croatian perspective and regional approach to development of motorways of the sea n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Croatian perspective and Regional approach to development of motorways of the sea PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Croatian perspective and Regional approach to development of motorways of the sea

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

Croatian perspective and Regional approach to development of motorways of the sea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 70 Views
  • Uploaded on

Croatian perspective and Regional approach to development of motorways of the sea. Drazen zgaljic Intermodal transport cluster , croatia. Content. Terminology Examples for understanding the terminology System elements Criteria for the sustainable service implementation.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Croatian perspective and Regional approach to development of motorways of the sea' - gwidon


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
croatian perspective and regional approach to development of motorways of the sea

CroatianperspectiveandRegionalapproach to development of motorwaysofthesea

Drazen zgaljic

Intermodal transport cluster, croatia

content
Content
  • Terminology
  • Examples for understandingtheterminology
  • Systemelements
  • Criteria for thesustainableserviceimplementation
characteristics
CHARACTERISTICS
  • Regularity,
  • Frequency,
  • Reliability,
  • HighQuality,
  • Integrationintodoor-to-doorlogisticchain.
success criteria of sss mos
Successcriteria of sss/MoS
  • Price – Costof maritime transport combinedwith road transport from origin to destination must be competitive incomparisonto road „door-to-door” serviceswithout the usageof maritime transport.
  • Departure/Arrival Schedule – exacttimesofdepartureandarrival must bedefinedandannounced.
  • Reliability– departuresandarrivals must bereliable as definedandannounced. No deviations are allowedregardlessofthereason, includingadverseweatherconditions.
  • Transit time– maritimetransit time combinedwith a road transport „door-to-door” service must besimilar to theroad transport transit time ofthe same service.
  • Portefficiency– portefficiency is reflected in the speed of loading or unloading,high level of security, avoiding bureaucracy, low costs, 24-hour working time andgood connectionswith the inlandmodes of transportation.
  • Shipcourtesy (commodity) – withRO-ROtechnologies, truck drivers require commodityin terms of cabinswith a bathroom and restaurantswhich areincluded in the price.
infrastructure criteria
Infrastructurecriteria
  • Infrastructurecriteriawith sub-criteria:
    • Group ofsub-criteria,port availability with sub-criteria:
      • direct connection with the railway infrastructure,
      • direct connection to the motorway network,
      • safetyfactoron the railway infrastructure,
      • maintenanceofrailway infrastructure
      • maintenanceofroad infrastructure,
      • railway infrastructure capacity,
      • road infrastructurecapacity;
    • Group of sub-criteria for infrastructureandactivities on theland side ofthe terminal and sub-criteria:
      • condition and capacity of the road infrastructure for externalvehicles,
      • condition and capacity of the road infrastructure for internal vehicles,
      • capacity of parking spaces,
      • existence Terminal Operating System,
      • port equipment for handlingofcontainers and vehicles;
    • Group ofinfrastructure sub-criteriaand activities on the seaside of the terminal:
      • seadepth,
      • priority at shipacceptanceinregularservice,
      • exemption for the use of pilots,
      • exemption for the use of tugs;
criteria for interaction with various transport modes
Criteria for interactionwithvarious transport modes
  • Criteria for interactionwithvarious transport modeswith sub-criteria:
    • Group of sub-criteria of interactionswithshipservices:
      • Number of SSS services,
      • Number of regularshippingbranchoffices;
