250 likes | 319 Views
This chapter explores the advantages and disadvantages of psychiatric classification systems, focusing on DSM-IV-TR criteria, reliability, and validity. It delves into various assessment tools like interviews, intelligence tests, and personality tests used in diagnosing psychiatric disorders. The role of behavioral assessment and neuropsychological tests in understanding cognitive processes and behaviors is also discussed.
E N D
Chapter 3 - Assessment & Diagnosis • Classification = ordering & grouping
Advantages of Classification • Means of communication • Labels help to condense & order info • To guide treatment strategies • To facilitate research • Etiology & progression of disorder
Disadvantages of Classification • Self-fulfilling prophecies & stigma - Rosenhan (1973) - Pygmalion in the classroom (“bloomers”) • Overlooking other important problems - aspects not typical of a diagnosis e.g., CD & depression
Disadvantages, cont. • Automatically label those who seek help • Focus on weaknesses vs. strengths • Categories = less individual information
DSM-IV-TR • The most widely used system • Pros - reliable - based on research (validity) - communication - atheoretical - multiaxial
DSM axes I. Clinical disorders II Personality/enduring problems • Medical problems • Environment/psychosocial • Global assessment
DSM Cons • Disorders created by committee • Labels => stigma • Culture-bound • No treatment suggestions • No causes • Focus on problems • Most axes rarely used -> reduces person to one disorder
Reliability & Validity Reliability - consistency • Internal consistency - over all the items • Test-retest reliability - over time • Interrater reliability - over raters
Validity - test measures what it purports to 1. Content - covers much of the trait 2. Concurrent - correlates with other measures of the trait • Predictive - predicts other measures of the trait {Concurrent & Predictive are both criterion} • Construct - test supports theory • Face - looks like what it measures
Interviews Clinical interview • First step • Talk to client • Not reliable across examiners • Valid • Good for rapport • Nonverbal behavior
Structured Interviews - decision trees - for diagnosis • Mental Status Exam - brief measure of cognitive functioning
Intelligence Tests Reasons to use • Mental abilities affect other problems? • Strengths & weaknesses • General functioning
Problems • Cultural bias • IQ = small part of intelligence
Personality Tests Objective & Projective Objective Tests • unambiguous • reliably interpreted • usually self-report
Multi-Trait Scales MMPI - 567 items • normed on psychiatric patients • items distinguished patient groups • 10 clinical scales & 3 validity scales • patterns suggest disorders & malingering
Other multi-trait scales • MCMI (personality disorders) • Child Behavior Checklist • Strong Vocational Interest Test
Single-trait self-report scales • Many scales ex. BDI • Face-valid • Good reliability & validity
Projective Tests • Ambiguous stimuli -> responses reflect person • “Project” psyche onto stimuli • Given by trained person • Interpretations differ (? reliability) • ?Validity • Difficult to research • Used for getting ideas
Rorschach Inkblot Test • Scoring system (reliability) • More validity research • Good for psychosis
Thematic Apperception Test -TAT • Ambiguous scenes • Pattern of responses • Scoring system seldom used • Not reliable (subjective) • Suggests ideas
Neuropsychological Tests • Brain damage & deterioration • Measures cognitive processes perception, memory, attention • Includes IQ testing
Behavioral Assessment Focus on problem behavior • Antecedent conditions • Problem description • Person’s response • Result of response
Leads to treatment • Self-rating - person monitors own behavior • Analogue Measures - simulate the problem in clinic/laboratory