1 / 7

Elaboration Paradigms Multivariate Tables

Elaboration Paradigms Multivariate Tables. Interpreting what happens to the 2-Way table when introduce test variable. Elaboration. Trying to specify what happens to the relationship between IV and DV when introduce T. Possible outcomes: No change in partial tables Change in partial tables.

heaton
Download Presentation

Elaboration Paradigms Multivariate Tables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elaboration ParadigmsMultivariate Tables Interpreting what happens to the 2-Way table when introduce test variable

  2. Elaboration • Trying to specify what happens to the relationship between IV and DV when introduce T. • Possible outcomes: • No change in partial tables • Change in partial tables.

  3. Factors to Consider in an Elaboration • Is the test variable an antecedent or an intervening variable? • Antecedent – precedes IV • Intervening – occurs in between Iv and DV • What happens to the original relationship between IV and DV when T is introduced? • Stay the same replication • Change  need to consider a variety of possible types of elaboration: spuriousness, specification, distorter or suppressor

  4. Spuriousness • If relationship between IV and DV is weakened when T present then have spuriousness. (Qxy0 and Qtxy=0 pr negligible) • If T is an antecedent then have explanation. T explains relationship between IV and DV. • If T is an intervening then have interpretation. • Relationship between variables that produce spuriousness • QTX and QTY must be nonneglible • If Qxy =+, then QTX and QTY must have same signs • If Qxy =-, then QTX and QTY must have opposite signs

  5. Specification • The introduction of T results in different relationships between IV and DV for conditions of T. • Can say that T specifies the relationship between IV and DV or that relationship between IV and DV depends on the level of T. Look for which attribute of T strengthens original relationship. • Before conclude that you have specification the difference for the partial Q’s > 10 points. See if the chi square for the partial is significant.

  6. Suppression • Suppressor is present • The relationship between IV and DV is small or negligible. The introduction of the test variable results in swelling the relationship between IV and DV • When T raises a positive relationship between Qxy, then T must have opposite sign correlations with X and Y. • When T raises a negative relationship between Qxy, then T must have same sign correlations with X and Y.

  7. Distortion • Distortion is present • The relationship between IV and DV is reversed when T is introduced. • When T reverses the sign of the relationship between Qxy, then T must have opposite sign correlations with X and Y. • When T results in reversing a negative relationship between Qxy, then T must have opposite sign correlations with X and Y. • When T results in reversing a positive relationship between Qxy, then T must have same sign correlations with X and Y.

More Related