1 / 39

Super BABAR Plans & Status

Super BABAR Plans & Status. David B. MacFarlane UC San Diego & SLAC 2 nd Super B Workshop in Hawaii April 20, 2005. Latest News from PEP-II & BABAR. First collisions in PEP-II early morning April 15 Began routine data collection with BABAR late Monday night

holzman
Download Presentation

Super BABAR Plans & Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Super BABAR Plans & Status David B. MacFarlane UC San Diego & SLAC 2nd Super B Workshop in Hawaii April 20, 2005

  2. Latest News from PEP-II & BABAR • First collisions in PEP-II early morning April 15 • Began routine data collection with BABAR late Monday night • PEP-II delivered up to 4.8x1033 on Monday night; improving rapidly • LER and HER trickle injection operational • Very fast start once collisions achieved; much faster than previous Run 4 startup • BABAR & PEP-II are very pleased & excited to be back in the game • Installed upgrades to PEP-II should allow at least 1.3x1034 • Upcoming run will extend through to July 31, 2006, with only one month interruption in October for PPS certification Super BABAR Status & Plans

  3. Outline • Summary of PEP-II/BABAR study of scenarios for Super B Factory • Try to give you a sense of the thinking behind our push to very high luminosity • Developments at DOE and SLAC concerning future of PEP-II and Super PEP-II/BABAR opportunity • Substantial change in outlook at SLAC & a potential opportunity to look at a collaborative effort on a Super B Factory Super BABAR Status & Plans

  4. BABAR Roadmap Study: Jan – July 04 • Defining physics case for Super B Factory • Primarily New Physics sensitivity in CP violation & rare decays • Capability for precision SM measurements as benchmark for New Physics • Requirements of viable project plans • Factor in duration of approval and funding process • Collider options and upgrade capabilities • Detector capabilities & requirements in light of machine parameters & projected backgrounds • Integrated scenarios for collider and detector construction, with implications for time to first data & competitiveness • Projections of physics reach in light of competition & other opportunities • Projections of samples & sensitivities; analysis of physics reach Super BABAR Status & Plans

  5. Physics Case for Super B Factory • Lots of work done, but everyone not convinced yet • Super B is not yet part of the US long-range planning for HEP • National Academy study could change this • Will compete with other physics opportunities in 2010-2015 • Most notably large-scale neutrino physics • Case rests primarily on ability to explore flavor physics couplings of New Physics • Complementary to hadron b experiments; perhaps natural successor • Perhaps our data is already hinting at New Physics, which will motivate further precision studies of flavor physics; perhaps LHC will see direct evidence for New Physics • Physics case may very well strengthen with time • Luminosity goals & physics timeliness a major factor as well Super BABAR Status & Plans

  6. Constructing a Viable Plan • What is the timeline for approval process? • What are the machine upgrade options? • Components development and replacements required • Flexibility for further luminosity improvement • Timelines for construction and commissioning • What are the detector system requirements and options? • Limits of existing detector technologies due to backgrounds • Modifications to existing technologies or possible alternatives • Impact on physics performance • Requirements for fundamental detector R&D • Uncertainties can impact approval process • Fit together elements into a coherent set of options Super BABAR Status & Plans

  7. LER vacuum +IR +HER vacuum, 952MHz rf Jul 04 Jul 07 Parameters for High-Luminosity B Factory J.Seeman Super BABAR Status & Plans

  8. Recommended PEP-II upgrades schemes I II III IV Detector requirements depend on projecting backgrounds for luminosities that are >20 times larger than at present Super BABAR Status & Plans

  9. Input from Detector Systems • Extrapolation of backgrounds with and without luminosity component; spatial and/or angular distributions if significant; • Performance degradation with occupancy and projected limits; likewise radiation damage and projected limits; • Any modest upgrades that will increase performance range or radiation tolerance; • Speculation about options for 5-10x1035 machines. What are limits of current technologies? Long extrapolation from current background studies, which include significant luminosity-dependent component at PEP-II Super BABAR Status & Plans

  10. Luminosity Dependent Backgrounds Luminosity term depends on IR design M.Sullivan Super BABAR Status & Plans

  11. SVT Backgrounds: Bottom module Assumes striplets increase granularity 4-fold B.Petersen, F.Forti Super BABAR Status & Plans

  12. Monolithic Active Pixels • Option for very high luminosity is MAPS = Monolithic Active Pixels = sensor and electronics on the same substrate. • R&D on MAPS started in several places, including Pisa • Possible approaches: • Integrate electronics on the high resistivity substrate usually employed for sensors: 4 times thinner total material • Active components are not of the best quality • The fabrication process is highly non-standard with large feature size (>1-2mm) • Use the low resistivity substrate of standard CMOS process as sensor • Can use standard sub-micron process with state-of-the-art electronics Far from a proven technology: fundamental R&D required Super BABAR Status & Plans

  13. DCH Occupancy Based on 2004 Studies 100% Lumi term 20% Lumi term 4 x cells 4 x cells M.Cristinziani Super BABAR Status & Plans