    • Group of sub-criteria of interactionswithrailway transport:
      • Numberofblocktrainservices,
      • Numberofoperatorsinthecountry;
    • Interactionwithroad transport;
    • Group of sub-criteria for informationanddocumentexchange:
      • Existenceofportcommunicationservice,
      • Exsitenceofpriority status;
administrative and political criteria
Administrativeandpoliticalcriteria
  • Administrativeandpoliticalcriteriawith sub-criteria:
    • Service promotionsystem,
    • Service informationsupport,
    • Systematicidentificationofservicebottlenecks,
    • Service qualitymanagementsystem,
    • Group of sub-criteria of common port systemmanagement
      • Complexity of organizationand work functioning,
      • Advantageofincreasedcapacity;
    • Politicaldecision.
multi criteria analysis
Multi-criteriaanalysis
  • Scenario
  • Criteria
  • Value of eachcriteria
  • Multi-criteriaanalysis
  • Results/conclusions
mca scenario 1
MCA – Scenario 1
  • Scenariobased on independentports model:
  • Rijeka,
  • Zadar,
  • Šibenik,
  • Split,
  • Ploče i
  • Dubrovnik.
mca scenario 2
MCA – Scenario2
  • Scenariobased on nationallygroupedports:
  • Portof Rijeka as a separate unit,
  • Portsof Central Dalmatian, Zadar, Šibenik i Split,
  • PortsofSouthDalmatia, Ploče i Dubrovnik.
mca scenario 3
MCA – Scenario 3
  • Scenariobased on regionallygroupedports:
  • North Adriatic PortsVenice, Trieste, Kopar and Rijeka,
  • Central DalmatianportsZadar, Šibenik i Split, i
  • SouthDalmatianports Ploče i Dubrovnik.
mca scenario 4
MCA – Scenario4
  • Scenariobased on thesingle port model – port of Rijeka:
  • Rijeka as a nationallyprioritisedport for theMotorwaysoftheSeaservices
mca scenario 5
MCA – Scenario 5
  • Scenariobased on thetwoports model - Rijeka i Ploče:
  • Portsof Rijeka and Ploče are equallydevelopedandhavethe same status for thecontainerandRO-RO transport.
mca scenario 6
MCA – Scenario 6
  • Scenariobased on the „simpleports“ model:
  • Theoreticallyset port of Zadar as the port thatfunctionsbythe „simpleports” model on theterritory of thenewcontainerand RO-RO port inGaženica.
value of each criteria
Value of eachcriteria
  • Identifiedscenarios are analysed on severaldifferentcombinationsandlevelsofdifficultyofcriteriaand sub-criteria. Ranking is performedincluding:
  • Onlyinfrastructurecriteria,
  • Onlyinteractioncriteriawithdifferentmodes of transport,
  • Onlyadministrativeandpoliticalcriteria,
  • Simultaneousinfluencesofinfrastructureandinteractioncriteriawithdifferentmodesof transport,
  • Simultaneousinfluencesofinfrastructure,administrativeandpoliticalcriteria,
  • Simultaneousinfluencesofadministrativeandpolitical as well as interactioncriteriawithdifferentmodesof transport and
  • Simultaneousinfluencesofadministrativeandpolitical, infrastructureandinteractioncriteriawithdifferentmodesof transport.
conclusions
conclusions
  • Currentmodel of the Croatiantransport and port systemfunctioningis completely inappropriate for the development and implementation of a sustainable Motorways of theSeasystemandit isthe worst solution in relation to all identifiedmodels.
  • Optimalsolutionwouldbedevelopment of a singleport and a gravity transport infrastructureaccording to the„simpleports” model.
  • IncasetheRepublic of Croatia decided to ignoredevelopment of theMotorwaysoftheSeaandincaseitsdevelopment is leftto transport operators, ideal model wouldberegionallygroupedports model. This model considerscoordinationand a joint work ofportsystemsinseveralcountries, andobjectively, exceptinthecaseofthe same owners, functioningofcommonportsystems is hard to implement.
  • IncasetheRepublic of Croatia decidedto activelyparticipateinthedevelopment of thesustainableMotorwaysoftheSeasystem, individually or incoordinationwith transport operators, twoportssystem is optimal. This model presumesspecialisationandpreferanceofthesetwoports, byfocusinginfrastructureinvestmentsintotheseportswhileotherportsconsciousllyfocus on developmentofothertypesoffreightandprivateinvestments.