Rationing in health care. With indebtedness and gratitude to Joanna Coast, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, for writing a book, PhD thesis and presentation on priority-setting…… and for allowing me to plagiarise it all!!!!. Rationing in health care.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
With indebtedness and gratitude to Joanna Coast, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, for writing a book, PhD thesis and presentation on priority-setting……
and for allowing me to plagiarise it all!!!!
“The word [rationing] is invoked to make the flesh creep, not to prompt argument about how to deal with the inescapable”
Rudolph Klein, 1992
Price system - objective = efficiency
allocation by WTP/ATP
Non-price - objective efficiency or equity’?
who decides on allocation?
allocation by what criteria?
“Rationing in Great Britain has been implicit…It is a silent conspiracy between a dense, obscurating bureaucracy, intentionally avoiding written policy for macroallocation (rationing), and a publicly unaccountable medical profession privately managing microallocation so as to conceal life and death decisions from patients”
(Coast et al, Priority setting: the health care debate, John Wiley, 1996)
“... looked at the first two pages of that list and threw it in the trash can”
“... the presence of numerous flaws, aberrations and errors”
(Harvey Klevit, member, Oregon Health Services Commission)
1 Pneumonia - medical
2 Tuberculosis - medical
3 Peritonitis - medical/surgical
4 Foreign body - removal
5 Appendicitis - surgical
Bottom Five C/T pairs
705 Aplastic anaemia - medical
706 Prolapsed urethral mucosa - surgical
707 Central retinal artery occlusion - paracentesis of aqueous
708 Extremely low birth weight, < 23 weeks - life support
709 Anencephaly - life supportOregon List Version 2
+ combines pluralistic bargaining & technical exercise
+ applies ‘correct’ concept within data limitations
- problems with data - quality, absence, robustness
- subjectivity (bargaining) - who decides?
- what is the maximand - output=???
+ implied neutrality
+ clarity of objectives
inherent value judgements
weaknesses in methods
+ suited to uncertain and complex situations
+ decisions based upon compromise
heavily dependent on which groups are included
slipping back to implicit rationingAdvantages and disadvantages
(Evans & Wolfson, in Mooney, 1994)