1 / 153

* of 69

Design for Cast and Molded Parts. Team: Terese Bertcher Larry Brod Pam Lee Mike Wehr. * of 69. Lecture updates .

helki
Download Presentation

* of 69

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design for Cast and Molded Parts Team: Terese Bertcher Larry Brod Pam Lee Mike Wehr * of 69

  2. Lecture updates Revisions & Edits provided by: Seamus Clark, Scott Leonardi, Gary Meyers, Joe Torres, Beatriz Dhruna, John Fraser, Craig Jozsa, Dwayne Mattison, Darcy McClure, Kevin O’Callaghan, Norm Opolsky, Henry Gasahl, Rolf Glaser * of 69

  3. Lecture Topics • Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Injection Molding Process • Gating Considerations • Case Study – Corvette Brake Pedal • Case Study – M1 Abrams Tank * of 69

  4. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  5. Visualize the Casting • It is difficult to follow section changes and shapes from blueprint. • Create a model to scale or full size to help designer to: • See how cores must be designed, placed or omitted • Determine how to mold the casting • Detect casting weaknesses (shrinks / cracks) • Determine where to place gates and risers • Answer questions affecting soundness, cost and delivery * of 69

  6. Die Casting vs. Sand Casting Pros and Cons of using Die-Casting Pros • Thinner walls • Closer Dimensional Limits • Reduced labor in setup • Smoother surfaces with a potential for less stress risers • Lower finishing costs • Good solution for high volume applications that have stable designs and design life. Cons • High initial die investment • Limited # of casts (<100,000 typically) • Limit to size of cast part (approx. 70 lbs for aluminum) • High temperature casts can reduce life of dies • Cannot be used on hollow parts such as exhaust manifolds • Minor casting updates difficult and costly. • Die casting prevents the usage of stronger alloys tolerated by sand-casting The designer must decide what casting best suits their specific application as one type is NOT necessarily better than the other!

  7. Simplification of Die Configuration Die Opening Direction Cavity Part Core Die Opening Direction * of 69

  8. Simplification of Die Configuration Die Opening Direction Add a chamfer to the part Cavity Core Die Opening Direction * of 69

  9. Simplification of Die Configuration Ejector pin pushes the part out of the core as the lifter slides away from the snap undercut. Support plate is stationary. It pushes lifter to the left as ejector plate moves upward. Lifter moves away from undercut portion of snap * of 69

  10. Simplification of Die Configuration * of 69

  11. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  12. Design for Soundness • Most metals, alloys, and plastics shrink when they solidify • Design components so that all parts increase in dimension progressively to areas where feeder heads (risers) can be placed to offset shrinkage • Disguise areas of shrinkage when unavoidable • The mold and pattern should be made larger than the casting by the amount of shrinkage • Shrinkage of casting varies not only with material but also with shape, thickness, casting temperature, mold temperature and mold strength • Thicker areas will cool slower than thinner areas. Areas of transition between thick and thin (ribs, walls, embosses, etc) will be prone to sink marks. Different tool shops and different materials will require a certain rib-to-wall thickness ratio. * of 69

  13. Design for Soundness • The table below shows an average amount of shrinkage for important cast metals * *

  14. Design Rules: Disguising Sink Marks * of 69

  15. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  16. Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • When two or more sections conjoin, mechanical weakness is induced at the junction interrupting free cooling (most common defect in casting design). • Replace sharp angles with radii and minimize heat and stress concentration • In cored parts avoid designs without cooling surfaces • A rounded junction offers a more uniform distribution of strength * of 69

  17. Design Rules:Corners & Radii Incorrect Corner Design Good Corner Design • Generous radius • Uniform wall thickness • Smooth flow transition • Very sharp radii • High stress concentration • Sharp flow transition Incorrect Corner Design Incorrect Corner Design • Outside corner and inside radius • Non-uniform wall thickness • Non-uniform flow transition • Shrinkage stress / voids / sinks • Inside / outside radius mismatch • Non-uniform wall thickness • Non-uniform flow transition Sink * of 69

  18. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  19. Minimize the Number of Sections • A well designed casting brings the minimum number of sections together at one point. • Staggering sections (where possible) • Minimizes hot spot effects • Eliminates weakness • Reduces distortion • Where staggering sections is not possible use a cored hole through the center of the junction. • Helps to speed solidification • Helps to avoid hot spots * of 69

  20. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  21. Employ Uniform Sections • Thicker walls will solidify more slowly. • This means they will feed solidifying thinner walls. • Results in shrinkage voids in the thicker walls • Goal is to design uniform sections that solidify evenly. • If this is not possible, all heavy sections should be accessible to feeding from risers. * of 69

  22. Design Rules: Wall Uniformity Improved Part Design • Thinner wall sections • More uniform wall thickness • Inside and outside radii (when possible) Original Part Design • Very thick wall sections • Non-uniform wall thickness • Sharp inside and outside radii * of 69

  23. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  24. Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Inner sections of castings cool much slower than outer sections. • Causes variations in strength properties • A good rule of thumb is to reduce inner sections to 90% of outer wall thickness. • Avoid rapid section changes • Results in porosity problems similar to what is seen with sharp angles. * of 69

  25. Design Rules: Wall Uniformity Part gated from “thin to thick” hinders packing of thicker sections and can create flow problems. Internal runner to assist / improve the ability to pack the thick section when gating from “thin to thick” is necessary. Gating from “thick to thin” when possible to improve flow and allow thicker sections to be packed. * of 69

