1 / 51

Exploring Higgs and SUSY at e+e- Linear Collider

This article discusses the potential of the e+e- Linear Collider (ILC) and its future upgrades, such as CLIC, for studying the Higgs boson and Supersymmetry (SUSY). It highlights the importance of precision measurements and benchmark processes for validating anticipated results. The article also presents various physics signatures and event topologies that need to be measured with high accuracy at the ILC.

hansonl
Download Presentation

Exploring Higgs and SUSY at e+e- Linear Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Higgs and SUSY at an e+e- Linear Collider

  2. Towards Physics at the Linear Collider Naturalness gives an indication on the scale of New Physics, once mH is known; Expect Higgs discovery at Tevatron or LHC • EW data from LEP/SLC/Tevatron • indicate that mH is light, or there • is New Physics of certain specific • types [Peskin, Wells, 2001]: • if mH < 180 GeV rich program • of precision mapping of Higgs • profile at ILC; • if NP, ILC/CLIC best suited • for detailed mapping through • EW data + direct searches. mH < 182 GeV

  3. Studying NP at Colliders beyond LHC ILC to provide point-like particle collisions from 0.3 TeV up to ~ 1 TeV with tunable centre-of-mass energies, particle species and polarization states; In a farther future, CLIC multi-TeV e+e- collider may further push energy frontier up to 3 – 5 TeV.

  4. ILC Energy Accelerating Gradient vs. RF Frequency: [ILC 0.5 – 1.0 TeV] [CLIC 1.0-5.0 TeV] CLIC ILC

  5. Progress with S.C. Cavity Gradient

  6. Towards Detailed Analyses Essential to validate anticipated results with analyses based on full G4 simulation and reconstruction; LC physics program presents significant challenges to detector design and machine-detector interface to preserve the signature e+e- clean event reconstruction; Parallel effort in providing reconstruction tools with required precision;

  7. Benchmarks for the ILC Develop list of benchmark processes where i) ILC physics scenarios broadly covered, ii) benchmarks robust and retain wider scope, iii) detector performance manifest in direct way, iv)target performance motivated by quantitatively well-defined requirements.

  8. Benchmarks for the ILC

  9. ILC Physics Signatures ILC Physics program has possibly the broadest range of particle kinematics and event topologies; Within a single physics scenario, DM-motivated Supersymmetry, below are some of the signal signatures which need to be measured with O(0.1 - 1%) accuracy:

  10. Higgs Sector Profile at ILC T Barklow, hep-ph/0411221

  11. H0gbb, cc, gg at 0.35 - 0.5 TeV Determination of Higgs hadronic branching fractions, one of the most crucial tests of the Higgs mechanism of mass generation and unique to the ILC for the experimental accuracy needed to match theory uncertainties and probe extended Higgs sector models;

  12. H0gbb, cc, gg at 0.35 - 0.5 TeV Determination of Higgs hadronic branching fractions, one of the most crucial tests of the Higgs mechanism of mass generation and unique to the ILC; Light Higgs boson offers opportunity and challenge: couplings to b, c and t quark accessible, but need to tag b, c, light jets with 70 : 3 : 7 ratio in signal. Kuhl, Desch LC-PHSM-2007-001

  13. H0gbb, cc, gg at 0.35 - 0.5 TeV Yu et al. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 50 (2007); Kuhl, Desch LC-PHSM-2007-001; Ciborowski,Luzniak Snowmass 2005 Degradation in performance correspond to 20-30% equivalent Luminosity loss.

  14. H gt+t-and m+m- Determination of gHmmcoupling important to test Higgs mechanism in lepton sector, high energy e+e- collisions offer a unique opportunity; Sensitivity being assessed for 0.35 – 0.5 TeV in Higgstrahlung process, Process accessible in WW fusion at higher energy, precision measurement in multi-TeV collisions: MB, 2002

  15. e+e-gneneHgm+m- at 3 TeV s(e+e-gHnn) = 0.51 pb for MH=118.8 GeV, Ecm = 3 TeV BR(Hgmm) = 0.026 % SM Background s(e+e-gmmnn) = 4.7 fb Mokka+Marlin SiD Model 3 TeV Preliminary Analysis performed using SiD model in MOKKA 06-01 and Marlin 00.09.06; Results for 3 ab-1 MB, 2007

