1 / 20

Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost?

Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost?. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 446-57 R4 김용일. Positive pressure ventilation. Copenhagen polio epidemic Reduction in mortality : 87%  40% ‘considerable deviation from the normal physiological mechanism of respiration’

holleb
Download Presentation

Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Positivepressure ventilation:what is the real cost? Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 446-57 R4 김용일

  2. Positive pressure ventilation • Copenhagen polio epidemic • Reduction in mortality : 87%  40% • ‘considerable deviation from the normal physiological mechanism of respiration’ • by Mushin in 1st edition of Ventilation of the Lungs • Pathophysiological price to pay • Not all complications are obvious or immediate

  3. Oxygenation and ventilation • Monitoringof oxygenation • Focuses on inspired oxygen concentration, arterial blood gases • Arterial values of oxygenation : not ideal parameters • Circulation • Tissue and cell transport • Mitochondrial function between lung and cell • In the critically ill • Relatively low arterial saturation  but, adequate tissue oxygenation • Jeopardous tissue oxygenation  not related directly to lungs • Low saturation & PaO2 : poorly correlate with tissue oxygenation • Difficult to oxygenate -> tolerance develops rapidly -> no markers of tissue hypoxia • ‘few patients with lung injury die of hypoxemia’ • Reconsider about methods of assessing adequacy of oxygenation

  4. Breathing, ventilation, and intrathoracic pressures • In spontaneous breathing • Inspiration • Small negative intrapleural, interstitial, alveolar pressures • Expiration • Intrapleural pr : returns atmospheric, but remains negative • Interstitial & alveolar pr : atmospheric or slightly positive • In positive pressure ventilation • Inspiration • High intrathoracic pr • Expiration • Return towards atmospheric pressure

  5. Ventilation, alveolar ventilation, and recruitment • Surfactant • Modifies the effects of Laplace’s law • Small alveoli are easy to inflate & less tendency to collapse • In positive pressure ventilation • Individual ‘time constants’ of lung regions or alveoli • Airway resistance & alveolar compliance • Determine the effect of pressure in different regions of lung • Positive pressure -> preferentially aerate high compliance areas • Collapsed alveoli may require high sustained pressure

  6. Ventilation, alveolar ventilation, and recruitment - continued • Recruitment • Opening & maintaining open potentially under ventilated areas • To hence alveolar surface area involved in gas exchange • Initial sustained high pressure with subsequent PEEP at various levels • InARDS • Only achieved a mean recruitment of 13% • High levels of PEEP (15 mmHg) are more effective • Both in maintaining alveolar patency & improving oxygenation • Effective in preventing collapse and derecruiment  Sustained increase in intrathoracic pressure

  7. Ventilation, alveolar ventilation, and recruitment - continued • Result of recruitment is unpredictable • Increase gas distribution not to abNL areas • Over-inflating funcional areas •  potentially impairing their function • Recruitment in damaged lungs •  may exacerbate problems

  8. Ventilation pressure and stretch • Lower peak pressure ventilation • Reduce mortality • Shear forces – occur particularly in initiating inflation • May cause injury • Stress & shear forces • Cytokine production increased • White cell sequestration • May predispose to injury & infection • In recruitment • Lowering of the peak pressure • Whereas higher PEEP •  maintains alveolar patency & reduces the shear forces

  9. Ventilation and surfactant • Distortion of surfactant spread • With positive pressure ventilation • Forced air  pressure waveform • Wave formation in surfactant layers • Altering the uniformity of spread • Influences the production & function of surfactant • In lung injury (inflammation) • Reduced type II pneumocytes  reduced surfactant production • Release protein & other materials • Affects ability of surfactant to form surface structures • Membrane permeability changes  Fluid dilution of surfactant • Polymerizing fibrin  Adsorbs surface active compounds • Role in immune defence of surfactant • Influence inflammatory response • Substantial role in mucosal immunity  Vicious cycle to cause further injury

