1 / 1

Weaving a successful CRM solution using Design Research

Weaving a successful CRM solution using Design Research Damien Fahy | Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, Nelson, New Zealand. Cooperation from BlueBerry IT. Supervisor Mark Caukill. 1. 4. Problem Identification & Motivation. Demonstration.

halima
Download Presentation

Weaving a successful CRM solution using Design Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Weaving a successful CRM solution using Design Research Damien Fahy | Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, Nelson, New Zealand Cooperation from BlueBerry IT Supervisor Mark Caukill 1 4 Problem Identification & Motivation Demonstration This was identified by the request of Blueberry IT to evaluating between threeCustomer Relationship Management (CRM) platforms based upon an analysis of the functioning and the user requirements. Upon further investigation it was found that there is a pattern of failure rates regarding CRM integration in businesses. The was a need for a system that increases CRM success. At the demonstration stage we were able to gauge to what capacity the artefact (the CRM system) was a success in addressing the problem in context and determine if it was ready for wider adoption in the environment. The CRM was deemed in a ready state for additional users after assessing the core functionality and resolving all the hot priority requests by the users. DESIGN RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Disciplinary Knowledge Metrics, Analysis Knowledge How to Knowledge Inference 2.Objectives of solution Understand and meet user and business requirements 4. Demonstration Prototype Deemed ready for users 1. Problem Identification & Motivation Create a user focused CRM for increased likelihood of success 3. Design & Development Create CRM Functional Prototype 5. Evaluation User Feedback and requests 6. Communication Publish outcome of success or failure! Theory SharePoint vs. Dynamics vs. Salesforce 5 Evaluation Nominal Process Sequence In the Evaluation stagetheprototype more users were added to the system and got to test and utilise it, these users were allowed to offer feedback through the governance of the CRM administrator. New requests of features from the users were categorised by them in levels of priority namely low, normal and high. Then these user requests were then set to a status based upon the state of condition they were in namely new, active and resolved. Any unresolved requests that needed clarification or adjustment were brought up at the weekly meeting. Design and Development entry point Figure: Adapted Design Science Research Methodology (Peffers, Tuunanen et al., 2008) Grasping the business needs and environment using personas 2 Objectives requirements gathering Suzy Thisinvolved questioning what a better CRM would accomplish by accessing the business and user requirements via context interviews. Using fictional personas a visual representation of the business environment, the relationships between people and the current system was designed to get an insight and understanding into the inner workings of the business while focusing on the needs of its users. Frank Business owner Tom Jack & Jill Data analysis and interpretation of needs A requirements template was designed using information gathered in the literature review stage regarding successful implementations of CRM systems and also the data gathered from the results of the context interview in order to compare the three CRM platforms and choose the one that best aligns with the needs of the business and its users. Screenshots Ben & Rose 3 Design and Development of the Prototype This involved learning how to build upon the SharePoint platform and work with it to mould and formulate an initial semi-functional prototype to offer the user to interact and test in order to get feedback and start implementing new changes. The system was developed using an agile method called Rapid Application Development (RAD) prototyping methodology, by utilising a feedback form built into the system the user could test new features, changes and updates to the system as they were implemented. Weekly face to face meeting were set up and functionality and usability discussed in order to get a system that met the requirements and user needs. Using this iterative and incremental approach for the development of the prototype was useful as I was gradually able to learn and implement functionality into the CRM and the user was able to gradually utilise it and instantly place feedback via the new system itself. 6 Communication and Conclusion Before the task of developing the prototype it is necessary for a concise yet thorough definition of a CRM to its core being in order to understand its application, it was discovered that although CRM systems utilise technology the deeper functioning are rooted in the concepts of value that can by derived in the wider context of the business environment. Results using the Requirements template An implementation of the CRM using the SharePoint 2010 platform was found to be the most suited solution to the problem by aligning it with the requirements template, getting an overall better ranking than the other two candidates namely Microsoft Dynamics 2011 and SalesForce. By focusing on the user’s needs and the context of CRM use in the environmental aspect of the business we are able to develop a system that has an increased likelihood of success. .

More Related