1 / 10

Partnerships for International Research and Education

Partnerships for International Research and Education. Results of 2007 Competition. Partnerships for International Research and Education. Program Objectives: Support research and education excellence Provide meaningful international research experiences for U.S. students and faculty

haracha
Download Presentation

Partnerships for International Research and Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Partnerships for International Research and Education Results of 2007 Competition

  2. Partnerships for International Research and Education • Program Objectives: • Support research and education excellence • Provide meaningful international research experiences for U.S. students and faculty • Seek substantive intellectual contributions from international collaborators who bring unique capabilities to the research activity • Develop new collaborative models for international research and education

  3. Partnerships for International Research and Education • Program Details: • FY 2007 Competition (preproposal stage) • 516 Preliminary Proposals received • 199 institutions submitted • All 50 states represented plus DC & Puerto Rico • Almost 30% were in ENG disciplines; 20% MPS; 16% GEO; 14% BIO; 12% SBE; 11% CISE • China most popular partner country

  4. Partnerships for International Research and Education • FY 2007 Competition (full proposal stage) • 69 Full Proposals received, 71 invited • 58 institutions submitted • 29 states represented plus DC • Almost 30% were in ENG disciplines; 17% GEO; 16% MPS; 13% BIO; 13% SBE; 10% CISE; 3% OCI • China most popular partner country (10 props)

  5. Partnerships for International Research and Education • FY 2005 Competition • 12 awards started with $5M in OISE funds and $1.55M in non-OISE funds • FY 2007 Competition • 20 awards started with $7M in OISE funds and $2.25M in non-OISE funds

  6. Partnerships for International Research and Education • Awards by PI/Institution • Axinn – Univ of Michigan • Bean – Univ of Kansas • Carpenter – Old Dominion Univ • Chaudhry – Univ of S. Carolina • Datye – Univ of New Mexico • Deng – Florida International Univ • Hase – Texas Tech Univ • Krishnaswamy – Northwestern • Liu – Univ Missouri-Columbia • Mauricio – Univ of Georgia

  7. Partnerships for International Research and Education • Awards by PI/Institution • Moreno – Univ of North Dakota • Newman – NYU • Oh – Drexel Univ • Petraitis – Univ of Pennsylvania • Rauschecker – Georgetown Univ • Rodgers – Wayne State Univ • Ryu – RPI • Saleska – Univ of Arizona • Smith – Ohio Univ • Winkler – Cornell Univ

  8. Partnerships for International Research and Education • AWARD ANALYSIS • Researchers supported– • Senior level – 124 (6.2 per award) • Postdocs – 87 (4.4 per award) • Grad Students – 622 (31.1 per award) • Undergrads – 566 (28.3 per award)

  9. Partnerships for International Research and Education • AWARD ANALYSIS • Awards by Directorate– • MPS 6 (30% of awards, 16% of props) • BIO 5 (25% of awards, 13% of props) • ENG 4 (20% of awards, 30% of props) • SBE 2 (10% of awards, 13% of props) • GEO 1 (5% of awards, 17% of props) • CISE 1 (5% of awards, 10% of props) • OCI 1 (5% of awards, 3% of props)

  10. Partnerships for International Research and Education • AWARD ANALYSIS • Awards by Region– • Europe & Eurasia - 8 (40% of awards, 43% of proposals) • East Asia & Pacific - 7 (35% of awards, 29% of proposals) • Americas - 4 (20% of awards, 14% of proposals) • ANESA - 1 (5% of awards, 13% of proposals)

More Related