  26. Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Whenever complex cores must be used, design for uniformity of section to avoid local heavy masses of metal. • The inside diameter of cylinders and bushings should exceed the wall thickness of castings. • When the I.D. is less than the wall it is better to cast the section as a solid. • Holes can be produced by cheaper and safer methods than with extremely thin cores * of 69

  27. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  28. Fillet All Sharp Angles • Fillets (rounded corners) have three functional purposes: • To reduce the stress concentration in a casting in service • To eliminate cracks, tears and draws at re-entry angles • To make corners more moldable by eliminating hot spots • Improves flow of material • The number of different size fillet radii used in a pattern should be the minimized

  29. Fillet All Sharp Angles • Large fillets may be used with radii equaling or exceeding the casting section. • Commonly used to fulfill engineering stress requirements • Reduces stress concentration • Note: Fillets that are too large are undesirable – the radius of the fillet should not exceed half the thickness of the section joined. * of 69

  30. Fillet All Sharp Angles • Tips to avoid a section size that is too large at an “L”, “V” or “Y” junction. • For an “L” junction : • Round an outside corner to match the fillet on the inside wall. (If this is not possible the designer must make a decision as to which is more important: Engineering design or possible casting defect) • For a “V” or “Y” junction: • Always design so that a generous radius eliminates localization of heat. * of 69

  31. Design Rules: Fillets & Corners * of 69

  32. Design Rules: Fillets & Corners * of 69

  33. Design Rules: Fillets & Corners * of 69

  34. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  35. Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • The difference in relative thickness of adjoining sections should not exceed a ratio of 2:1. • With a ratio less than 2:1 the change in thickness may take on the form of a fillet. • Where this is not possible consider a design with detachable parts. * of 69

  36. Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • With a ratio greater than 2:1 the recommended shift for the change in thickness should take on the form of a wedge. • Note: wedge-shaped changes in wall thickness should not taper more than 1 in 4. • Where a combination of light and heavy sections is unavoidable, use fillets and tapered sections to temper the shifts. * of 69

  37. Design Rules: Section Changes Tapered Transition Better Wall Thickness Transitions Gradual Transition Stepped Transition Poor Design Best Core out thicker areas where possible * of 69

  38. Basic Casting Design Guidelines • Visualize the Casting • Design for Soundness • Avoid Sharp Angles & Corners • Minimize the Number of Sections • Employ Uniform Sections • Correctly Proportion Inner Walls • Fillet All Sharp Angles • Avoid Abrupt Section Changes • Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid Using Bosses, Lugs & Pads * of 69

  39. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Ribs are only preferable when the casting wall cannot be made strong or stiff enough on its own. • Ribs have two functions: • They increase stiffness • They help to reduce weight • Common mistakes that make ribs ineffective: • Too shallow • Too widely spaced * of 69

  40. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • The thickness of the ribs should be approximately 80% of the adjoining thickness and should be rounded at the edge. • The design preference is for ribs to be deeper than they are thick. • Ribs should solidify before the casting section they adjoin. • The space between ribs should be designed such that localized accumulation of metal is prevented. • Preferably the ribs connect the attachment to the loading point. * of 69

  41. Design Rules:Rib Dimensions General Guidelines for Rib Dimensions* • Component wall thickness: h • Draft per side(0): 0.5º ⇔ 1.5º • Rib height (L): ≤ 5h (typically 2.5⇔3.0h) • Rib spacing (on center): ≥ 2h ⇔ 3h • Base radius (R): ≥ 0.25h ⇔ 0.40h • Rib thickness (t): 0.4 ⇔ 0.8h *Exact rib dimensions are material specific * of 69

  42. Design Rules:Rib Wall Thickness Shrinkage Voids Excessive Radius Rib Sink Mark Radius (fillet) Part Wall Excessive Rib Wall Thickness Correct Proportions * of 69

  43. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Generally, ribs in compression offer a greater safety factor than ribs in tension. • Exception: Castings with thin ribs in compression may require design changes to provide necessary stiffening and avoid buckling. • Thin ribs should be avoided when joined to a heavy section or they may lead to high stresses and cracking * of 69

  44. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Avoid cross ribs & ribbing on both sides of a casting • Cross ribbing creates hot spots and makes feeding difficult • Alternative is to design cross-coupled ribs in a staggered “T” form. • Avoid complex ribbing • Complicates molding, hinders uniform solidification and creates hot spots * of 69

  45. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Ribs meeting at acute angles may cause molding difficulties, increase costs and aggravate the risk of casting defects • “Honeycombing” often will provide increased strength and stiffness without creating hot spots * of 69

  46. Design Rules: Rib Manufacturability * of 69

  47. Design Rules: Rib Design * of 69

  48. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • Brackets carrying offset loads introduce bending moments, localized and in the body of the casting. • Tips to avoid this problem: • Taper “L” shaped brackets and make the length of contact with the main casting as ample as possible. • Brackets may frequently be cast separately and then attached, simplifying the molding. * of 69

  49. Maximize Design of Ribs & Brackets • A ribbed bracket will offer a stiffness advantage, but avoid heat concentration by providing cored openings in webs and ribs. • The openings should be as large as possible • The openings should be consistent with strength and stiffness • Avoid rectangular-shaped cored holes in ribs or webs. • Use oval-shaped holes with the longest dimension in the direction of the stresses * of 69

  50. Recommended Configurations Sharp corners, small radii H ≤ T H > T core out underside Ribs inside, good distribution of metals for all purposes. May complicate die construction May complicate die construction Good distribution of stresses External ribs may cause poor distribution of stresses Generous draft and fillets, angular transitions Sharp corners, small radii, little draft * of 69

More Related