  16. e+e-gnnH0gbb at 1 TeV Large WW fusion cross section at large Ecm gives access to gHbb over full range compatible with LEP-2 +EW data: For mH = 200 GeV, Hgbb becomes rare decay (2 x 10-3), still ILC at 1 TeV can get its branching fraction to 9% accuracy: T Barklow

  17. Determining the Higgs Potential Fundamental test of Higgs potential shape through independent Determination of gHHHin double Higgs production Opportunity unique to the ILC, LHC cannot access double H production and SLHC may have only marginal accuracy; several LC analyses pioneered by P. Gay et al.

  18. Double Higgstrahlung at 0.5-0.8 TeV Double WW Fusion at 1-3 TeV HH Mass Decay Angle MB, Boos, Yao, 2005

  19. Barklow, LCWS07

  20. e+e- gH0H0Z0 at 0.5 TeV with LDC Isolating HHZ signal (s=0.18fb) from tt (s=530fb), ZZZ (s=1.1fb), tbtb (s=0.7fb) and ttZ (s=0.7fb) is an experimental tour-de-force; b-tagging and jet energy resolution essential to suppress backgrounds; Boumediene, Gay, LCWS07

  21. e+e- gH0H0Z0 at 0.5 TeV with LDC Understand impact of detector performance on triple Higgs couplings determination accuracy at ILC Parametric Simulation L = 2 ab-1 Boumediene, Gay, LCWS07

  22. e+e- gH0H0Z0 at 0.5 TeV with SiD Re-analysis of HHZ production with realistic, yet parametric simulation of SiD detector and full SM backgronds; Emphasis of Particle Flow performance and algorithm optimisation; Barklow, LCWS07

  23. The Higgs Profile and the Physics beyond In models with extended Higgs sector, such as SUSY, Higgs couplings get shifted w.r.t. SM predictions: Desch et al., hep-ph/0406322

  24. The Effect of Theory Uncertainties Droll, Logan, PRD76 (2007)

  25. Invisible Higgs Decays In ADD model mixing of Higgs and KK graviscalar and H decay in graviscalar pairs generate invisible width which can be detected at ILC; Study of invisible H decay and at ILC allows to tightly constrain model parameters: LHC ILC MB, Dominici, Gunion, Wells, LCWS05

  26. Invisible Higgs Decays Radion mixing in RS models shifts Higgs couplings; Possible reduction of Higgs yields at LHCbut clear signature in ILC data from precision data on bb and WW couplings: MB, De Curtis, Dominici et al., PLB568 (2003)

  27. DM-motivated SUSY at ILC If DM due to WIMPs manifesting New Physics beyond SM, next generation of hadron (LHC, SLHC) and lepton collider (ILC, CLIC) expected to discover direct signal of this NP and perform detailed studies; Collider data will combine with direct searches and satellite experiments to understand DM properties from microscopic to macroscopic scales; Supersymmetry offers attractive framework to study opportunities at colliders experiments;

  28. Irreducible SM bkg removed by using polarised beams Model Independent WIMP Detection at ILC Analysis performed with full G4 simulation and reconstruction; C Bartels, J List

  29. Model Independent WIMP Detection at ILC Alternatively, use photon spectrum directly and scan Mc – annihilation fraction; Assume beam polarisation, realistic ECal resolution; Konar, Matchev, Perelstein et al

  30. Solving the SUSY Inverse Problem Resolve the degeneracies arising by reconstructing fundamental parameters from LHC experimental observables; Arkani-Hamed, Kane, Thaler, Wang, hep-ph/0512190 242 models with 164 degenerate pairs at LHC 82 models, 72 pairs visible at 0.5 TeV ILC; 55 pairs distinguishable at ILC; 75% of accessible model pairs degenerate at LHC can be solved at LC, but large Ecm essential Study LHC-degenerate models at 0.5 TeV and 1 TeV ILC, J Hewett, T Rizzo, Gainer et al.

