1 / 20

Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA

Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors in two endangered species, Atlantic salmon and shortnose sturgeon. Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA.

hien
Download Presentation

Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors in two endangered species, Atlantic salmon and shortnose sturgeon Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA

  2. Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors in two endangered species, Atlantic salmon and shortnose sturgeon Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA Funding

  3. Salmon and sturgeon conservation Anadromous Atlantic salmon and shortnose sturgeon are listed as endangered under the ESA Conservation efforts traditionally do not consider potential impacts of EDCs Habitat use and life strategies suggest these species may be particularly sensitive to degraded water quality

  4. EPA WET testing and surrogate species WET: Whole Effluent Testing uses a single life-stage 4-day exposure, mortality is primary target Long-term, sublethal impacts are not routinely monitored Surrogate speciesDaphnia, brook trout, fathead minnow, silversides Sturgeon and salmon are very sensitive to common endocrine disruptors and effluent Dwyer et al. 2005, Arch. Environ. Toxicology and Contamination

  5. Life-stage and life-history will influence contaminant response Larvae Juveniles Embryo Gonad differentiation or other factor Numerous life-stage sensitivity examples At what life stage will this chemical do the most damage?

  6. Objectives Three year study: • Assess which life-stage may be most responsive to common feminizing EDCs • Assess vitellogenin (Vtg) as an appropriate biomarker for measuring contaminant sensitivity 3. Carry out chronic exposures (21-day) and assess impacts to fitness (growth, gonad histology, development, salinity tolerance)

  7. Methodology 4-day exposures on early life-stages 1. Embryos 2. Yolk-sac larvae 3. Feeding fry 4. Juveniles/smolts Compounds used 1. α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) 2. 17 β-estradiol (E2) 3. 4-nonylphenol (NP) 15oC target temperature for all life-stages (12oC for salmon embryos)

  8. Methodology • Concentrations used represent: • Positive control dose • Concentration common to wastewater effluent • Low dose similar to that found in an urbanized river/estuary • Solvent control (<0.001%) • Flow through system, 2 to 7 volumes d-1 Vtg gene expression (qPCR) and development of a sensitive EIA for Vtg protein concentration (from Peck et al. 2011) Whole body mRNA for early life-stages, liver in juveniles Mortality data

  9. Vitellogenin as an indicator of life-stage sensitivity Common biomarker of estrogenic contaminant exposure Indicative of potential long-term reproductive impacts Could be used in the field in early life-stage fish

  10. Atlantic salmon vitellogenin mRNA control α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) embryos 17 β-estradiol (E2) Nonylphenol (NP) Relative transcription (normalized to EF-1α) EE2 and E2 show significant treatment response, but this trend is not dose dependent (2-way ANOVA). NP is not significantly different from control.

  11. Atlantic salmon vitellogenin mRNA control α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) Yolk-sac larvae embryos 17 β-estradiol (E2) * * Nonylphenol (NP) * * * Relative transcription (normalized to EF-1α) * * Significant treatment effects, but dose-dependent response is less clear.

  12. Atlantic salmon vitellogenin mRNA control α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) Feeding fry 17 β-estradiol (E2) * Nonylphenol (NP) * Relative transcription (normalized to EF-1α) * * * Dose (nM) All compounds show significant treatment effect, but suggestive dose-dependent response is non-significant. Vtg response is 200 to 500 times Vtg control transcription.

  13. Atlantic salmon vitellogenin mRNA control α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) Smolts * 17 β-estradiol (E2) * Nonylphenol (NP) * * Relative transcription (normalized to EF-1α) 50 Dose (nM) EE2 and E2 elicit significant, dose-dependent response. Vtg mRNA is highest in this life-stage at 500-1500 times control transcription.

  14. Summary E2 and EE2 elicit robust response in Vtg mRNA. Feeding fry show highest Vtg upregulation in response to NP. Overall expression is highest in salmon smolts (liver vs. whole animal differences?).

  15. Smolt plasma vitellogenin control α-ethinylestradiol * 17 β-estradiol * Nonylphenol Plasma Vtg (μg/ml) * * 400 * * * * * Dose (nM) Significant overall treatment effect and dose-dependent response Response to NP is muted compared to estrogens EIA shows a clearer response than qPCR data

  16. Sturgeon Vtg mRNA Preliminary data Feeding fry Vtg response less robust than in salmon Full analysis will demonstrate if Vtg is an appropriate biomarker in early life-stage sturgeon Relative Vtg transcription Dose (nM)

  17. Conclusions E2 and EE2 elicited nearly identical responses, and exposure to these compounds elicited strong Vtg response. Plasma Vtg may be the most appropriate biomarker for exogenous estrogen exposure. Vtg protein demonstrated a clear pattern of dose-dependent response, but not applicable to early life stages. Sensitivity vs. responsiveness of each life stage? Development of appropriate biomarker for sturgeon.

  18. Future directions What are the implications of long-term exposure? Which species is most sensitive? Comparison to surrogate species

  19. Funding and acknowledgements McCormick lab Amy Regish Arne Christensen Michael O’Dea Joe Chadwick Barbara Arter Bill Kier-Kier Associates

More Related