1 / 34

Muon simulations

Muon simulations. Anna Kiseleva. Outline. Muon system 2006 New Mu on Ch amber system ( MuCh ) Track finding und selection Results for low-mass vector mesons J/ ψ simulations Detector resolution study: preliminary results Conclusions and next steps. MuCh system 2006.

haruki
Download Presentation

Muon simulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Muon simulations Anna Kiseleva

  2. Outline • Muon system 2006 • New Muon Chamber system (MuCh) • Track finding und selection • Results for low-mass vector mesons • J/ψ simulations • Detector resolution study: preliminary results • Conclusions and next steps

  3. MuCh system 2006 • Outside of the magnet • Detector in front of the system • First thin absorber • Thick last absorber • 10 cm gap • Distance – 5.5 m 51020 30 120 cm W Fe C 551cm 0 cm 150 cm 10 cm

  4. Problems STS for MuCh MuCh at 25 AGeV 1 2 MAPS? 0 123 4 5 6 Track reconstruction 3 ωat 25 AGeV: S/B = 8×10-2 efficiency = 4.4% too many μ from weak decays! ● 50 KeV E-cutoff

  5. Problems Track reconstruction 3 ωat 25 AGeV: S/B = 8×10-2 efficiency = 4.4% too many μ from weak decays! μ π

  6. Modifications STS for MuCh Increasing of the pipe hole 1 2 no MAPS! 5.7˚(0.1 rad) 3.0˚ 0 1 23 4 5 6 ωat 15 AGeV: MAPS no MAPS S/B 8×10-2 7×10-2 efficiency 2.4% 2.2% More compact MuCh! ωat 25 AGeV: old new S/B 8×10-2 8×10-2 efficiency 4.4% 3.6% 3

  7. MuCh detector 2007 • Fist absorber inside of the magnet • Last STS as a first detector • First thick absorber • 5 cm gap • Distance – 2.6 m (instead of 5.5 m) 20 20 20 30 35 cm 260cm Fe Fe Fe Fe Fe 5 cm 0 cm 102.5 cm

  8. Max rate of particles 0 1 2 3 4 5 Energy of beam ● 15 AGeV ● 25 AGeV ● 35 AGeV

  9. STS Hybrid (750 μm) 30 cm 40 cm Strip (400 μm) 50 cm 60 cm 75 cm 100 cm

  10. CBM setup STS MuCh TRD ToF

  11. Simulations • Signals (Pluto): • ρ, ω, φ, η and ηDalitz • J/ψ • Background (UrQMD): • central Au+Au at 15, 25 and 35 AGeV • Statistics: • 25 AGeV – 20k events • 15 and 35 AGeV – 10k events

  12. Hit producers • STS: • stsDigiVersion = "v05a" • 2 hybrid + 4 strip detectors • MuCh: • 100 μm space resolution • 80 πsec time resolution • ToF: • 0.2 cm space resolution • 80 πsec time resolution

  13. Tracking • STS track reconstruction: • ≥ 4 STS hits • χ2primary vertex cut • MuCh track finder: • track selection – hard and soft • χ2track • ToF hit finder: • χ2hit position

  14. CBM STS MuCh TRD ToF

  15. Tacking into account ToF information PMuCh – Kalman Filter track extrapolation MuCh ToF L PToF = mμ × β × γ β = , t = TToF – TMuCh γ = L c × t 1 √1 – β2

  16. PToF vs. Plast MuCh φ signal background

  17. PToF vs. Plast MuCh: cuts 1 – branch cut φ signal background 2 – cone cut

  18. 25 AGeV Results without cuts Branch cut Cone cut ————— S/B ratio ——————————————————————— ω φ η ηDalitz ρ ω φ η ηDalitz ρ = 0.2 = 0.05 = 0.004 = 0.05 = 0.003 = 2.6 = 5.2 = 1.2 = 0.3 = 2.2 = 0.4 = 0.2 = 0.008 = 0.1 = 0.005 = 1.3 = 2.6 = 0.6 = 0.2 = 1.0 = 0.5 = 0.2 = 0.01 = 0.2 = 0.007 = 1.1 = 2.2 = 0.5 = 0.2 = 0.7 [0.2; 0.3] GeV/c2 [0.2; 0.9] GeV/c2 ————— Efficiency (%) —————————————————————

  19. 25 AGeV Invariant mass spectrum signals: ρ ω φ η ηDalitz — background — background+signals branch time cut

  20. 25 AGeV Invariant mass spectrum signals: ρ ω φ η ηDalitz — background — background+signals branch time cut

  21. 25 AGeV Rapidity of reco ρ0 need more statistics!

