1 / 24

Andrew Leader Flinders University

Perceptions Of Executive Government Leadership In The Age Of Engagement and Community Based Decision Making . Andrew Leader Flinders University. Project aim. Explore potential impacts of community engagement on democratic society and institutions http ://vocaroo.com/i/s1ze4wlPe3M7.

hana
Download Presentation

Andrew Leader Flinders University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Perceptions Of Executive Government Leadership In The Age Of Engagement and Community Based Decision Making Andrew Leader Flinders University

  2. Project aim Explore potential impacts of community engagement on democratic society and institutions http://vocaroo.com/i/s1ze4wlPe3M7

  3. Policy challenges Climate change Environmental degradation Wealth disparity Resource availability

  4. New approaches Community • problem? • action • opportunity • ideas • risk

  5. New approaches generate new risks and opportunities that need to be better understood

  6. A bit about me....

  7. Engagement is a powerful new force that could reshape our government systems

  8. Traditional hierarchical model of government Politicians Bureaucrats Citizens

  9. Community based decision making - Risk and reward

  10. Consequences - Need for better understanding

  11. Focus of the research • Community • Senior government decision makers • Political executive government

  12. Traditional hierarchical model of government Politicians Bureaucrats Citizens

  13. Political executive government sub-group Autoethnographic approach

  14. Definitions • Community – 1.6 million individuals • Senior government decision makers – 1,400 individuals • Political exe3cutive government – 450 individuals

  15. My approach to consultation and engagement Equity

  16. Senior government decision makers Community Political executive government

  17. Methodological approach • Complimentary approach • Interviews • Questionnaires

  18. Intent Differences in perceptions and expectations between sub-groups

  19. Identifying members of each sub-group

  20. Ethical risks Confidential process

  21. Complexities of researching in this area Mirrors the complexities of community engagement

  22. The questions • Perception • Outcomes • Any differences

  23. Future areas of research

  24. Expected outcomes and findings

More Related