0 likes | 1 Views
Weekly or Bi-weekly Drops: JokerStash would frequently release new batches of stolen card data on a regular schedule, often once a week or every two weeks. The drops usually occurred at a specific time to coincide with demand cycles.<br>
E N D
Weekly Updates: Joker Stash Drop Insights While the JokerStash https://jokerstashh.com marketplace was active, it was known for regularly posting "drops" of stolen data, which referred to batches of compromised credit card information, personal data, and "Fullz" (complete identity packages). These drops often followed certain patterns and trends based on the frequency, size, and type of data released. Here's a breakdown of what weekly updates and drops typically looked like: 1. Drop Timing and Frequency: Weekly or Bi-weekly Drops: JokerStash would frequently release new batches of stolen card data on a regular schedule, often once a week or every two weeks. The drops usually occurred at a specific time to coincide with demand cycles. Peak Traffic on Mondays: Data releases were often timed for Mondays or the beginning of the week to capitalize on early-week shopping and online activity. 2. Types of Data in Each Drop: Credit Card Dumps: The bulk of data drops consisted of stolen credit card information, often in the form of "dumps" (magnetic stripe data) or CVVs (Card Verification Values). These were used to clone cards or for online transactions. Fullz: A more comprehensive package of data that included not only credit card information but also personal identifying details like Social Security numbers, addresses, email addresses, dates of birth, and
sometimes more. These Fullz were usually highly sought after by buyers engaged in identity theft. Fresh Dumps from High-Value Target Regions: High-demand regions, particularly the United States, would see batches of credit cards from well-known retailers, banks, and even smaller financial institutions that were easier to exploit due to weaker security measures. Combo Lists: JokerStash would often feature combo lists, which are lists of usernames and passwords from various services like Netflix, Amazon, or gaming platforms. These lists were in high demand from individuals looking to exploit compromised accounts. 3. Drop Sizes: Large Drops: Some drops included tens of thousands of compromised credit cards or more, making them highly valuable for resellers or fraudsters. These drops often targeted popular regions like the U.S. or Western Europe, where credit card usage was more frequent. Smaller, Niche Drops: There were also more niche drops, such as compromised information from specific banks, small e-commerce platforms, or high-net-worth individuals. These types of data were generally priced higher due to their specificity. 4. Pricing Trends: Price Adjustments Based on Region: Stolen credit card data from different regions was priced differently, with U.S. and Canadian data usually being more expensive due to their higher value in fraud schemes.
Premium Pricing for Fresh Data: Freshly stolen data, especially from high-value targets, was often priced at a premium. Fraudsters and resellers valued data that had not yet been widely circulated or flagged by security measures. Discounts on Larger Purchases: There were often bulk discounts for large purchases. Buyers who purchased large quantities of compromised cards or "Fullz" could get a lower per-card price.