1 / 18

Public Private Partnerships and the Prospects for Sustainable ICT Projects in the Developing World

Public Private Partnerships and the Prospects for Sustainable ICT Projects in the Developing World. Elizabeth Fife & Laura Hosman Center for Telecom Management University of Southern California Presented June 2, 2007 At the Los Angeles Global Mobility Roundtable Marina Del Rey, California.

gyan
Download Presentation

Public Private Partnerships and the Prospects for Sustainable ICT Projects in the Developing World

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Private Partnerships and the Prospects for Sustainable ICT Projects in the Developing World Elizabeth Fife & Laura Hosman Center for Telecom Management University of Southern California Presented June 2, 2007 At the Los Angeles Global Mobility Roundtable Marina Del Rey, California

  2. Imagine… • Using a VoIP mobile phone from the most remote, rural village you can dream of to call anywhere on the globe—Timbuktu or your next door neighbor—for free or for pennies… • You don’t even need electricity—solar energy will do! • Using a mobile phone to check prices on crops or goods that you trade and thus make a higher return…

  3. This is a reality—for some… • Our case studies give evidence that these scenarios are current realities on the ground in rural villages throughout Vietnam • So, how can this also become a reality in the most places possible, the world over? • Public Private Partnerships • Third Party intermediaries

  4. Bridging the Digital Divide • Explosion of Public Private Partnerships in ICT sector in developing world • Very little corresponding academic analysis—particularly of a critical nature • Yet, there are divergent motivations: profit motive vs. meeting constituent needs…

  5. Research question: • How can these divergent motivations be aligned to ensure a win-win scenario… • …not just for the public private partners, but also for the technology recipients?

  6. PPPs: An overview • Ideally, these partnerships take advantage of synergistic interests, while building on the strengths of the individual partners.

  7. What is the reality? • “Bread vs. Broadband Debate” • Many large, Western corporations (Intel, AMD, Microsoft) already partnering in the developing world • building future markets • “doing good while doing well” • But are things really different for Telecom?

  8. Data Gathering/Interview Stage • Difficult to get in touch with corporate representatives, not so for NGOs, Govt Orgs • Our Focus Shifted: • From corporate focus to facilitator focus • From “Can divergent motivations peacefully coexist” to “HOW can divergent motivations peacefully coexist”

  9. Third Party Facilitator • We aren’t proposing this as a catch-all solution for the diverse motivations facing PPPs • We are adding a new actor to the equation, and making the case that it can often help align the diverse motivations

  10. In the PPP Contract Formation • The presence of an intermediary is invaluable. • They provide • Contacts • Experience • Financial assistance • Technological expertise • An end-date for their activities • Motives which are not driven by profits • Invaluable Because: a well-formed contract serves the PPP for the duration of the project

  11. The case of: USAID • USAid has been active, “on the ground” doing development work for over 50 years. • They have contacts all over the world. • They have development goals that do not have profit at the origin. • They make bilateral agreements—all projects must have developing state’s governmental approval to move ahead.

  12. The case of: USAID • They play the role of “matchmaker” • They set up feasible projects, but have an end date • They also promote US business interests

  13. Case Studies in Vietnam • Cases very similar: only difference is the technology employed • 1st village: Lao Cai • Chosen because the people could economically benefit from ability to communicate verbally w/Chinese neighbors just across border

  14. Case Studies in Vietnam • 3 partners: • Intel • Vietnamese Ministry of Post & Telecom • USAID • Diverse Motivations • Bring WiMAX to Vietnam • Provide underserved rural areas w/telecom access • Bring the two partners together w/good plan

  15. Case Studies in Vietnam • Both projects were successful • First project finished in > 1 year • Second project finished in 6-8 months. • 1st project used ground-based WiMAX • 2nd project used satellite-based (backhaul) to provide the Broadband Internet • Both used VoIP for voice communications

  16. Looking to the Future • High hopes for the Satellite-Based technology • Intel wants to partner with USAID to implement this project in 30 countries • They’re proposing this at USAID HQ next week

  17. Looking to the Future • Greater need to study PPPs around the world • Intermediary parties have been neglected in the literature—their role should be examined • Common PPP success factors detailed in paper • There is cause for optimism in ICT PPPs

More Related