  22. Types of tracks μ hard μ soft

  23. 25 AGeV L β = c × t Cuts for the soft tracks reconstructed on STS momentum β parameter from time measurements mean ± 2σ mean ± 2σ —ρ signal — background — gauss fit —ω signal — background — gauss fit

  24. 25 AGeV Results (h-s pairs) hard μ: with branch time cut soft μ: with momentum cut without time with time information information without cuts ————— S/B ratio ——————————————————————— ω φ η ηDalitz ρ ω φ η ηDalitz ρ = 0.02 = 0.006 = 0.0007 = 0.009 = 0.0003 = 2.2 = 3.0 = 1.4 = 0.4 = 1.6 = 0.09 = 0.04 = 0.002 = 0.02 = 0.0008 = 1.4 = 1.8 = 0.9 = 0.3 = 0.9 = 0.15 = 0.06 = 0.003 = 0.02 = 0.001 = 1.2 = 1.6 = 0.8 = 0.2 = 0.8 [0.2; 0.3] GeV/c2 [0.2; 0.9] GeV/c2 ————— Efficiency (%) —————————————————————

  25. 25 AGeV Rapidity of reco ρ0 — hard-hard (h-h) pairs — hard-soft (h-s) pairs —h-h + h-s 2 times more statistics!

  26. 25 AGeV Efficiency of ρ0RECO (h-h+h-s)  ▼  ▲ ▲   full ptρ(GeV/c): < 0.2 [0.2, 0.4] [0.4, 0.6] [0.6, 0.8] [0.8, 1.0] > 1.0

  27. 15 AGeV 25 AGeV 35 AGeV h-s h-h h-s h-h h-s h-h ————— S/B ratio ————————————————————————— ω φ η ηDalitz ρ ω φ η ηDalitz ρ 0.19 0.4 0.03 0.07 0.004 0.008 0.04 0.05 0.002 0.003 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.06 0.8 0.4 0.15 0.4 0.06 0.2 0.003 0.008 0.02 0.1 0.001 0.005 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.6 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.14 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.002 0.006 0.03 0.04 0.001 0.003 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.8 [0.2; 0.3] GeV/c2 [0.2; 0.9] GeV/c2 ————— Efficiency (%) ——————————————————————— Results hard μ: with branch time cut soft μ: with momentum and time cut

  28. Invariant mass spectra hard-hard pairs: background + signals  35 AGeV  25 AGeV  15 AGeV — background

  29. 20 20 20 30 35 100 cm Fe Fe Fe Fe Fe Fe J/ψ simulations: add 1m Fe central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV meangauss± 2σ • STS track reconstruction: • ≥ 4 STS hits • χ2primary vertex cut • MuCh track finder: • track selection – hard tracks • χ2track no cut on pt and opening angle!

  30. J/ψ simulations: cuts without cuts —pt > 1 GeV/c —pt > 1 GeV/c + αopening> 12˚ central Au+Au collisions at 25 AGeV

  31. Acceptance of reco J/ψ 4π without cuts % pt > 1 GeV/c %

  32. MuCh position resolution position resolution: —— 100μm —— 300μm —— 600μm ——900μm tracking: errorstrack extrapolation~ resolutiondetector

  33. Next steps Conclusions on muon detection in CBM • Promising results for low-mass vector mesons • Excellent S/B ratio for J/ψ • GEANE for MuCh track propagation • Global tracking MuCh→TRD→ToF • Pile-up of secondary electrons • Realistic MuCh hit producer

  34. Thank you for your attention!

More Related