190 likes | 296 Views
Explore the reforms in insurance law in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, including duty of disclosure, misrepresentation, and remedies for breaches. Learn how these changes affect consumers and insurers.
E N D
Reform of Insurance Law: Lessons for New Zealand DLA Phillips Fox 15 May 2012 Rob MerkinUniversity of SouthamptonNorton Rose
The Common Law Position • Utmost good faith • Non-disclosure • Misrepresentation • Materiality • Inducement • Right to avoid for breach
New Zealand Modification I • Contractual Remedies Act 1979, sections 5- 6 • Misrepresentation only • Damages for breach of contract , not for misrepresentation • No right to avoid but right to cancel if significant effect on contract • Contracting out possible • Insurance Law Reform Act 1977, s 10 • Broker is agent of insurers for placement purposes
New Zealand Modification II • Misrepresentation only • Insurance Law Reform Act 1977, ss 4 , 7 (life) • Age. No avoidance, premium adjustment only • Other. No avoidance unless :substantially incorrect; material; and either fraudulent or within 3 years • Insurance Law Reform Act 1977, s 5 (non-life) • No avoidance unless: substantially incorrect; and material
Australian Modification I • Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) • Disclosure retained (s 21) but: prudent assured test; removed in most consumer cases with obligation to answer questions (s 21A); and available only with warning of duty (s 22) • Misrepresentation retained, but prudent assured test (s 26); silence is not misrepresentation (s 27); and ambiguities construed against insurers (s 23) • Remedies: inducement required; avoidance for fraud (subject to court discretion); otherwise restitution remedy (ss 28 and 31)
Australian Modification II: Life • Statement by life assured treated as statement by policyholder (s 25) • Age misstatements – no right to avoid but proportional remedy (s 30) • Other life misstatements – avoidance for fraud (subject to court discretion) but no avoidance for non-fraud after three years (s 29) • Member of group life scheme – treat as separate policyholder (s 32)
UK Reform: Background • Statements of Insurance Practice 1977 and 1986 • Insurance Ombudsman Bureau 1981-2001 • Financial Ombudsman Scheme 2001 • Insurance Conduct of Business Sourcebook 2005 (ICOB) • Insurance New Conduct of Business Sourcebook 2008 (ICOBS) • FSMA 2000, s 150
The path to reform • English and Scottish Law Commissions’ Reform Programme 2006-2013 • Issues papers on utmost good faith and warranties 2006-2007 • Report and draft Bill 2009 • Issues paper on micro-businesses 2010
Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 • Presented to Parliament May 2011 • House of Lords’, Special Committee Procedure • Passed March 2012 • Implementation delayed at least 12 months from passing
Scope of 2012 Act • Consumer: “an individual who enters into the contract wholly or mainly for purposes unrelated to the individual’s trade, business or profession” • Micro businesses not covered • Marine insurance covered • Contracting out not permitted
Duty of disclosure • Duty abolished • Common law abrogated • Marine Insurance Act modified
Misrepresentation I: duty • Sole duty “to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation” • No definition of misrepresentation • All statements to be representations and not warranties • Duty relates to: knowledge of fact; knowledge of truth; nature of answer; knowledge of relevance to risk
Misrepresentation II: scope of duty • Reasonableness to be determined in light of all circumstances • Test is that of reasonable consumer • Insurer’s knowledge of consumer to be taken into account • Circumstances include: type of contract; insurers’ advertising material; clarity and specificity of question; whether broker used
Misrepresentation III: “qualifying misrepresentations” • No remedy if consumer has acted reasonably • Remedy only If • consumer has acted deliberately, recklessly or carelessly AND • Insurer can show that the contract would not have been made at all, on those terms or on that premium but for misrepresentation
Misrepresentation IV: remedies • Deliberate or reckless: avoidance of policy and no return of premiums unless unfair • Careless • if policy would not have been made at all, avoidance and return of premiums • If policy would have been made on different terms, claims subject to those terms • If policy would have been made with higher premium, proportionate recovery only
Misrepresentation V: special cases • If careless misrepresentation discovered before loss, right of insurers to avoid general but not life policy • Variations induced by misrepresentation to be severed if possible • Group policies – each assured to be treated separately • Life of another – statements provided by life assured treated as given by policyholder
Intermediaries • No duty on broker acting for consumer to disclose material facts (section 19 of Marine Insurance Act 1906 • Consumer responsible for agent acting on his behalf • Test of whether agent acted independently in searching the market
Business Insurance • Micro-Businesses, Issues Paper 5, April 2009 • Micro-businesses to be treated as consumers • Definition of micro-business • Business Insurance and Warranties: Consultation Document due June 2012 • Final Report due 2013 • Business Insurance Bill 2013
New Zealand Proposals • NZLC 1998 – status quo • NZLC 2004 – restrictions on avoidance • Ministry of Economic Development 2006 and follow up • Retain duty of disclosure, but insurers to warn • Avoidance limited to: fraud; material failure to answer specific question; avoidance within 30 days; reinsurance • Series of non-avoidance remedies, • Broker, whose agent?