  10. Effects on the cardiovascular system • In normal breathing • In inspiration, assists venous return, pulm capillary flow • With positive pressure ventilation • During inspiration : increased intrathoracic pressure • Decrease venous return, RV output, pulm blood flow • On expiration : intrathoracic pressure returns to zero • PEEP  positive pressure continued  inhibit venous return • Fluid administration : improves venous return & cardiac output • Increase CVP, increase end-capillary pressures in lungs & other organ • Salt & water retention • Classically d/t increased secretion of anti-diuretic hormone • More recently, atrial natriuretic peptide implicated • Correction by IV fluid  further fluid retention

  11. The pulmonary capillary and blood flow • Mean capillary pressure : 7-10 mmHg • Normal breathing • Interstitium & alveoli pressure : lower than capillary perfusion pressure • Pressure within lung : lower than capillary pressure • In COPD with hyperinflation • High intrathoracic pressure on expiration •  increasing capillary resistance • Positive pressure ventilation • Peak inspiratory pressure limited to 30 mmHg • Compress capillary, impede flow • In expiration, PEEP of 15 mmHg • Prevents recovery of normal flow • Inflatable lung region : pressure transmitted • Damagedor infected lung : better perfusion •  impeded capillary flow (ineffective hypoxic vasoconstriction)

  12. The pulmonary capillary and blood flow- continued • High venous pressure – secondary to positive pressure ventilation •  interstitial fluid retention • ‘Capillary stress failure’ – in extreme exercise in racehorses • Pulmonary artery pressure, inflation pressure, venous pressure : high •  damage the integrity of capillary endothelium • Probably also seen in humans • Compensatory mechanisms – ineffective • May aggravate ventilation-perfusion mismatch

  13. Lymphatics • Functions : drainage & defence • Lung lymphatics • Within interstitium, thin, single cell conduits with valves • Inspiration : negative pressure  drain into lymphatics • Pressure in pphlymphatics : max 4 mmHg • Hydrostatic gradient between lymphatics & central veins • During inspiration • Flow easily impeded by • External pressure on lymphatic walls • Outflow resistance

  14. Lymphatics-continued • Positive pressure ventilation • During inspiration • Push fluid from alveolus to interstitium & lymphatics • May compress thin-walled vessels • High CVPs • Significant hydrostatic barrier to flow • During expiration • Allow resumption of flow • In PEEP • Helps remove fluid from alveoli, but reduction in thoracic duct drainage •  fluid retention in interstitium • PEEP in injured lung • Increases lymph production, but impairs lymph flow • Impaired drainage •  fluid accumulation in lung & pleural spaces •  increased susceptibility to lung infection

  15. Organ systemsand positive pressure ventilation • Effects on kidney • Decreased cardiac output • Decrease in GFR • Diversion of intra-renal blood flow • Effects of PEEP on hepato-splanchnic circulation • Venous congestion • Reduced portal blood flow • Increased hepatic blood volume • Reduced hepatosplanchnic lymphatic drainage • Sustained increases in CVP lead to • Venous congestion • Increased end-capillary pressure • Altered fluid dynamics within organs • Affects lymphatic function • Raised intraabdominal pressure • Impairs lymphatic drainage • High thoracic duct pressure • Increases interstitial fluid in liver & kidneys

  16. Conclusions • Ventilation with PEEP • Proven, effective modality in anesthesia & ICU • But, cause physiological derangements • Redistribution of alveolar ventilation • Altered capillary perfusion • Functional changes in surfactant • Transcapillary fluid shifts • Impaired lymphatic drainage • Impeded venous return • Prolonged ventilation • Lung injury • Infection • Multi-organ system dysfunction • Real cost of ventilation or oxygenation •  higher than realized

  17. Conclusions- continued • Are there potential alternatives? • Tank or cuirasses • Generate a negative inspiratory pressure • Development of bedside extracorporeal oxygenation • Using the heart as the pump • Lung assist devices • In their infancy • For future progress • Recognition of physiological derangement • Accepting the physical & physiological constraints • In further evolution of positive pressure ventilation • Technology of positive pressure ventilation • Now more than 50 yr old • Time to consider alternatives

More Related