260 likes | 376 Views
This document provides an in-depth exploration of evaluation within health promotion, education, and disease prevention programs. It defines evaluation, outlining its purpose to assess the effectiveness, relevance, and impact of activities against defined objectives. The text covers various evaluation types, including process, impact, and outcome evaluations, along with specific examples of data collection methods and expected outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of using evidence to demonstrate program effectiveness to stakeholders, ultimately aiming to improve health status in targeted populations.
E N D
Evaluation 101 Prevention Education Meeting May 29, 2013
Definitions of Evaluation • Examine and judge carefully. • Determine value or worth. • Process that attempts to determine, systematically and objectively, the relevance, effectiveness, and impact of activities in light of their objectives.
Purpose of Evaluation • Use evidence to prove that a program has delivered intended services. • Show that program has made an impact on the health of a certain population. Windsor, Clark, Boyd, & Goodman. Evaluation of Health Promotion, Health Education, & Disease Prevention Programs
Purpose of Evaluation • To determine achievement of objectives related to improved health status • To improve program implementation • To provide accountability to funding agencies, community, and other stakeholders McKenzie, Neiger, & Smeltzer. Planning, Implementing, & Evaluating Health Promotion Programs
Outputs • The amount of product or service that the program intends to provide • Type of activity, product or service • andtarget audience Participants Clients Agencies Decision makers Customers Public Health care providers • Type of evaluation • process evaluation • Can also include satisfaction with activity/product/service
Short Term Outcomes • Immediate effects of activities including changes in Awareness Knowledge Attitudes Beliefs Values Opinions Aspirations Motivation Skills (knowledge) • Type of evaluation • impact evaluation
Intermediate Outcomes • Changes in behavior Risk factor reduction Norms Self management Policies Social action Practice Procedures Decision-making Demonstration of skills • Type of evaluation • impact evaluation
Long Term Outcomes • Changes in burden of disease, health status, or quality of life • prevalence or incidence • mortality • also social, economic, civic, environmental factors • Type of evaluation • outcome evaluation
Evaluation Terminology • Process evaluation • measurement of activities during implementation • Impact evaluation • measurement of immediate observable effects of a program including awareness, knowledge, attitudes, skills, and behaviors • Outcome evaluation • measurement of the ultimate goal of a program
Process Evaluation Data • Quantitative • Counts • # meetings held, # training sessions conducted, # of people who attended • Descriptive Statistics • mean satisfaction rating for event, percent of people who responded they liked the event • Qualitative • Descriptive information • description of event, date of event, location of event, description of who attended, what information was included during event
Process Evaluation Data • Monthly Progress Report • Example: • # professional training sessions/workshops conducted • # professionals trained • # informational materials/brochures distributed • # primary prevention education sessions conducted for students • # students attended primary prevention education sessions • # informational materials/brochures distributed • # sessions conducted with faith-based organizations • descriptions of topics covered during sessions
Impact Evaluation Data • Short term outcomes on a logic model • awareness, knowledge, attitude change data • Quantitative • data collected from surveys/questionnaires, written tests • Qualitative • data collected from surveys/questionnaires, interviews, focus groups
Impact Evaluation Data • Intermediate term outcomes on a logic model • behavior change data • Quantitative • BRFSS data • Qualitative • interviews, focus groups, observations
Impact Evaluation Data • Example: • The results of the pre/post knowledge tests indicted that participants’ knowledge about healthy relationships increased by 500%. • The results indicated that students learned to use negotiation techniques as assessed by post-test. • Responses on the modeling questionnaire indicate that 85% of students would intervene when other students act disrespectfully. • School administrators at 10 schools strengthened their anti-bullying policies.
Outcome Evaluation Data • Long term outcomes Changes in health status • Quantitative • YRBS data • BRFSS data • Vital data • Hospital Discharge data • ER or ED data • Qualitative • Interviews, focus groups
Outcome Evaluation Data • Example: • 2007 YRBS • 29.9% of high school students had been in a physical fight at least once in the past year • 11.8% of high school students had been hit by their boy/girlfriend in the past year • 9.5% of high school students have been forced to have sexual intercourse against their will • 2008 BRFSS • 12.5% of adult females have been victims of forcible rape • 16.7% of adult females have either been raped or have experienced an attempted rape • 4.7% of adult males have either been raped or have experienced an attempted rape
ABCDE Method of Writing Outcomes • A – Audience (Who will change?) • B – Behavior (What will change?) • C – Condition (By When?) • D – Degree (How Much?) • E – Evidence (How will the change be measured?)
Evaluation Activity • Developing a data collection tool
General Evaluation Guides • The Program Managers Guide to Evaluation • http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/pmguide/pmguide_toc.html • Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide • http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf • Developing a Logic Model: Teaching and Training Guide • http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/pdf/lmguidecomplete.pdf • Understanding Evaluation: The Way to Better Prevention Programs • http://www.ed.gov/PDFDocs/handbook.pdf • Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook • http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub770.pdf
Topical Evaluation Guides • Core Performance Measures for Steps to a HealthierUS • http://www.cdc.gov/eval/steps/Steps%20Core%20Performance%20Measures%2007-2007.pdf • Introduction to Program Evaluation for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs • http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/tobacco_control_programs/surveillance_evaluation/evaluation_manual/00_pdfs/Evaluation.pdf • Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook • http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/health_professionals/interventions/handbook.pdf • CDC DASH Evaluation Briefs • http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/evaluation/resources.htm#4 • Strategic Planning Kit for School Health Programs • http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/evaluation/pdf/sp_kit/sp_toolkit.pdf • SMART Cards • http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/evaluation/pdf/SMARTcards.pdf
Violence Prevention Evaluation Guides • Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Programs Evaluation Guide • Book by CDC, 2007, can be ordered from • http://wwwn.cdc.gov/pubs/ncipc.aspx • Measuring Violence-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Influences Among Youths: A Compendium of Assessment Tools, Second Edition • http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/pdf/YV/YV_Compendium.pdf
Evaluation Websites • CDC’s Evaluation Framework • http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework.htm • Community Tool Box • http://ctb.ku.edu/en/ • American Evaluation Association • http://www.eval.org/ • Coalitions Work • http://coalitionswork.com/ • Writing Good Goals and Objectives • http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/dashoet/writing_good_goals/menu.html • Basic Guide to Program Evaluation • http://www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/fnl_eval.htm • University of Wisconsin Extension – Program Development and Evaluation • http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/index.html • Kellogg Foundation • http://www.wkkf.org/default.aspx?tabid=75&CID=281&NID=61&LanguageID=0