1 / 15

Excess Dosing of Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Agents in the Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndro

Excess Dosing of Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Agents in the Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Alexander KP et al, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16 .

hanne
Download Presentation

Excess Dosing of Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Agents in the Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndro

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Excess Dosing of Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Agents in the Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Alexander KP et al, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16 CRUSADE is a National Quality Initiative of Duke Clinical Research, funded Schering Corporation. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership provides an unrestricted grant in support of the program.

  2. Background • Anti-platelet and anti-thrombin agents are efficacious and thus recommended treatments for patients with NSTE ACS (AHA/ACC Guidelines) • Current QI efforts focus on increasing their use in this population

  3. Major Bleeding in NSTE ACS Trials (and CRUSADE) % Bleeding per Trial Definition Major Bleeding: ICH + HCT drop >12% or 15% drop ± transfusion Cohen NEJM 1997; Petersen JAMA 2004; PURSUIT NEJM 1998; Boersma Lancet 2002

  4. Purpose • Determine the frequency with which UF heparin, LMWH, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are dosed in accordance with recommendations • Determine patient and hospital factors associated with excess dosing • Determine the associations between excess dosing and risk for major bleeding

  5. Methods • All CRUSADE NSTE ACS pts (n= 30,316 at 384 sites) • January - December 2004 • Excluded if missing dose, creatinine clearance, weight, or transferred prior to discharge • Grouped according to acute therapy • Predictors of excess dose • Relationship btw dose and major bleeding • Transfer and CABG patients excluded • Major bleeding was defined as a drop in Hct ≥ 12%, RBC transfusion, intracranial hemorrhage

  6. Appropriate Dosing of Acute Medications* in CRUSADE • Unfractionated Heparin • Use weight-based dosing • Bolus: 60- 70 U/kg  Infusion: 12-15 U/kg/hr • LMW Heparin: Enoxaparin • Use weight-based dosing (0.95-1.05 mg/kg) • GP IIb-IIIa: Tirofiban •  Bolus to 6 µg/kg, if CrCl < 30 mL/min •  Infusion to 0.05 µg/kg/min, if CrCl < 30 mL/min • GP IIb-IIIa: Eptifibatide •  Infusion to 1.0 µg/kg, if CrCl < 50 mL/min * Dosing information collected in CRUSADE beginning Q1 2004

  7. Characteristics by Acute Antithrombotic Therapy UFH LMWH GP IIb/IIIa (13,298) (12,526) (13,967) Age (median) 65.2 67.1 63.1 Female (%) 35.8 39.5 32.8 Renal Insuff (%) 12.5 10.7 6.8 CrCl (mean) 58.3 57.0 64.1 Weight (median kg) 82 81 84 Diabetes (%) 31.8 32.8 29.3 Signs of CHF (%) 20.4 23.0 15.0 Catheterization (%) 86.7 79.0 90.7 PCI (%) 58.4 47.8 74.3 Cardiac Markers (+) 88.7 89.1 89.9 Academic Center (%) 36 22 30 Cardiologist (%) 64 56 69 Alexander KA, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16

  8. Predictors of Excess Dosing UFH LMWH GP IIb/IIIa Age >75 0.81 0.75 14.39 Renal Insuf. 1.25 0.82 4.12 Female - 0.73 3.74 Weight (per 5kg ↓) 1.28 1.26 1.02 Alexander KA, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16

  9. Excess Dose of GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitors 91% 65% 46% % Excess Dose 26% Age (yrs) Sex Serum Creatinine (if CrCl <50cc/min) Alexander KA, Circulation 2005;17:II-431

  10. Estimated Creatinine Clearance (CrCl)Cockroft-Gault Calculations assuming a 150 pound woman CrCl = (140-age) x weight in kg ---------------------------      X 0.85 (if female) (72 X serum creatinine) 

  11. Antithrombotic Dose and Major BleedingNon-CABG and Non- Transfer Population P<0.0001 P<0.0002 P= NS Major Bleeding (%) 11.5% n=6,924 n=7,484 n=8,085 Treatment Group Alexander KA, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16

  12. Cumulative Effects of Dosing Errors Combined Use of Heparins and GP IIb-IIIa 11.5% n=2,139 (35%) n=419 (7%) n=3,590 (58%) Excess Dose Among Patients Given Two Antithrombotic Agents (n=6,148) Alexander KA, JAMA 2005;294:3108-16

  13. Adjusted Risk of Major Bleeding (age, sex, renal insufficiency, weight, CHF, SBP) Excess vs. No Excess • UFH OR 1.08 (0.94 – 1.26) • LMWH OR 1.39 (1.110 – 1.74) • GP IIb/IIIa OR 1.36 (1.10 – 1.68)

  14. Conclusions • Excess dosing is common for anti-thrombotic therapies • Disproportionately affects the thin, elderly, women, and those with renal failure • After accounting for pt risk, excess dosing remains a significant predictor of bleeding • Particularly when multiple agents in excess or major excess given • Appropriately dosed pts have bleeding rates approaching those in trials and better than average community population

  15. Optimizing Dosing of AnticoagulantsSteps for Improvement • Determine CrCl and weight for all patients upon hospital admission • Link drug dosing with weight and CrCl • Integrate clinical pharmacists into ED and CCU environments to monitor dosing in “real time” • Quality metrics should monitor “how” as well as “if” evidence-based medicines are given • Ideal comparisons between antithrombotic strategies would consider only those patients who receive recommended dosing

More Related