1 / 17

Minnesota Legislative Policy Conference

Minnesota Legislative Policy Conference. February 10, 2010 Bill Leighty Performance Management Group Virginia Commonwealth University. Overview of Operational Reviews. OpRs -- Formation.

halia
Download Presentation

Minnesota Legislative Policy Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Minnesota Legislative Policy Conference February 10, 2010 Bill Leighty Performance Management Group Virginia Commonwealth University

  2. Overview of Operational Reviews

  3. OpRs -- Formation • 11 in total – Energy, Fleet, Travel, Mail, Print/Copy/Paper, Return-to-Work, Communications (data/voice), Water, Solid Waste, Receivables, Real Estate • Team formation began January 2007 • Legislators (roughly 2 per team, co-leaders) • COVA staff • Private sector resources • Approximately 100 people involved • Oversight provided by Delegate Saxman, Senator Stosch, Chief of Staff Leighty, Tim Bass

  4. OpRs – Why do this? • Why were these topics picked? • Cross-cutting, fundamental to all agencies • Where single ideas, well-shared, can be leveraged as a government enterprise for greater efficiency and effectiveness • Reviewing/coordinating at the enterprise level will positively impact Bargaining Power • Expenditure items that resonate with public

  5. OpRs – Timeline & Reporting • Purpose: 3-5 month research teams that are focused on delivering a final report that defines (at least) these four things in detail: • Overall costs and drivers, • The use (or lack) of best practices, • How we leverage our size as a customer in the market, • Overall recommendations for change to make the Commonwealth more cost-effective in that area and improve performance • Except for Real Estate, all reports expected by June 30, 2007 • These reports will then be considered by the oversight group, which will then make recommendations to the Governor • Decisions/selections made by the Governor then proceed according to budget, project management and related policies and procedures – i.e. get in position for implementation

  6. Sample: Energy OpR • Legislative leadership: Delegate Harvey Morgan and Senator Emmett Hanger • Coordinator: Steve Walz (Senior Advisor to Gov on Energy Policy) • Team/Participants: Dept of Rehabilitative Services, Dept of General Services, Dept of Corrections, Dept of Accounts, University of Virginia, Virginia Military Institute, Virginia Tech, Office of Telework Promotion and Broadband Assistance, Dept of Planning and Budget, Dept of Human Resource Management, Dept of Rail and Pubic Transit, and Dept of Mines, Minerals and Energy, Wal-Mart, Food Lion, Meade Westvaco, the Federal Energy Star Program, and the Federal Energy Management Program

  7. Sample: Energy OpR • What’s our aggregate spend? • What’s our spend for specific energy sources? • Are all agencies sharing information and making use of “best practices” in terms of usage and overall energy mgt? • Are we leveraging our enormous size as an energy consumer at the bargaining table?

  8. Sample: Energy OpR • Energy continued … • $1.3B estimate, 2002 – 2006 (numbers need scrubbing!) • 7 types: Coal, Electricity, Gasoline, Natural Gas, Oil, Steam, Wood Fuel • Machinery, infrastructure – do we have the most efficient? • How do we buy? • What portions of our energy costs can we control?

  9. Nominal and Real CARS Expenditures – Gasoline Millions of Dollars FY 2002 to FY 2006 Millions of Dollars Note: Data for FY02 in the inflation-adjusted series has been set equal to the nominal level.

  10. Nominal and Real CARS Expenditures – Electrical Millions of Dollars FY 2002 to FY 2006 Millions of Dollars Note: Data for FY02 in the inflation-adjusted series has been set equal to the nominal level.

  11. Nominal and Real CARS Expenditures – Natural Gas Millions of Dollars FY 2002 to FY 2006 Millions of Dollars Note: Data for FY02 in the inflation-adjusted series has been set equal to the nominal level.

  12. Sample: Energy OpR • The good news on Energy – we’re using many best practices in parts of state operations: • Coordinated purchasing of energy and fuels through private energy marketers and centralized state purchase agreements • Widespread use of energy savings performance contracting • Widespread training of facility managers for energy management • Widespread use of agency transit incentive programs

  13. Sample: Energy OpR • The opportunities with Energy: • Improve coordination of energy management functions across agencies and institutions • Expand use of coordinated purchasing of utilities and fuels, particularly natural gas • Improve training to include certification • Expand participation in PJM Interconnection program demand control programs • Broaden use of building commissioning and re-commissioning • Constructing new buildings and major renovations to LEED or Energy Star standards • Purchase of Energy Star equipment wherever available.

  14. OpRs -- Summary • Here’s the point for each Operational Review • Need to reconcile costs, target discretionary areas • Need to review methods for usage, buying, maintenance • Celebrate existing best practices • Plan to renovate where appropriate • Need GA help, leadership and support

  15. Questions? Contact: Bill Leighty Performance Management Group Virginia Commonwealth University whleighty@vcu.edu (804) 393-9401

More Related