1 / 14

Section 1 Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs

Section 1 Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs. Peer Review Training – National Science Foundation February 7, 2012. http://www.ignet.gov/pande/audit1.html#guide 2009 Guide (. pdf format) 2009 Guide (.doc format). What I’ll Talk About Today.

hila
Download Presentation

Section 1 Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Section 1Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs Peer Review Training – National Science Foundation February 7, 2012 Kieu Rubb, Treasury OIG, rubbk@oig.treas.gov, 202-927-5904

  2. http://www.ignet.gov/pande/audit1.html#guide2009 Guide (.pdf format) 2009 Guide (.doc format)

  3. What I’ll Talk About Today • Purpose of Section 1 • System of Quality Control • Peer Review Responsibilities • Questions

  4. Purpose • Guidance so OIG has reasonable assurance of complying with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements: • GAAS • SAS/SSAE • OMB/GAO guidance • OIG-related statutes • Other laws and regulations

  5. What’s in a QA System? • Leadership • High-quality work • Policies, procedures, and Monitoring

  6. QA System Structure • Depends on • OIG’s size • Number of offices • Geographic dispersion • Personnel knowledge and experience • Nature and complexity of work • Cost-benefit considerations

  7. Why Have a QA System • Ensure objective, timely, and comprehensive appraisal of operations • Professional care with quality assurance reviews

  8. Programs Characteristics • Leadership - Quality in audits and organization • Independence, legal, and ethical requirements • Initiation, acceptance, and continuation of engagements • HR/staffing - People have adequate skills, education, experience, and knowledge • Engagements performance, documentation, and reporting • Quality monitoring

  9. Quality Monitoring • Adherence to professional standards and legal requirements • Design of system of internal control • Staff compliance with quality control policies and procedures

  10. Monitoring Program • Analyze and report the results of monitoring • adequate planning • document findings • develop recommendations • solicit comments from reviewed • Identify any systemic issues for improvements • Provide corrective actions

  11. External Peer Review - Team Lead Responsibilities • Sufficient expertise and authority • Document proper supervision • Report to appropriate individual/level

  12. External Peer Review – Team Responsibilities • Conduct risk assessment • Give no advance notice • Conduct sufficient testing • Ensure positive and constructive process • Obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence • Determine compliance with standards, regulations, and policies and procedures • Prepare written results • Make recommendations and obtain written comments

  13. External Peer Review – Reviewed OIG Responsibilities • Provide documentation • Ensure positive and constructive process • Provide written comments • Implement appropriate corrective actions

  14. Questions For questions or comments on the revised guide, contact APRG@oig.treas.gov.

More Related