1 / 15

Understanding and Managing Workplace Conflict

Understanding and Managing Workplace Conflict. Is Conflict Good or Bad?. Negative Outcomes Less information sharing Higher stress/dissatisfaction/turnover More organizational politics Wasted resources Lower team cohesion when conflict is internal Positive Outcomes Better decision making

halen
Download Presentation

Understanding and Managing Workplace Conflict

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understandingand Managing Workplace Conflict

  2. Is Conflict Good or Bad? • Negative Outcomes • Less information sharing • Higher stress/dissatisfaction/turnover • More organizational politics • Wasted resources • Lower team cohesion when conflict is internal • Positive Outcomes • Better decision making • More responsive • Stronger team cohesion when conflict is external

  3. Is Conflict Good or Bad?:Emerging View • Two types of conflict • Constructive conflict -- Conflict is aimed at issue, not parties • Relationship conflict -- Conflict is aimed at undermining the other party • Goal: encourage constructive conflict, minimize relationship conflict • Problem: difficult to separate the two conflicts

  4. Minimizing Relationship Conflict Three conditions that minimize relationship conflict while engaging in constructive conflict • Emotional intelligence • Cohesive team • Supportive team norms

  5. Conflict Perceptions Manifest Conflict Conflict Outcomes Conflict Emotions The Conflict Process Sources of Conflict Conflict Escalation Cycle

  6. more Structural Sources of Conflict Incompatible Goals • One party’s goals perceived to interfere with other’s goals Differentiation • Different values/beliefs • Explains cross-cultural and generational conflict Task Interdependence • Conflict increases with interdependence • Parties more likely to interfere with each other

  7. Structural Sources of Conflict Scarce Resources • Motivates competition for the resource Ambiguous Rules • Creates uncertainty, threatens goals • Without rules, people rely on politics Communication Problems • Increases stereotyping • Reduces motivation to communicate • Escalates conflict when arrogant

  8. Five Conflict Handling Styles High Forcing Problem-solving Assertiveness Compromising Avoiding Yielding High Low Cooperativeness

  9. Conflict Handling Contingencies Problem solving • Best when: • Interests are not perfectly opposing • Parties have trust/openness • Issues are complex • Problem: other party take advantage of information Forcing • Best when: • you have a deep conviction about your position • quick resolution required • other party would take advantage of cooperation • Problems: relationship conflict, long-term relations

  10. Conflict Handling Contingencies Avoiding • Best when: • relationship conflict is high • conflict resolution cost is higher than benefits • Problems: doesn’t resolve conflict, frustration Yielding • Best when: • other party has much more power • issue is much less important to you than other party • value/logic of your position is imperfect • Problem: Increases other party’s expectations

  11. Conflict Handling Contingencies Compromising • Best when… • Parties have equal power • Quick solution is required • Parties lack trust/openness • Problem: Sub-optimal solution where mutual gains are possible

  12. Structural Approaches to Conflict Resolution • Emphasizing superordinate goals • Emphasize common objective rather than conflicting sub-goals • Reduces goal incompatibility and differentiation • Reducing differentiation • Remove sources of different values and beliefs • e.g. Move employees around to different jobs

  13. Structural Approaches to Conflict Resolution (con’t) • Improving communication/understanding • Employees understand and appreciate each other’s views through communication • Relates to contact hypothesis • Two warnings: • Apply communication/understanding after reducing differentiation • A Western strategy that may conflict with values/traditions in other cultures

  14. Structural Approaches to Conflict Resolution (con’t) • Reduce Task Interdependence • Dividing shared resources • Combine tasks • Use buffers • Increase Resources • Duplicate resources • Clarify Rules and Procedures • Clarify resource distribution • Change interdependence

  15. Types of Third Party Intervention High Mediation Inquisition Level of Process Control Arbitration Low Level of Outcome Control High

More Related