  31. Systematic study of ILC reach promoted by US study group on ILC-Cosmo Connections Cosmologically interesting cMSSM Regions and Benchmark points Compute RGEs with Isajet 7.69 and estimate dark matter density from Isajet spectrum and couplings with MicrOMEGAS 1.3 and DarkSUSY 4.0 J Ellis, K Olive, MB, M Peskin,…

  32. Constraining the Higgs Sector with WCDM Allanach et al.,hep-ph/0507283

  33. SUSY Bulk Region Heavy part of SUSY spectrum decouples from Wcdetermination LCC1 Benchmark

  34. A Comparison of DM density accuracy at LHC and ILC in Bulk Region WMAP Baltz,MB,Peskin,Wizanski, PRD74 (2006) but bulk region not quite representative of SUSY phase space...

  35. Stop co-Annihilation in Baryogenesis motivated Scenarios LHC ILC Light scalar top, nearly degenerate with neutralino, provides efficient co-annihilation and evades Tevatron searches due to small ET. Baryogenesis constraints push towards heavy scalar and introduces CP-violating phase in m. Scenario shares several features characteristic of FP region but requires analysis of real Z0 and light stops. Carena, Freytas, hep-ph/0608255

  36. Heavy Higgses at LHC/SLHC and DM F Gianotti

  37. Heavy Higgs Sector in MSSM Desch et al., hep-ph/0406229

  38. Heavy MSSM Higgses , Wch2 and LCC4

  39. The Higgs Sector of the LCC4 Point LCC4 point in A0 Funnel region Benchmark point defined in cMSSM LCC4 Benchmark

  40. Selection Criteria • General selection cuts: • at least 4 hadronic jets (JADE algorithm) • (at least 5 ptc/jet); • force event to 4 jets; • apply di-jet btagging; • reconstruction Efficiency = 40 %

  41. Selection Criteria Etot

  42. 4-jet Kinematic Fit Perform constrained kinematic fit to 4-jet system, which uses Lagrange multipliers and minimises a c2 constructed from the measured energies and directions of the jets; Impose centre-of-mass energy and momentum conservation; Consider jj jj pairing giving smallest mass difference and plot di-jet masses Mjj (2 entries / evt); Port of PUFITC+ developed for DELPHI at LEP2 (N Kjaer, M Mulders) to MarlinReco framework MB, Hooberman

  43. Compare Full G4+Reco to Parametric Simulation SIMDET G4+Marlin SIMDET Fast Simulation Full G4+ MarlinReco Preliminary MB, LCWS04 MB, Hooberman, LCWS07

  44. Further DM Constraints from HA BR(A gbb) Analysis of Markov Chain MSSM scans to identify further observables to possibly improve DM density determination at the ILC

  45. A0 Branching Fraction Determination b Contrast bbtt to bbbb based on missing energy, nb. of hadronic jets and jj+recoil masses; bbtt Reconstruction Efficiency 35% b b b Determine BR(Agtt) from rate of bbtt to bbbb tags, WW + ZZ background appears small; b Expect ~ 0.15 ~0.07 t t b

  46. Stau Tri-linear Coupling - Atau Constrain Atau through H gtt decays: Stau Couplings to H/A: Atau ~~ In A funnel, MA<Mt1+Mt2 and the only such decay allowed by CP for the pseudoscalar Agt1t2is not available; Heavy H0 gt1t1 scales with Atau and can be used to constrain stau trilinear coupling in this regime.

  47. Stau Tri-linear Coupling - Atau H/A Branching Ratios vs Atau Atau scan for LCC4 MSSM parameters withHDECAY2.0 Large Hgt1t1 can be detected by standard bbtt + bbbb analysis and used to constrain Stau trilinear coupling

  48. DM density accuracy for LCC4 with HA analysis Phys.Rev.D74:103521,2006. MB, Hooberman, Kelley

  49. Collider Experiments on Dark Matter Dark Matter Density g0.08 Baltz, MB, Peskin, Wiszanski, PRD74 (2006)

  50. dW/W ILC Accuracy within MSSM on cMSSM plane 0.08 0.18 J Ellis, K Olive, MB et al.

More Related