1 / 15

C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen

C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least -Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard deviations. . GOCE. GOCE Tzz (-ITG_Grace 2010s to 36), mean of 1 deg. Blocks, E.U. Use of Gradients:.

hagop
Download Presentation

C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation errorestimates usinglocal GOCE Tzz signal standard deviations. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 .

  2. GOCE Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  3. GOCE Tzz (-ITG_Grace 2010s to 36), mean of 1 deg. Blocks, E.U. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  4. Use of Gradients: • Contribution to determination of coefficients and error estimates of Spherical Harmonic Models • Estimation of global grids of gravity anomalies or gradients at satellite (mean) altitude, at 10 km height or on ground level + error-estimates, see e.g. • “Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity gradients at 10 km altitude from GOCE gradient data and polar gravity, by D.N. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoniand C.C.Tscherning”, submitted, 2013”, http://cct.gfy.ku.dk/publ_cct/cct2208g.pdf • Error estimates not satisfactory – reason for this presentation. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  5. PURPOSE OF ERROR ESTIMATES • an indicator of the quality of an observed or estimated quantity • for the use of data in a data assimilation procedure such as estimating ocean current velocities or an EGM (3) in simulation studies and (4) for gross-error detection Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  6. ERROR ESTIMATES FROM LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION Generally an isotropic covariance function or reproducing kernel valid for a certain region is used. Local variations are not accounte for ! Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  7. ERROR ESTIMATES OF HEIGHT ANOMALIES FROM GRAVITY, units: m. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  8. ERROR ESTIMATES + IMPROVEMENTS • Only show location of data • Sometimes quality of data • Influence of different data types • But may be improved knowing local signal standard deviation or (rms) Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  9. Example of localimprovement of errorestimates Gravityanomalies from GOCE Tzz & EGM2008 to 512. (ITG-Grace2010c to 36 subtracted everywhere), units: mgal. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  10. Differences and LSC errorestimates Differences gravityfromGOCETzz- EGM2008 to 512 and LSC errorestimates. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  11. GOCE Tzz RMS in 1 deg. blocks and scalederrorestimates GOCE Tzz RMS (E.U.) and scaled error estimates (mgal). Now error-estimates show how error varies. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  12. Global scaling using GOCE Tzz RMS in 1 deg. Blocks. GOCE Tzz (-ITG-GRACE2010c to 36) RMS (E.U) Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  13. Global scaling possibel ? LSC error estimates of predicted reduced gravity in 20x20 blocks from GOCE Tzz. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  14. Global scaling of LSC error estimates in 1x1 deg blocks. Scaled error-estimates of predicted reduced gravity anomalies. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

  15. Conclusion It is planned to use the procedure in order to provide error-estimates of the global 0.125 deg. gravity anomaly grids predicted from GOCE Tzz. Problems remaining: How should the local signal standard deviations be computed in case of a local bias ? Should the root-mean-square variation be used ? Should the scaling be done regionally or by using the global root-mean-square variation ? In both cases the bias is small due to the subtraction of for example the ITG-Grace 2010s field or other Earth Gravity Models to the same maximal degree.. The scaling of LSC derived error-estimates improves the estimates, so that the variation of the error due to changing local signal standard deviation is seen. Same procedure may be used e.g. on error-estimates associated with spherical harmonic models of the gravity field and in many other cases ! Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

More Related