Muneyuki Ishida( Meisei University) Phys.Lett.B670(2009)395-398. arXiv:0903.1889[ hep -ph]

1. ー Universal Rise of Hadronic Total Cross Sections based on Forward πｐ, Ｋｐ and ｐｐ, ｐｐ Scatterings Muneyuki Ishida(Meisei University) Phys.Lett.B670(2009)395-398. arXiv:0903.1889[hep-ph] In collaboration with KeijiIgi

2. Rise of Total Cross Sections • Total Cross Sections σtot rise in high-energy regions logarithmically. • σtot = B (log s/s0)2+ ZCOMPETE collab. Pomeron contrib. ：dominant in high-energies in Regge theory. B : New term introduced consistently with Froissart unitarity bound. better in low energies than soft-Pomeron fit, σtot =βP(s/s0)0.08 by DonnachieLandshoff • Squared log behaviour was confirmedby using the duality constraint of FESR . KeijiIgi & M.I. ’02. Block & Halzen, ’05.

3. Universal Rise of σtot ? • B (coeff. of (log s/s0)2) : Universal for all hadronic scatterings ? • Phenomenologically B is taken to be universal in the fit to πｐ,Ｋｐ, ｐｐ,ｐｐ,∑ｐ,γｐ, γγforward scatt. COMPETE collab. (adopted in Particle Data Group) • TheoreticallyColour Glass Condensate of QCD suggests the B universality. Ferreiro,Iancu,Itakura,McLerran’02 Not rigourously proved only from QCD.  Test of Universality of B is Necessary. ー

4. Experimental Data Situations σtot ー For pp scatterings We have data in TeV. σtot = Bｐｐ(log s/s0)2 + Z (+ ρ trajectory) in high-energies. parabola of log s Tevatron Ecm=1.8TeV SPS Ecm<0.9TeV ー ｐｐ ISR Ecm<63GeV CDF D0 Bｐｐ= 0.273(19) mb estimated accurately. Depends the data with the highest energy. (CDF D0) 　ｐｐ Fitted energy region

5. πｐ , Ｋｐ Scatterings • No Data in TeV  Estimated Bπｐ, BＫｐ have large uncertainties. No Data No Data Ｋ-ｐ Ｋ+ｐ πーｐ π+ｐ

6. Test of Universality of B ー • Highest energy of Experimetnal data: ｐｐ : Ecm = 0.9TeV SPS; 1.8TeV Tevatron π-ｐ ： Ecm < 26.4GeV Ｋｐ ： Ecm < 24.1GeV No data in TeV B : large errors. Bｐｐ = 0.273(19) mb Bπｐ= 0.411(73) mb Bｐｐ =? Bπｐ=? BＫｐ　? BＫｐ = 0.535(190) mb No definite conclusion • It is impossible to test of Universality of B only by using data in high-energy regions. • We attack this problem using duality constraint from finite-energy sum rule (FESR).

7. Kinematics • ν :Laboratory energy of the incident particle s =Ecm2= 2Mν+M2+m2~ 2Mν M : proton mass of the target. Crossing transf. νー ν m : mass of the incident particle m=mπ , mＫ , M for πｐ, Ｋｐ, ｐｐ,ｐｐ • k = (ν2 –m2)1/2 : Laboratory momentum~ν • Forward scattering amplitudes fap(ν): a = ｐ,π+,Ｋ+ Im fap (ν) = (k / 4 π)σtotap : optical theorem • Crossing relation for forward amplitudes: f π-ｐ(-ν)= fπ+ｐ(ν)* , fＫ-ｐ(-ν) = fＫ+ｐ(ν)* fｐｐ(-ν)= fｐｐ(ν)* ー -