  14. Options for Beyond 2x1035 • Basic configuration is • Leave SVT geometry unchanged; replace DCH with 4-layer silicon tracker with lampshade modules. Remove support tube • Radii of barrel part of SVT modules: 3.3, 4.0, 5.9, 12.2, 14.0 cm • Radii of barrel part of CST modules: 25,35,45,60 cm Current detector All silicon tracker 60 cm F.Forti Super BABAR Status & Plans

  15. Present detector Future? Momentum Resolution F.Forti Super BABAR Status & Plans

  16. Occupancy Projections 1036 7x1035 2x1035 Is this a functional EMC? Versus ~8 physicsclusters EMC Background Projections Radiation Damage Projections Degradation of light output with luminosity EMC lifetime limit: about 20 ab-1 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  17. Radiation-Hard Calorimeter Options • Lutetium (+Yttrium) OxyOrthosilicate [LSO or LYSO] • Fast light output in 40ns; solves occupancy problem. • Smaller radiation length 1.15cm (CsI 1.86cm) and Moliere radius 2.3 cm (CsI 3.8cm) • Believed to be radiation hard to 100MRad! • Currently cost is ~$40/cc; pushes radius towards 700mm • Liquid Xenon • Fast light output again, within ~20ns. • Radiation length is 2.9cm: need all of radial space between 700 and 1350mm for cryostat, liquid Xenon and readout. • Moliere radius 5.7cm: long. sampling to separate overlaps. • Cost of Liquid Xenon is $2.5/cc Both Rad Hard crystal and Liquid Xenon options require EMC inner radius reduction to about 70cm: need to replace DRC bars as well Super BABAR Status & Plans

  18. SVT striplets Thin pixels Wire chamber Silicon outer tracker CsI EMC Rad Hard EMC+DRC bars DRC SOB replacement Summary of Upgrade Options LER replacement + HER replacement + 952 MHz rf [No x 2 for crabbing] 1.5 2.5 5.0 7.0 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  19. Scenario 1: Detector Upgrades • Replace inner layers of present SVT with radiation hard upgrade • Replace DCH with small-cell version and faster gas • Replace DRC SOB • Replace forward EMC • Replace IFR forward endcap Super BABAR Status & Plans

  20. Scenario I LER replacement Luminosity deadend SVT striplets Wire chamber CsI EMC DRC SOB replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 1.5 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  21. Scenario 2: Detector Upgrades • Replace inner layers of present SVT with radiation hard upgrade • Not much headroom with conventional strips • Replace DCH with small-cell version and faster gas • Drift chamber may not work at this luminosity and has no headroom • More likely we would have to go to an all silicon tracker • Replace DRC SOB • Replace forward EMC • Barrel EMC has limited lifetime of a few years • Replace IFR forward endcap Super BABAR Status & Plans

  22. Scenario 2: Unlikely Solution LER replacement Detector Limited SVT striplets Wire chamber CsI EMC DRC SOB replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 2.5 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  23. Scenario 2: More Viable Solution LER replacement Collider Limited SVT striplets Silicon outer tracker Rad Hard EMC DRC replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 2.5 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  24. Scenario 3: Detector Upgrades • Replace inner layers of present SVT with thin pixels • Replace DCH with all silicon tracker • Replace DRC SOB and bar boxes due to smaller radius for EMC • Not at all clear that DRC will work at these luminosities • Replace EMC with either radiation hard crystals or liquid xenon • Replace IFR forward endcap Fundamental R&D for thin pixels drives approval schedule and overall timeline Impossible to predict timeline for successful development Super BABAR Status & Plans

  25. Scenario 3 LER replacement + HER replacement + 952 MHz rf Technology Limited Thin pixels Silicon outer tracker Rad Hard EMC DRC replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 7.0 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  26. Scenario 4: Detector Upgrades • Replace inner layers of present SVT with segmented strips • Should be viable to about 5 x 1035 • Develop thin pixels and replace inner SVT at an appropriate time to go higher in luminosity • Replace DCH with all silicon tracker • Replace DRC SOB and bar boxes due to smaller radius for EMC • Not at all clear that DRC will work at these luminosities • Replace EMC with either radiation hard crystals or liquid xenon • Replace IFR forward endcap Super BABAR Status & Plans

  27. Performance limit Upgrade Plan: Initial 5x1035 Project LER replacement + HER replacement + 952 MHz rf SVT striplets Silicon outer tracker Rad Hard EMC DRC replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 2.5 5.0 7.0 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  28. Upgrade Plan: Ultimate Reach LER replacement + HER replacement + 952 MHz rf SVT striplets Thin pixels Silicon outer tracker Rad Hard EMC DRC replacement [No x 2 for crabbing] 2.5 5.0 7.0 x 1035 Super BABAR Status & Plans

