Voluntary Auditing Standards in the Public Interest. William Kinney Auditing Section Doctoral Consortium Savannah, Georgia. January 12, 2012. Auditing Research Components. Accounting. null?. Auditing. S-K. KPS. L-K. K-S. Laws, regs , governance Contracts/ incentives
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Voluntary Auditing Standards in the Public Interest William Kinney Auditing Section Doctoral Consortium Savannah, Georgia January 12, 2012
Auditing Research Components Accounting null? Auditing S-K KPS L-K K-S • Laws, regs, governance • Contracts/ incentives • Professional standards • Firm organization, mores • External enforcement • Culture, markets, traditions Professional Structure
Financial reporting laws, regulations, and standards across borders EU law/ EC directives/ Sec. reg.?? FR law/ Sec. reg.? • FR national • FRF&AudStds • Borse rules • FR private lit. UK culture/ contracts/ governance FR culture/ contracts/ governance D, Inc. E, Inc. F Corp. G, Inc. H, Inc. I Corp. Who will interpret and enforce these FRFs and AudStds? Will they differ? US law/ Sec. reg. UK law/ Sec. reg.? • UK national • FRF&AudStds • LSE rules • UK private lit. • US national • FRF&AudStds • NYSE rules • US private lit. Global Financial Reporting Framework and Auditing Standards US culture/ contracts/ governance A, Inc. B, Inc. C Corp.
U.S. Financial Reporting Regulators post-2002 FASB PCAOB Internal Control (COSO) Q.C. Stds. Inspect/ Enforce Aud. Stds. Ind. Stds. GAAP SEC Measurement criteria Application of criteria
E.U. Financial Reporting Regulators (with member differences*) EU (none) National? x x IASB IAASB Indep. Stds. IFRS Turnbull, Venoit,… Inspect/ enforce ISAs QCS ISAEs Measurement criteria Application of criteria * Red Italics means national regulations only (i.e., jurisdictional version)
How best to set Global Standards: • National government mandate (with convergence across nations)? • Political group representation in global org.? • Independent experts, due process, in sunshine, independent oversight, and voluntary adoption by nations? • Any of the above “plus” national government approved additions? • Something else?
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) • Mission: to serve the public interest, IFAC will continue to strengthen the worldwide accountancy profession and contribute to the development of strong international economies by establishing and promoting adherence to high-quality professional standards, furthering the international convergenceof such standardsand speaking out on public interest issues where the profession’s expertise is most relevant. • Standards: IAASB (auditing), IESBA (ethics), IAESB (education), IPSASB (public sector accounting)
Enforcement: local, private groups, international cooperation? Web of national securities regulators (IOSCO)? National government-approved Inspectors (PCAOB)? Stock exchange rules (NYSE, Borse, LSE) ? Voluntary web of public interest orgs (IASB, IAASB, PIOB, IFIAR, World Bank, IMF) ? Government agency cooperation (IOSCO, SEC, AMF, FSA, INTOSAI) ? G-20 self-monitoring, international treaties, agreement to cede decision authority? Global model private litigation statue?
Current issues/topics? • Global politics of Auditing regulator/standards setter competition (EC, PCAOB, IAASB)? • Auditing accounting estimates (e.g., Fair values): • ISA 540, CIFiR recommendation, PCOAB response • Group audits: • ISA 600 • Global cooperative inspections by PCAOB, FRC, etc. • Group-level ICFR (huge threat, huge potential, almost zero theory, field studies, archival studies) • PCAOB inspections practices and expectations: • Large firms/ small firms, no recognition of firm QC • global cooperation/access and “Lehman Brothers?”
Conclusion There are problems with and questions about standardized global financial reporting No single “silver bullet” solution, but Apparent demand for market-driven mechanisms (broadly defined) expertise of independent public interest groups appropriate oversight at all levels with appropriate national government enforcement What mechanism design do you like best . . . and why?
Top Ten differences in design and operation of IAASB and PCOAB Global by design Market-driven services (e.g., no ICFR audits) Public interest objective (investors, directors, workers, community) Comprehensive (all assurance services, all entities, all auditors) Voluntary adoption (quality of standards is raison d'être) Some global influence via inspections of foreign filers Statute-driven (domestic crisis politics as force) Investor protection objective Limited to financial and ICFR audits*of U.S. public companies Use mandated by U.S. law, no cost effectiveness test IAASB PCAOB
Top Ten differences in design of IAASB and PCOAB (cont’d) Developed in sunshine Diversity (9 practice members, 9 not), 18 Tech Advisors, 8 IFAC staff, Task Forces, other experts, CAG, SME, SMP, NSS Audit expertise on Board Independent in selection, oversight, oath (only Ch. Is paid) Independent oversight by PIOB (appointed by Basel Group, World Bank, IOSCO, Int. Assoc. of Insurance Supervisors, observed by Financial Stability Forum and Int. Fed. of Independent Audit Regulators) Unknown - but not sunshine Three non-CPAs, two CPAs (no practice members) 14standards staff, SAG? No expertise necessary Staff is hired/paid by Board Oversight by SEC personnel (but to date, no public reports) IAASB PCAOB