8. Kinematics - ー • Crossing-even amplitudes : F(+)(ーν)=F(+)(ν)* F(+)(ν) = ( fap(ν) + fap(ν) )/2 average of π-ｐ, π+ｐ； Ｋ-ｐ, Ｋ+ｐ；ｐｐ, ｐｐ Im F(+)asymp(ν) = βＰ’/m (ν/m)αＰ’(0) +(ν/m2)[c0+c1log ν/m +c2(log ν/m)2] βＰ’ term : P’trajecctory (f2(1275)): αＰ’(0) ~ 0.5 : Regge Theory c0,c1,c2terms: corresponds to Z + B (log s/s0)2 c2 is directly related with B . (s～2Mν) • Crossing-odd amplitudes : F(-)(ーν)= ーF(-)(ν)* F(-)(ν) = ( fap(ν) ーfap(ν) )/2 Im F(-)asymp(ν) = βV/m (ν/m)αV(0) ρ-trajecctory:αV(0) ~0.5 βＰ’ , βVis Negligible to σtot(= 4π/k Im F(ν) ) in high energies. -

9. Finite-energy sum rule(FESR) ～ ～ • πｐForward Scattering F(ν) = F(+)(ν) ー F(+)asymp(ν) ~ ν -1.5F(N) = ~0 Re F(mπ) = (P/π)∫-∞∞dν’Ｉm F(ν’)/(ν’-m) Nhigh-energy , but finite. = (2P/π)∫0∞dν’Im F(ν’) ν’/ k’2  (2P/π) ∫0NdνIm F(+)(ν)ν/k2 ーRe F(mπ) = (2P/π) ∫0NdνIm F(+)asymp(ν)ν/k2 Igi 1962 • moment Sum RulesIgi Matsuda; Dolen Horn Schmid 1967 ∫0NdνIm F(+)(ν)νn= ∫0NdνIm F(+)asymp(ν)νn n=1,3,… contribution from higher-energy regions is enhanced. ～ ～ ～ ～

10. FESR Duality •  ‘Average’ of Im F(+)(ν)( = k/4π σtot(+)(k) ) in low-energy regions should This shows many peak and dip structures of resonances. coincide with the low-energy extension of the asymptotic formula Im F(+)asymp(ν) . • Taking two N’s : N1 in resonance-energy, N2 in asmptotically high energy. Taking their difference  ∫N1N2 σtot(+)(k)dk/2π2 estimated from low-energy exp. data. = 2/π ∫N1N2 dν Im F(+)asymp(ν)ν/k2 calculable Relation between high-energy parameters βP’,c2,1,0 : A constraint - -

11. Choice of N1 for πｐ Scattering • Many resonances Various values of N1 in π-ｐ& π+ｐ • The smaller N1 is taken, the more accurate c2 (and Bπｐ)obtained. • We take various N1 corresponding to peak and dip positions of resonances. (except for k=N1=0.475GeV) For each N1, FESR is derived. Fitting is performed. The results checked. Δ(1232) N(1520) N(1650,75,80) - Δ(1905,10,20) Δ(1700)

12. Analysis of πｐ Scattering • Simulateous best fit to exp. data of σtot for k = 20~370GeV(Ecm=6.2~26.4GeV) and ρ（= Re f(k) / Im f(k)） fork > 5GeV in π-ｐ,π+ｐforward scatterings. • Parameters : c2,c1,c0,βP’,βV, F(+)(0) (describing ρ) • FESR N2=20GeV fixed. Various N1 tried. Integral of σtot estimated very accurately. Example : N1=0.818GeV 0.872βP’+6.27c0+25.7c1+109c2=0.670 (+ー0.0004 negligible)  βP’ = βP’ (c2,c1,c0):constraint.fitting with 5 params

13. N1 dependence of the result • # of Data points : 162. • best-fitted c2 : very stable. • We choose N1=0.818GeV • as a representative. • Compared with the fit by • 6 param fit with • No use of FESR(No SR)

14. Result of the fit to σtotπｐ No FESR FESR used c2=(164±29)・10-5 c2=(121±13)・10-5 Bπｐ＝0.411±0.073mb Bπｐ＝0.304±0.034mb FESR integral Fitted region Fitted region π-ｐ π+ｐ much improved

