html5-img
1 / 9

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Protection Jan 18 th , 2012

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Protection Jan 18 th , 2012. CHF Sector Priorities:. A. Provision of protection services to conflict affected population.

hedwig-phillips
Download Presentation

Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: Protection Jan 18 th , 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sudan CHF 2012 1st Round Sector Defense Sector: Protection Jan 18th , 2012

  2. CHF Sector Priorities: A.Provision of protection services to conflict affected population. B.Intervention and support to empower vulnerable groups in creation of protective environment aiming at reintegration. C.Capacity building of national actors to address humanitarian needs in provision of protection services.

  3. CHF Geographical priorities: • A.Conflict affected locations in Darfur and Three Protocol Areas (Abyei, South Kordofan and Blue Nile), including areas of primary and secondary displacement. • Locations with large Southern populations and with stranded returnees, in particular Khartoum departure points and Kosti in White Nile. • C.Darfur and Three Protocol Areas (Abyei, South Kordofan and Blue Nile) not affected by the conflict. • D. IDP camps and settlements in Eastern States.

  4. Sector strategy for addressing the priorities A. Provision of coordinated and comprehensive response to protection challenges. Enhance mechanisms for proper monitoring, reporting and evaluation. B. Enhance data collection. Increase participation and enhance capacity of local partners. C. Focus on advocacy for access and protection of civilian population.

  5. What evidence supports your identified priority needs? Include targeted beneficiary population • Needs assessments, joint surveys with partners, weekly protection monitoring reports, child protection and GBV reports. • B. Targeted population includes: conflict affected civilians, IDPs, women, children, vulnerable and extremely vulnerable persons total of 2,345,000. • C. Main geographical locations of sector priorities implementation are mapped below:

  6. Why is CHF funding critical right now to meet these sector priorities?(i.e. what would happen without funding for 6 months?) A. Life saving interventions will lack rapid response. B. With lack of protective services violations of rights will not be timely reported and responded to. C. Communities’ emergency preparedness will be lessened. D. UNCT and partners will lack crucial and reliable information. E. Assistance to vulnerable categories of beneficiaries will be delayed and weakened.

  7. How were value for money and low indirect costs ensured? A. Gaps analysis, non-duplication of activities. B. Quality and appropriateness of certain services (minimum standards). C. Coherence of budget with project proposal. D. Costs standardized for all partners. E. Move from direct implementation into partnerships.

  8. Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Recommended Sector Envelope: USD 5,265,000 Total requested amount / Total TRG-recommended amount: USD 14,481,718/USD 5,265,000 Total projects: 29/15 Recommended UN/NGO/NNGO percentage: 44.7% / 43.3% / 12% Total Recommended Sector Envelope versus historical trend or basis for envelope: Envelope 2012:USD 5,259,169 Trend 2006-2011: USD 5,314,382 2011 allocation: USD7,017,000 Approach to determining project allocation amounts (NOT scoring methodology): Priority/Capacity/Score by points/Score by percentage

More Related