  29. Important Factors in Upgrade Direction • Project is “tunable” • Can react to physics developments • Can react to changing geopolitical situation • Size of interested community, depth of financial support • Will emerge from BABAR and Belle, but could be attractive to wider community in context of other opportunities • As we learn more about machine and detector requirements and design, can fine tune goals and plans within this framework • Project has headroom • Major upgrades to detector and machine, but none contingent upon completing fundamental R&D • Headroom for detector up to 5 x 1035; with thin pixels beyond • Headroom for machine up to 8.5 x 1035; requires additional rf, which can be staged into machine over time Super BABAR Status & Plans

  30. Possible Timeline for Super B Program Construction of upgrades to L = 5-7x1035 Super B Operation Super-B Program R&D, Design, Proposals and Approvals 2001 2003 2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012 Construction Installation LOI CDR Commission P5 Planned PEP-II Program (June 30, 2003) (End 2006) (PEP-II ultimate) Super BABAR Status & Plans

  31. Scale change! Projections for Super B Factory f0KS KSp0 jKS h’KS KKKS Luminosity expectations: Super B Factory 5-7x1035 cm-2s-1 K*g 5s discovery region if non-SM physics is effect of 0.15 2004 2012 Projections are statistical errors only; but systematic errors at few percent level Super BABAR Status & Plans

  32. Comparisons: Projections for p+p- s(Spp) Lint Effective number of tagged events Error on sine amplitude PEP-II, KEKB Super B-Factory 10/2011 SuperB LHCb BTEV Super BABAR Status & Plans

  33. Lint s(d) Projections for 2-Body Isospin Analysis [Estimate: Summary of a range of errors depending on BFs, asymmetries] Effective number of tagged events Error on delta [degrees] SuperB Super BABAR Status & Plans

  34. Projections for K*g PEP-II, KEKB Super B-Factory 10/2011 Effective number of tagged events Error on sine amplitude SuperB Super BABAR Status & Plans

  35. Developments at DOE • Budgetary backdrop in US • US domestic discretionary budget is under enormous pressure for the next few years at least: 5-year projections are for 3.7% decrease through to FY2010 in then year dollars • Priorities for US program • Highest priorities at present are full exploitation of Tevatron, PEP-II, and LHC preparations • Intention is to make room for a new suite of mid-scale experiments to be launched in 2007-2010 time frame, following ramp-down of PEP-II (2008) and Tevatron operations (2009) • Focus is on accelerator and non-accelerator based neutrino, dark matter, & dark energy experiments • Coherent plan for Fermilab as the national HEP laboratory • ILC is the long-term highest priority for future major facility, with US site the intended goal assuming international support Super BABAR Status & Plans

  36. Institutional Future of SLAC • Shift in institutional funding & focus 2006-2009 • Major new $380M light source “LCLS” under construction 2005-2008: x-ray laser based on downstream 1/3rd of Linac • Additional beam lines later & use of full Linac (Stage 2) • SLAC will become dual purpose laboratory • Roughly 2/3rd light science funded by DOE/Basic Energy Sciences (BES), including entire Linac operation • Roughly 1/3rd HEP & particle-astrophysics funded by DOE/HEP • Consequences for future of PEP-II program • FY2006 budget request by DOE foresees PEP-II operation only through to end of FY2008 • When PEP-II shuts down, there will be no longer be any machine operating for HEP on the SLAC site • Major New Physics discovery might change this end date Super BABAR Status & Plans

  37. SLAC Planning for HEP • Plan presented by Jonathan to National Academy Long-Range Planning Committee in January • Long-term priority is to play a leading role in the ILC, independent of site • Follows guidance from SLAC scenarios studies • Follows strengths & technical expertise of lab • Follows SLAC’s long-term history of leading the push for linear colliders, as well as priorities of the field and DOE • Full exploitation of the PEP-II B Factory program, including physics output, through next decade • Pursuit of an exciting & growing suite of possible astro-particle physics experiments • Fill in behind the ILC long-term goal with a yet-to-be-determined new accelerator-based project after PEP-II Super BABAR Status & Plans

  38. Consequences for Super B Factories • Super PEP-II is not presently part of SLAC’s long-range plan • Does not fit with commitments to ILC & LCLS, or priorities from DOE in tight budget situation • Could change depending on success of turning ILC into an approved international project • Members of PEP-II & BABAR communities are starting to discuss future options • Super KEKB is a possibility for a core part of PEP-II/BABAR, depending on the strength of the physics case & competitiveness with other physics opportunities • New participants could lead to expansion of scope for the Super B project and/or a more aggressive timescale Super BABAR Status & Plans

  39. Conclusion • Ideas for Super PEP-II/BABAR do not fit in SLAC plans at present • Reflects changes underway to SLAC’s scientific mission, which is broadening in a big way into light science • Core parts of PEP-II/BABAR are looking at future options outside SLAC • Early in a process of examining international accelerator-based physics opportunities in the next decade, including Super KEKB • Concerned about competitiveness & scope of Super KEKB; impact of planned peak & integrated luminosity goals on ability to convince international audience of the importance & viability of the project • See this meeting potentially as part of a process of re-examining scope, assuming we factor in the possibility for additional US and/or European contributions to the project Super BABAR Status & Plans

More Related