15. ー Choice of N1 in Ｋｐ, ｐｐ,ｐｐ ー ｐｐ • Exothermic Ｋ-ｐ　　　 ｐｐ open at thres. ∑-ｐ, Λｐ　　 meson-channels • Exotic Ｋ+ｐ, ｐｐ steep decrease at Ecm~2GeV ?  We take N1 larger than πｐ. N1=5GeV, representat. Ｋ-ｐ ｐｐ Ｋ+ｐ ー

16. Result of the fit to σtotＫｐ No FESR FESR used Fitted region FESR integral Fitted region c2=(266±95)・10-4 c2=(176±49)・10-4 BＫｐ＝0.535±0.190mb BＫｐ＝0.354±0.099mb large uncertainty much improved

17. ー Result of the fit to σtotｐｐ,ｐｐ No FESR FESR used FESR integral Fitted region large Fitted region large c2=(491±34)・10-4 c2=(504±26)・10-4 Bｐｐ＝0.273±0.019mb Bｐｐ＝0.280±0.015mb Improvement is not remarkable in this case.

18. Test of the Universal Rise • σtot= B (log s/s0)2 + Z FESR used No FESR • Bπｐ= Bｐｐ= BＫｐ within 1σ • Universality suggested. Bπｐ≠? Bｐｐ =? BＫｐ No definite conclusion in this case.

19. Concluding Remarks • In order to test the universal rise of σtot(A common value of B in σtot=B (log s/s0)2 + Z ) in all the hadron-hadron scatterings, we have analyzed π±ｐ,Ｋ±ｐ, ｐｐ,ｐｐ independently. • Rich information of low-energy scattering data constrain, through FESR, the high-energy parameters to fit experimental σtot and ρratios. • The values of B are estimated individually for three processes. ー

20. Concluding Remarks Ｋｐ πｐ ｐｐ • We obtain Bπｐ= Bｐｐ= BＫｐ. Universality of B suggested. • Use of FESR is essential to lead this conclusion. • Our result, Bｐｐ= 0.280(15) mb, predicts σｐｐLHC=108.0(1.9) mb . • Our Conclision will be checked by LHC TOTEM.

21. Colour Glass Condensate of QCD • In high-energy scattering, proton is not composed of three valence quarks, but a large number of gluons with small momentum fraction x. • The gluon density of the target proton drastically increases with small x ( = large s)  gluon condensation. BFKL, BK eq. derived from pQCD.  strong absorption of incident beam : black disc Its radius R increases like ~log s : depends upon soft physics.  σtot ~ 2 πR2 ~ B (log s)2 • CGC: B=0.446mb(αs=0.1)  B(LO) = π/2 (ω αs/mπ)2=2.09mb • Bpp(exp) = 0.280±0.015mb ~ 0.3 mb ( << B(Martin) = π/mπ2=62mb ) rNLO BFKL eq Itakura, lectures in Dec.2008 -

22. g* 1/Q transverse 1/xP+ longitudinal Lecture by Itakura 高エネルギー散乱での陽子の振る舞い 深非弾性散乱でみた陽子の内部構造　　　パートン：クォークとグルオンの総称 陽子 各パートンの分布関数 Q2 = qT2 : transverse resolution x =p+/P+ : longitudinal mom. fraction パートンの持つ運動量比ｘ ・ 陽子は単純な３つのヴァレンスクォークの集まりでは「ない」 ・ 陽子は小さな運動量比（ x < 10 -2）を持つ膨大な数のグルオンからなる ・ そのグルオンは高エネルギー散乱（ x ~ Q2/(Q2+W2) 0）で見えてくる 同様のことは、全てのハドロンや原子核にあてはまる

23. Result of the fit to ρ ratios π-ｐπ+ｐ　　　　　　Ｋ-ｐ　Ｋ+ｐ　　　　ｐｐ　ｐｐ ー