180 likes | 301 Views
Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010. Action Research in Teaching and Learning. Introductions Action Research in a Nutshell Step by step process to … prepare your proposal Wrap up and Evaluations. The Plan .
E N D
Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010 Action Research in Teaching and Learning
Introductions Action Research in a Nutshell Step by step process to … prepare your proposal Wrap up and Evaluations The Plan
Introductions1. Your name, what you teach, & for how long 2. One thing you enjoy about teaching at NWIC 3. One challenge in teaching students at NWIC
Action Research (AR) • Goal: to improve (change) how we address issues or problems via vigorous inquiry and reflection (research) (Lewin, 1946) • Research Questions: • Personal • Organizational • Societal (Reason & Bradbury, 2001)
Action research IN TEACHING & LEARNING • GOAL: To improve how we teach (pedagogy) based on rigorous inquiry & reflection (research) • WHY: To improve student learning • TO DO SO: We must understand our students • What’s in a name? • SOTL: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning • Instructional Communication • Educational Assessment • Scholarship of Assessment
1. Identify an issue/problem/difficulty in the classroom (RQ). 2. Come up with a research-based strategy for addressing it. 3. Do it. 4. Assess it. 5. Complete the feedback loop. 6. Write it up! How?
Examples: • Public speaking: • anxiety/disclosure/gender bias • online • speech content • Teacher training: • international TAs • isolation • course consistency/integrity • General: • immediacy in online instruction • unprepared students/don’t read for class • student commitment (relevance/value) • student engagement Step 1. identify an issue/problem/difficulty in the classroom
Generation NeXt • Consumer Orientation • Entertainment Orientation • Techno-literate • Instant Gratification • Self-Interested • Cynical • Stressed • Intellectually disengaged • Civility Issues • Self-Efficacy Issues • Negotiation College Students Today
Teaching-Centered • Lecture, discussion (student-teacher, student-student, experiential • Curriculum-Centered • Course materials, supplements, topics, assignments • Problem-based learning • Environment-Centered • Online, face to face, in-class, out of class Step 2: What strategy will you try to solve it?
Public speaking: • Anxiety=Speech of Personal Significance • Online=online course • Speech content=problem-based learning • Teacher training: • International TAs=BAT training • Isolation=peer mentoring • Course consistency/integrity=weekly meetings, intercoder training, test creation round robins • General: • Immediacy in online instruction=email and emoticon training • Unprepared students/don’t read for class=quizzes, questions • Student commitment (relevance/value)=service learning • Student engagement=learning cycle lessons Examples
Modify . . . • Syllabus • Lecture notes to lesson plans • Assignments • Assessment and evaluation tools Step 3: Do it.
≠ Evaluation • Curriculum-Embedded • Performance-based • Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral • Rubrics • Methods • Direct or indirect • Qualitative or quantitative Step 4: Assessment
Public speaking: • Anxiety=Speech of Personal Sig-content analysis of speeches • Online=online course=content analysis of speeches • Speech content=problem-based learning=content analysis of speeches • Teacher training: • International TAs=BAT training=student and teacher questionnaires • Isolation=peer mentoring=reflective papers and portfolios • Course consistency/integrity=weekly meetings, intercoder training, test creation round robins=portfolios • General: • Immediacy in online instruction=email and emoticon training=student surveys • Unprepared students/don’t read for class=quizzes, questions=student surveys • Student commitment (relevance/value)=service learning=interviews, focus groups, content analysis of speeches, affective learning scale, content relevance scale • Student engagement=learning cycle lessons=test scores, content analysis of speeches, TCEs examples
Reflect on what worked, etc. and modify syllabus and pedagogy Step 5: Complete the feedback loop
Build an argument for what you did (research based) • Introduce RQ or H • Describe the methods you used to assess its utility • Clarify results • Offer a discussion that presents conclusions, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research Step 6: Write it up!
Argument: Speech anxiety is lower when people know each other but men don’t like to disclose as much as women • RQ: Is there an inherent gender bias in requiring a self disclosure speech? • Methods: content analysis comparison of speeches and grades • Results: Topics and subpoints differed, grades did not • Discussion: It’s ok as long as students are free to choose the topic and examples they actually disclose Example: anxiety and self disclosure
Put the final touches on your proposals! • Onward and upward! • Questions/ideas/thoughts? • Deanna.Sellnow@uky.edu Voila!