1 / 20

Is Free Care Truly Free and Equitable? The Case of Liberia CHALLENGES & LESSONS LEARNED

Is Free Care Truly Free and Equitable? The Case of Liberia CHALLENGES & LESSONS LEARNED. S. Tornorlah Varpilah Tesfaye Dereje Chris Atim . Major Health Indicators. Major Causes of Morbidity. Liberia’s Free Health Care Policy.

havyn
Download Presentation

Is Free Care Truly Free and Equitable? The Case of Liberia CHALLENGES & LESSONS LEARNED

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is Free Care Truly Free and Equitable? The Case of LiberiaCHALLENGES & LESSONS LEARNED S. Tornorlah Varpilah Tesfaye Dereje Chris Atim

  2. Major Health Indicators

  3. Major Causes of Morbidity

  4. Liberia’s Free Health Care Policy • Basic Package of Health Services • Maternal and Newborn health • Child Health • Adolescent, Sexual and Reproductive Health • Disease prevention, control and management • Essential Emergency Treatment

  5. No User fee Policy Mandate “In light of crushing levels of poverty, the ministry has decided to suspend user fees at the primary health care level” “Suspension will remain in place until the socio-economic situation improves and financial management systems perform” National Health Policy (P. 14) “In accordance with MOHSW policy, user fees for services included in the Basic Package will be suspended at all public facilities” National Health Plan (P. 6)

  6. Health Financing Landscape Donors 47% Households 35% • Private Providers • 53% Government 15% • Black Baggers/ shops • 19% Other Private 3% • Government Facilities • 15% • Pharmacies • 9% • Traditional Healers • 4% • Total Health Spending ~ $105 Million (~$29 per capita) Source: MOHSW, National Health Account 2007/08

  7. Burden of HH Health Spending Share of Household Spending on Health (Among HHs that Reported OOP) Rural Urban • Share of Health Spending out of total Household Spending • Overall: 3.3% • For Households that reported out of pocket spending: 9% (catastrophic by the 5% rule of thumb) • The burden worsens for the lower income households Wang, 2009: Using 2008Community Survey data

  8. Who’s Utilizing Government Health Services? Government Health Service Utilization by Expenditure Deciles Cumulative Share of Public Health Service Utilization Cumulative Share of Public Health Service Utilization Cumulative Share of Households Cumulative Share of Households Source: Ashagari & Wang, Benefit Incidence Analysis 2010

  9. Distribution of Public Subsidies • Generally, pro-rich distribution of Public subsidies (CI =0.203) • slightly pro-poor at the clinic level; • but Pro-rich when it comes to hospitals and health centers Source: Ashagari & Wang, Benefit Incidence Analysis 2010

  10. Shortage of Pharmaceuticals • Ensuring drug availability is still challenging for both • drugs flowing through National Drug Service and • vertical programs • An average 50% of Health Facilities face drug stock-outs at a particular point • Proportion of facilities with no stock-outs varied from virtually none to nearly 70%, ending the year around 50%. (Assessment of 103 facilities in 7 counties revealed (in 2010) • From households perspective: • Two-thirds complained about difficulties in accessing drugs (Community Survey for Health Seeking Behaviour) • Concerns about leakage of drugs at facility level. MOHSW/OPM, Health Financing Situational Analysis, 2011

  11. Poor Physical Access Average distance from Communities to Health Facilities by Counties Average distances to the nearest facility in most counties well beyond the effective 5 K.M. radius (one hour) established by the BPHS Source: MOHSW, Country Situational Analysis Report (Draft), 2010

  12. Unequal Distribution of Health Facilities Number of Clinics and Size of Catchment Population (2010) • Basing Liberia’s BPHS Standard: • 40% cater to population below threshold • 10% are over-catering Source: MOHSW, Country Situational Analysis Report (Draft), 2010

  13. Poor Clinical Quality Source: Quality Assurance Baseline Assessment Report (RBHS) Nov.2010

  14. Challenges/ Imbalance • Shortage of trained clinical health workers • Weak supply chain management system • Inadequate health facilities • Weak M&E system • Lack of standardized budgeting mechanism • Weak regulatory system for workers

  15. Progress on Production Targets

  16. Lessons Learnt (1) • Know the cost implications • Actuarial calculation taking into account anticipated utilization increases • Institute effective targeting mechanisms • Explore room to increase/ reallocate resources to the identified priority area

  17. Lessons Learnt (2) • Strengthen supply chain management system • Strengthen regulatory system • Strengthening Results Based Financing • Improve budgeting mechanisms to link resources required to health outcomes

  18. Lessons Learnt (3) Establish an effective monitoring and evaluation system Strengthen aid coordination mechanism Increase the number and quality of health workers

  19. Conclusion • Free Care (user fee removal) is not the final answer • If unaccompanied by additional reform measures to tackle expected supply side constraints (esp. given it generates demand that require catering) it: • Over-stretches the resources available at the public facilities with an impact on level and quality of services provided • Forcing the population to seek alternative care which tend to be either more expensive (private providers) or ineffective/dangerous (black baggers).

  20. Thank You

More Related