1 / 36

Speech Processing Final Project

Speech Processing Final Project. Estimation of pole and zero model in voiced speech by Rafael A Alvarez. Introduction.

hamal
Download Presentation

Speech Processing Final Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Speech Processing Final Project Estimation of pole and zero model in voiced speech by Rafael A Alvarez

  2. Introduction This presentation shows the results of speech estimation using an pole-zero model. The pole-zero model was derived using the Linear prediction coding and homomorphic filtering methods. When both methods are combined the combined method is called the homomorphic prediction method. Several signals will be analyzed and the problems encounter in each case will be presented.

  3. Objectives This project attempts to address the following areas: • Modeling of speech using a pole-zero model • Modeling of speech using Linear prediction and homomorphic filtering methods. • Results of estimating poles using Hommorphic Prediction. • Results of Zeros estimation using inverse-filtering and Homomorphic Prediction. • Problems estimating the model. • Other possible applications .

  4. Gain Speech source Vocal track and lips radiation Mixer Speech modeling The complete discrete-time speech production model.

  5. Speech modeling • Periodic or voiced speech can be modeled with: Speech signal Gain Glottal flow Vocal track (poles and zeros) Radiation impedance

  6. Speech modeling • Complete transfer function of speech signal for voiced sound Radiation impedance Vocal tract zeros (min and max phase) Glottal flow Vocal tract poles

  7. Linear Prediction Analysis • Linear prediction coding approximates the system using an an all pole model. • The zero produced at the radiation of the lips is approximated by long set of poles (Not efficient) • The resulting Transfer function:

  8. Linear prediction analysis • Linear combination of past values • Time domain representation • When train of unit samples ug[n] = 0 then the above equation results in:

  9. Linear prediction analysis • Two implementations of this analysis are: • Covariance method • Considers the value outside the window • Autocorrelation method • Considers the values outside the window to be zero. • Uses a window like the hamming window

  10. Linear Prediction analysis • Results of LPC using autocorrelation methods

  11. Homomorphic filtering • Base on the concept of superposition • Can easy separate linearly combine systems. • Generalized superposition • Can separate non-linearly combine systems. • The following properties must apply • Canonical formulation of homomorphic system + + + + L y[n] x[n] : . . . .

  12. Homomorphic filtering • Homomorphic system for convolution • Applying the results from before on systems resulting from convolution gives: . . + + + log + + + . . exp

  13. Homomorphic filtering • Algorithm to combined homomorphic filtering and LPC w[n] x s[n] cepstrum liftering inv-cepstrum LPC • With the liftering operation (filtering) convolutionaly combined signals can be separated in the quefrency domain.

  14. Homomorphic filtering • Homomorphic filtering combined with LPC, Homomorphic prediction

  15. Homomorphic prediction • Combining the previous we can derived a pole-zero model estimation method. • Remembering from before the zero-pole model of speech was given by • Remember that multiplication in the frequency domain transform into convolution in the time domain.

  16. Homomorphic prediction • From the previous equation we have. S(z) = original signal P(z) = glottal flow train B(z)= vocal tract zeros A(z) = vocal track poles * The system zeros and glottal flow poles can be obtained by filtering the signal with the inverse vocal track poles. (Inverse filtering)

  17. Homomorphic prediction • An algorithm to estimate poles and zeros can be derived • First we obtain an approximation of our vocal tract poles as presented before, w[n] x s[n] LPC • w[n] must window an area free of zeros and glottal flow poles • The resulting impulse response should represent all the poles in the system. Then this result can be used to inverse filter the original signal.

  18. Homomorphic prediction • Zero and glottal flow deconvolution. • Separate the glottal flow from the zeros. • Separate min and max phase zeros. B(z)P(z) S(z) Inverse- filtering cepstrum P(z) inverse-cepstrum High liftering Bmax(z) B(z) Inverse-cepstrum High liftering Low liftering Bmin(z) Inverse-cepstrum Low liftering

  19. Homomorphic prediction • Example of “quefrency” domain signal of a voiced signal.

  20. Results • Signal #1 • First we examine a simple case of a synthesized signal Pitch period

  21. Homomorphic prediction • Zero free area of original signal, pitch-synchronized method L = glottal width (19) M= number of vocal tract zeros (2) I = zero free area of vocal tract (2 poles) L M I

  22. Results • Frequency response of the estimated poles of the vocal tract

  23. Results • Inverse-Filtered signal • After filtering only the glottal flow train and zeros remain

  24. Results • Cepstrum of inverse-filtered signal • By liftering(filtering) the high and low part of the cepstrum the glottal flow can be separated from the zeros.

  25. Results • Approximated glottal flow and zeros

  26. Results • Signal #2 • Second a more realistic signal.

  27. Results • Signal #2. Problems: • How many zeros? • What is the length of the glottal flow? • How many poles?

  28. Results • Signal #2 Why are the results so different?

  29. Results • Signal #2 • Signal #1 The autocorrelation function on Signal #2shows aliasing. The method will not work if the signal wasn’t sample at a high enough frequency.

  30. Results • Signal #3. Voice recorded at 20Khz Area extracted for processing

  31. Results • Extract area free of zeros Problems: • How many zeros? • 6 zeros • What is the length of the glottal flow? • 38 since its 20khz • How many poles? • 10 poles

  32. Results • Spectrum of zero-free area, all-pole approximation and original signal

  33. Results • Resulting inverse-filtered signal • Area should be flat if all the poles where approximated accurately. • Compare with other areas it seem flat.

  34. Possible enhancements • Implement a iterative algorithm that optimizes the results by combining different values for the different variables. • Length of glottal pulse • number of zeros • number of poles • Try to different approaches using the HF and LPC tools to get a better approximation. • Use homomorphic filtering to remove the zeros and/or glottal flow first. • Use pitch estimation algorithm to better establish the pitch period • Established a better relationship between the zeros and poles in the quefrency domain.

  35. Problems • Problems in the method: • Requires a good approximation of the area free of zeros • Requires a good approximation of the the number of zeros, poles and length of glottal flow • Requires a good approximation of the all pole approximation • Requires a high sampling rate of the original signal • May not work for high pitch voice

  36. Applicatoins • Possible applications include: • Speech synthesis : recreate human voice • Speech processing: machine human interaction • Speaker recognition: extraction of key features of the speaker

More Related