system with U.S. operators to correct any performance deficiencies detected from this monitoring • Advocate other States to do the same

  14. FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI) Sep 2010 – PARC CWG completed project Jun 2011 – FAA responded favorably Follow-on work GOLD Performance Analysis – RCP240/RSP180 Corrective actions – like everyone else Performance-based See FANS 1/A over Iridium briefing for more

  15. Why SATCOM voice? Provides an alternative long range communication system (LRCS) to HF voice communications Dissimilarity (to HF voice) can improve overall reliability of voice communication capability Can improve quality of communications with flight operations and ATC, particularly in emergency and non-routine situations SATCOM voice is a requirement for extended operations (ETOPS) > 180 minutes Voice communications will continue to be a requirement

  16. An important “added” capability SATCOM voice • ICAO Inter-Regional SATCOM Voice Task Force (IR­SVTF) is developing globally applicable satellite voice guidance material (SVGM) • Feb 2012 - Seminar & IRSVTF/3 at ICAO Asia-Pacific Office in Bangkok • 1st QTR 2012 – SVGM, 1st Edition, will include guidance material on service provision, aircraft operator readiness, procedures for controller, radio operator and flight crew, and post-implementation monitoring • Indicate in-flight use of portable SATCOM phones is not allowed • Facilitate in establishing MMEL/MEL policies – but will not consider “no HF capability” • PARC CWG will contribute to validate SVGM and substantiate recommendations to FAA • Preliminary operational test with Air Tran, New York Center and ARINC planning to begin in December 2011

  17. FANS 1/A over HFDL (FOH) • Mar 2011 – PARC submitted report to FAA • Jan 2012 – FAA responded favorably • Follow-on work • GOLD Performance Analysis – RCP400/RSP400 • Corrective actions – like everyone else • Currently “turned off” FOH without SATCOM evaluations • FOH with SATCOM – about 1 - 2 percent • Performance-based

  18. FANS 1/A over I4 Classic Aero (FOICA) • PARC CWG completed project for FOICA project • Project report expected by 2nd or 3rd quarter 2012 • Plan Objectives • Ensure the new I-4 Classic Aero network is performing to expected levels per GOLD RCP 240 and surveillance performance 180 specifications • Work any issues that may arise out of the evaluation of data on this new network • Any recommendations to FAA are currently TBD

  19. FOICA current participation • Current participation • 21 operators/234 aircraft142 FOICA only, 92 FOICA w/SBB • ANSPs actively monitoring – FAA, Airways NZ, UK NATS, NAVCanada, others • CSP – ARINC and SITA • Airframe – Boeing, Airbus, Gulfstream, Bombardier • Avionics suppliers – Honeywell, Rockwell Collins, Thales

  20. Benefits of FOICA • New network • Continuation of Classic Aero over I-4 (Aero H+ only) • Now have 2 Classic Aero networks • Redundant interconnections between SAS & CSP • Compliant to existing Classic Aero over I-3 standards • I-4 Interconnects expected to be re-used for SBB Safety (2012/2013) • Prominent venue for I-4 Classic Aero performance against GOLD RCP240 and RSP180 specifications

  21. Next generation data link (domestic) • SC­214/WG­78, ICAO OPLINKP and 12th AN Conf • Global applicability/commitment to ATN B2 (next generation data link) • RTCA NextGen Advisory Committee (NAC) • February 2012 - Data Comm Task Group Final Report • PARC CWG potential work leading to FAA recommendations • Operating concepts and applications, e.g., DCL, en route CPDLC • Technologies, e.g., FANS 1/A(+), ARINC 623, Link 2000+ (ATNB1), VDL M0/A, VDL M2, • Expand the performance based concept to domestic data link to • Provide data link service to mixed-capable fleet • How many flavors of data link can we tolerate?

  22. Summary • Completed – continue on follow-up work • Performance-based communications and surveillance • FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI) • FANS 1/A over HFDL (FOH) • Planned for 2012 • SATVOICE • FANS 1/A over I4 Classic Aero (FOICA) • Potential future project(s) • Next generation data link (to include domestic data link) • Changes in membership

More Related